Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > American Airlines | AAdvantage (Pre-Consolidation with USAir)
Reload this Page >

Boeing 737-823 New Configuration Orders & Replacement of MD-80 (consolidated)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Boeing 737-823 New Configuration Orders & Replacement of MD-80 (consolidated)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2007, 10:18 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,630
Boeing 737-823 New Configuration Orders & Replacement of MD-80 (consolidated)

AA managment has finally realized that their MD80's are not fuel efficient.
Various press releases today from AA filings. Rip Van Gerard must have finally woke from a time warp in the executive suites in Dallas.

"AMR, which intends to trim costs by $300 million in 2007, has said it needs to replace its fuel-guzzling Boeing MD-80 airplanes".

Can they buy/lease lots of Eagles with 1800 mile range?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODERATOR'S NOTE

This thread focuses on orders of AA's new Boeing 738 aircraft and the replacement of the MD-80 fleet. Discussion of the rollout of these new aircraft, with specifications, videos, and first-hand experiences can be found in the sister thread here:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...solidated.html


dstan
AA Forum Co-Moderator

Last edited by dstan; Apr 14, 2009 at 12:45 pm
zman is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2007, 10:26 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,507
Originally Posted by zman
Can they buy/lease lots of Eagles with 1800 mile range?
Please, no. Just because an Eaglette can fly LAX-XNA doesn't mean it's actually a good idea.
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2007, 11:14 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: AA PLT; UA Gold
Posts: 5,378
AA says may need more money before able to replace aging, gas-guzzling MD-80s

http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articl...mktNews&rpc=44

CHICAGO, Feb 23 (Reuters) - AMR Corp., parent of American Airlines, on Friday said it may need to raise additional funds as it considers replacing some of its older aircraft.

While AMR said it should have sufficient liquidity to fund operations for the foreseeable future, the parent of the world's largest airline said it may require more cash to manage its debt and pension obligations in the next several years.

[...]

AMR identified several possible sources of new funding, including issuing shares, selling and leasing back some of its aircraft, and issuing bonds or debt backed by new aircraft deliveries.

But the company said the availability of financing is jeopardized by its level of indebtedness -- it had $16.3 billion in net debt at the end of 2006 -- and by historically weak revenues, high fuel prices and low credit ratings.

[...]

AMR, which intends to trim costs by $300 million in 2007, has said it needs to replace its fuel-guzzling Boeing MD-80 airplanes.

The carrier, which has been Boeing Co.'s largest customer historically, said in its filing that it is evaluating the benefits of replacing some of its older aircraft before 2013.

[...]
justageek is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2007, 11:34 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Programs: AA PLAT; Hilton Gold; Hertz #1 Gold
Posts: 252
That is going to be one MASSIVE airplane order when it happens.
n5177c is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 12:14 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,507
What's 300 738s/797s among friends?
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 12:15 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FL400
Programs: AA 5MM EXP, UA 2MM 1K, HH LT DIA, MR Plat, NRAC EEV, AMEX Plat
Posts: 682
Originally Posted by Reuters
...AMR, which intends to trim costs by $300 million in 2007, has said it needs to replace its fuel-guzzling Boeing MD-80 airplanes.
DC-9 -> MD-80 -> B717. Boeing did not make the MD80s that AA is flying around... why can't reporters ever get anything related to aviation right?
AA2070 is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 12:27 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ATL
Programs: AA, AGR, DL, MR, WoH, UA
Posts: 951
Actually, Boeing did. It was just called McDonnell Douglas at the time.
sechs is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 1:21 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 589
I feel like Arpey is positioning for a buyout and huge personal payday. Putting out this kind of story - 'gee we need a lot of financing but all the options are unsatisfactory' - seems to me to be part of that process.
wrose99 is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 2:12 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: AA Lifetime PLT , BA Silver , BD RIP , HH Gold, SPG / Marriott PLT , EF Subscriber
Posts: 6,702
http://www.embraercommercialjets.com...ts/emb_190.asp

As long as they install some type of Premium Class seating [Like AC and US]and can get Eagle type Union Agreement, this is ideal and only 2 FA's. Plus Seat Back Video System.


http://www.aircanada.com/en/about/me...raer_cabin.jpg
UncleDude is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 2:30 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Programs: AA 2MM, AS MVP Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 12,966
More info in http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=664079 this thread, which was sitting on the front page about 5th from the top when this one was started.
gemac is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 4:15 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Belo Horizonte, MG (CNF)
Programs: CM Presidential, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 1,113
Originally Posted by gemac
More info in http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=664079 this thread, which was sitting on the front page about 5th from the top when this one was started.
^ ^ ^
AAEXP is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 6:27 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MIA/FLL
Programs: AA-EXP 2MM; Priority Club-Platinum
Posts: 270
Sounds like the PEK route

Hey Gerald,

You need money and manpower. You announced PEK with no pilots agreement. Now you announce the need for aircraft with....tah dah...no pilots agreement. See http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=663248
rploehn is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 7:19 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
It's just an excuse to park the S80s in the desert and replace them with RJs.
ESpen36 is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 7:51 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rolling Lakes Yacht Club
Posts: 4,985
Originally Posted by rploehn
You need money and manpower. You announced PEK with no pilots agreement. Now you announce the need for aircraft with....tah dah...no pilots agreement. See
If it were 737s they were buying, those rates are already in the pilots contract and no further negotiations would be needed. If it is another type, then they need to negotiate a new pay rate.

It's also a tactic for negotiating a new contract. Is is management saying, hey pilots, play nice and we'll get some nice shinny new airplanes for you.
DataPlumber is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:00 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: from FL! AR for now
Programs: AA,CO, DL,FL,WN.US
Posts: 303
MD's to go?

What's next, I thought the 717's they did have from the TW merger would have been great, and they just missed that opportunity when Airtran and Midwest grabbed the last two. Would Boeing reopen the assembly line for , let's say an order of 250? Beats the RJ's. What real alternative do they have except more 737-800's unless they go the Embraer route (175-190 that is).Or the reengine program , I bet they could get a really great deal on IAE V2500's and winglets or maybe the BMW/RR 715's.Much better than NW's hushkitted nines.
tigerpaw580 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.