Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Subtle Decline in ps First Class Product

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:03 pm
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Thumbs down Subtle Decline in ps First Class Product

I've taken four ps First flights in the past three weeks, and it got me thinking what aspects of the product have been taken away, bit by bit, over the past year or so. Some recent developments I noticed this month are more pronounced and prompted this thread.

Some observations:
  • Hot appetizer now only provided at dinner (not lunch)
  • Hot topping gone from salad course
  • Quality International F gold linens have been replaced with domestic white
  • First now also receiving salt and pepper PACKETS like C and domestic F (yesterday's flight had NO salt/pepper boarded)
  • Bread choices now dramatically reduced to two different kinds of white rolls; focaccia and other interesting breads (pretzel?) long gone
  • Bread served cold or barely warm, and ice cold after the first service
  • Last flight had only one red and one white from the F list boarded; served Business Class wine to "fill out the selections"
  • Second towel service inconsistent at best
  • Fourth entree choice for F gone
  • Two of three entrees are (T)rotter, which are revolting
  • Every entree I've seen on ps I've also seen offered on two-class F transcons; ps used to have differentiated entrees
  • Towel service done from plastic storage trays; silver bowels gone
  • Cheese board gone; cheese selections pre-plated and small, like C
  • Seats are in horrific condition; dirty, wobbling, falling apart
  • Tray table now completely unable to support weight of a laptop, resulting in dramatic slant when using computer (this is due to the right and left arm-rests being at different heights - major design flaw UA refuses to address)
  • RCC at SFO unaware I was entitled to access with ps F BP; once asked them to check profile and second time, just used LH card

I think there are others, but this is just off the top of my head.

While I think some of these things maybe on purpose, I also get the sense that no one is really "watching over" the quality of the ps product to ensure it remains at a highly differentiated level from domestic F and ps C, and that means not just the seat. I get the sense that unless someone at UA serves as a champion of keeping the product special, the law of gravity will just bring it down. That seems to be happening.

ps F is still the best transcon product (save CX JFK-YVR), but it's falling quickly. I can't really see how it's much better than CO BusinessFirst seating (EWR-LAX) with their outstanding two-class F soft product ($650 vs. ps' $2500 pricetag). Sad to see this happen; the product was so outstanding on the old 762's before ps was launched. I wish someone at UA were taking care to keep this product special, but it feels to me like they're not...

Anyway, a slight rant, but I'm curious what other frequent users of this service feel? On board service continues to be good, except for last night's which featured one of those FA's that like to just hand you everything and refuses to actually serve it on your tray...
BenjaminNYC is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:09 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Orange County, CA
Programs: Wouldn't you like to know?!
Posts: 23,822
Don't forget

Dessert now only consists of typical domestic Sundae with toppings. No more hot pies (rhubarb, tart etc) a la mode.

Breakfast is the same - now the same as transcon except served on flat dish. It used to have some great choices like amond crusted apple pancakes with sausages, canadian bacon, and potatoes.



Unexcusable, considering the price has not gone down since p.s. introduction.

I used to like p.s. F meal service a lot, but now CO EWR-LAX is better in F (if you get the BF configurated planes)
BlissWorld is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:11 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MBS/FNT/LAN
Programs: UA 1K, HH Gold, Mariott Gold
Posts: 9,630
Do you feel it is just decreasing in F... or is it throught the whole PS system?
jhayes_1780 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:15 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Orange County, CA
Programs: Wouldn't you like to know?!
Posts: 23,822
Originally Posted by jhayes_1780
Do you feel it is just decreasing in F... or is it throught the whole PS system?
C hasn't really changed much since introduction. Meals have been about the same quality (except the bread selection, but that's a system wide decline )

Y, well, I havn't flown Y on p.s., but they did take the meal away

Btw, hot toppings on salad has been completely removed on int'l F as well. Either you have the amuse bouche (hot appetizers) with salad with no toppings, OR salad with hot toppings but NO amuse bouche.
BlissWorld is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:18 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland
Programs: HH Gold, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 4,074
That Charlie Trotter Lamb Shoulder crap is disgusting. Can't say I have noticed a decline in F, as I have flown ps F only a handful of times, I tend to be relegated (sic) to C and that seems to be pretty consistent. The only thing that really annoys me is when they don't board the wines that are on the menus.
UCBeau is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:20 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: UA 1K MM, Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA PLT
Posts: 1,082
Rapidly declining

I completely agree with your post and have experienced similar disappointment with the PS F class. Here's my mini-rant:

OLCI offeres buy up from full C to F, so I take it on a dinner flight from SFO to JFK. Assigned F seat is completely inop (FA says there was a bulletin on it on the prior flight...no power at all.) I ask for a downgrade to C, but it's full, so the FA finds a NRSA in row 3 and forces him to trade with me.

NRSA is NOT HAPPY . I overhear the conversation from my seat, and the FA orders him to move or he'll be reported to his mgmt. Ugly, uncomfortable, embarrasing for all. NRSA proceeds to glare at me for the rest of the 5 hour flight. His cost for the seat - $0, my cost for the seat, $2000+. I'm the one who should be angry.

Anyway, his seat wasn't much better. One of the motors was inop, carpets stained, and it was sticky.

The JFK based FA's could not have rushed the service more - it was as if we were in a Jack in the Box drive through. Food quality was average at best and we also had one wine choice, paper envelopes for salt/pepper, one towel service, and no topping for the ice cream.

I was very proud of UA when they introduced this unique PS product. It's very sad to see it decline in such a dramatic way. Maybe someone in UA mgmt will pick up the ball again and revive it. Time will tell. In the meantime, I'm avoiding the F cabin.
kenhawk is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:25 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego
Programs: Fly UA MM 1K, Sleep Hyatt & IHG, Hertzer. 2022 Flyertalk Fantasy Football Champion
Posts: 11,197
Originally Posted by jhayes_1780
Do you feel it is just decreasing in F... or is it throught the whole PS system?
I've rotated through all 3 cabins in the last 12 months (although only 4 times in Y), most in C or F. Aside from the seat, I really don't feel much difference between C and F. The differences are so subtle in fact, that it's becoming difficult to notice. Overall, it's "O.K." but it is nothing when compared to P.S. a few years back. Econ on the other hand is an absolute joke. The only differences are the E+ at each row and the power outlets. I was shocked to find out there is no meal service on P.S. in econ - what makes P.S. econ any different from standard Y?
TravelManKen is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:28 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,654
Originally Posted by TravelManKen
what makes P.S. econ any different from standard Y?
Average of lavs/passenger higher. That is about it.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:39 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 20,404
Originally Posted by TravelManKen
The only differences are the E+ at each row and the power outlets. I was shocked to find out there is no meal service on P.S. in econ - what makes P.S. econ any different from standard Y?
I think you answered your own questions.

But really, the focus of p.s. should be C and F -- economy is economy. A shame that service levels in all three cabins are dropping like it's hot.
UNITED959 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:40 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MBS/FNT/LAN
Programs: UA 1K, HH Gold, Mariott Gold
Posts: 9,630
Originally Posted by TravelManKen
The only differences are the E+ at each row and the power outlets. I was shocked to find out there is no meal service on P.S. in econ - what makes P.S. econ any different from standard Y?
IIRC, although it is all E+... it is the smallest E+ in the fleet. (right?)

Also, do all PS flights offer BOB? or just meal times?
jhayes_1780 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 1:59 pm
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Originally Posted by jhayes_1780
it is the smallest E+ in the fleet. (right?)
Yes. While mainline and TED offer E+ and E-, p.s. only offers E.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 2:40 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Programs: SPG PLT, AA EXP
Posts: 3,732
The decline isnt subtle, it's significant. It's sad to say that really the only differentiating factor is a flat seat, but when those are inop so often, it's hard to even rely on that.

I'd take CO F transcon on a BF onfigured 757-200 that they now run daily on the LAX-EWR route ANY day over p.s. F. (or C). The soft product is better and it's cheaper by a mile.

Hell, I'd take domestic UA F any day over paying for a p.s. Z fare which have gotten outlandishly expensive over the last year or so. Save for the seat, the service is similar. $1400 for an A fare LAX-SFO-EWR-SFO-LAX is a better choice, even with a connection (not to mention more miles and EQM's).
TonySCV is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 2:51 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 538
Is PS working for United

I suspect it is not. It is notable that PS has not expanded at all since its introduction. Surely, if it were a money maker, United would have introduced it onto other transcons. With all the fare pressure on the CA-NY routes from JB and VA, I doubt United is able to charge enough extra to make up for the loss of seats. I would not be at all surprised if PS slowly disappears in the next 12 months.
oswaldjacoby is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 2:58 pm
  #14  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by oswaldjacoby
Surely, if it were a money maker, United would have introduced it onto other transcons.
This is incorrect. Before ps, there was Premium Transcon for YEARS serving onlu LAX and SFO. AA is the same. I never expected ps beyond those three cities. ps is packed with paid C and F, to be honest, and fares are sky high. That said, ps C fares have almost doubled since launch, while F is only up very little. Interesting...

Last edited by BenjaminNYC; Feb 2, 2008 at 3:06 pm
BenjaminNYC is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2008, 3:13 pm
  #15  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by TonySCV
I'd take CO F transcon on a BF onfigured 757-200 that they now run daily on the LAX-EWR route ANY day over p.s. F. (or C). The soft product is better and it's cheaper by a mile.

Hell, I'd take domestic UA F any day over paying for a p.s. Z fare which have gotten outlandishly expensive over the last year or so. Save for the seat, the service is similar. $1400 for an A fare LAX-SFO-EWR-SFO-LAX is a better choice, even with a connection (not to mention more miles and EQM's).
Yeah... starting to feel the same. Had a seat on CO BF the other day, and chose ps F insead. Not sure if I'd do the same again.
BenjaminNYC is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.