My "illegal" pictures
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
My "illegal" pictures
I took the E train to Jamaica to take the JFK AirTrain. On the second floor of the station, I took this photograph of the street as seen through the two-story glass wall:
JFK AirTrain 1
Then I took this photograph facing the other direction:
JFK AirTrain 2
I used to have respect for authority until the NYPD pissed me off last year. Add the Port Authority to the list of pigs. Goddamn do I hate New York more than ever.
In the middle of the above picture is a Port Authority Security Pig walking towards me. Zooming in on the above picture (poor quality, but the pig was pretty far away):
Port Authority NY/NJ security pig
So, this pig tells me that taking pictures is not allowed. I replied, "Why?" Pig said, "For security reasons." (of course!)
I said, "I don't see a sign anywhere that says photography is forbidden." The pig repeated that taking pictures was not allowed. I said, "What law allows you to forbid photography without even posting a sign?" The pig hesistated before responding, probably because he was surprised that anyone would question him. All he could do is repeat that he was told by his supervisor to tell people that taking pictures is forbidden.
I started explaining that the Constitution limits the powers of the police to laws actually passed by the legislature, and that there is no law that allows the police to ban all photography in a public train station.
The pig interrupted me before the civics lesson was over and said, "Do you want me to call the police?" If I had time to kill I would have said yes, but my flight was departing in an hour or so, so I passed on the opportunity.
Should I bother writing a letter to the Port Authority?
JFK AirTrain 1
Then I took this photograph facing the other direction:
JFK AirTrain 2
I used to have respect for authority until the NYPD pissed me off last year. Add the Port Authority to the list of pigs. Goddamn do I hate New York more than ever.
In the middle of the above picture is a Port Authority Security Pig walking towards me. Zooming in on the above picture (poor quality, but the pig was pretty far away):
Port Authority NY/NJ security pig
So, this pig tells me that taking pictures is not allowed. I replied, "Why?" Pig said, "For security reasons." (of course!)
I said, "I don't see a sign anywhere that says photography is forbidden." The pig repeated that taking pictures was not allowed. I said, "What law allows you to forbid photography without even posting a sign?" The pig hesistated before responding, probably because he was surprised that anyone would question him. All he could do is repeat that he was told by his supervisor to tell people that taking pictures is forbidden.
I started explaining that the Constitution limits the powers of the police to laws actually passed by the legislature, and that there is no law that allows the police to ban all photography in a public train station.
The pig interrupted me before the civics lesson was over and said, "Do you want me to call the police?" If I had time to kill I would have said yes, but my flight was departing in an hour or so, so I passed on the opportunity.
Should I bother writing a letter to the Port Authority?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Well, you were taking pictures of a public building in a public place, so of course you were up to no good.
Think of the children. Anything to make us safer. If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear.
Think of the children. Anything to make us safer. If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear.
#3
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: bringing sexy back
Posts: 7,751
The last US terrorist attack involved airplanes. Airplanes land at airports. The subway goes to the airport. The subway parks at the subway station. You took a picture of the subway station. You are a terrorist.
#4
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Baltimore - Hyatt Lifetime Diamond/Courtesy Card, UA 2M
Posts: 994
Well, it is kind of like TSA at the airport. It doesn't all make sense, but you are wreckless to argue with them, and could end up spending a night in jail or worse by doing so.
You can thank your government, all the way up to your President for this type of reduction in civil liberties. And it will only be getting worse and more widepread.
You can thank your government, all the way up to your President for this type of reduction in civil liberties. And it will only be getting worse and more widepread.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
This is one thing that hasn't received the press it should. Why is it that everyone has a right to take a picture of you but you don't seem to have the right to take a picture of anything else?
I think it was Microsoft that came out with something a while ago at some tradeshow.. a little necklace that you can put around your neck and it snaps pictures whenever it notices movement. You could literally record your life in pictures, except it appears that liberty has been silently squashed over the years.
Big Brother has eyes, but you're not allowed to.
There is hope, I guess. Cameras keep getting smaller. And I suspect someday someone will come up with prosthetic vision devices that are to record. We'll have to see how that one turns out... "sir, I'll need you to turn your eye off!"
I think it was Microsoft that came out with something a while ago at some tradeshow.. a little necklace that you can put around your neck and it snaps pictures whenever it notices movement. You could literally record your life in pictures, except it appears that liberty has been silently squashed over the years.
Big Brother has eyes, but you're not allowed to.
There is hope, I guess. Cameras keep getting smaller. And I suspect someday someone will come up with prosthetic vision devices that are to record. We'll have to see how that one turns out... "sir, I'll need you to turn your eye off!"
Last edited by whirledtraveler; Apr 14, 2004 at 5:33 pm
#6
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Originally Posted by divaof travel
Well, it is kind of like TSA at the airport. It doesn't all make sense, but you are wreckless to argue with them, and could end up spending a night in jail or worse by doing so.
You can thank your government, all the way up to your President for this type of reduction in civil liberties. And it will only be getting worse and more widepread.
You can thank your government, all the way up to your President for this type of reduction in civil liberties. And it will only be getting worse and more widepread.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Count yourself fortunate that Justice Scalia wasn't there - then an armed US Marshal might have grabbed your camera right out of your hands.
Looks like you got to keep the pictures.
Looks like you got to keep the pictures.
#9
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Baltimore - Hyatt Lifetime Diamond/Courtesy Card, UA 2M
Posts: 994
Originally Posted by JS
I took pictures from public areas of several other airports, including LAX, and was never hassled. This is strictly a NYC problem, not President Bush.
Anyway, I find it amusing that you are concerned about the police enforcing "non-laws" and disconnecting this from the current administration.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
Originally Posted by FWAAA
Count yourself fortunate that Justice Scalia wasn't there - then an armed US Marshal might have grabbed your camera right out of your hands.
Looks like you got to keep the pictures.
Looks like you got to keep the pictures.
"Sorry, its all out there" :-)
#11
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Originally Posted by divaof travel
Perhaps they didn't "catch" you at LAX.
Anyway, I find it amusing that you are concerned about the police enforcing "non-laws" and disconnecting this from the current administration.
Anyway, I find it amusing that you are concerned about the police enforcing "non-laws" and disconnecting this from the current administration.
LAX
#12
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,957
You should have snapped a few photos of Nazi-boy while he was harassing you and asked him to speak into an invisible microphone...
#13
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Spiff, that gives me an idea. Next time I might try this -- hang the camera around my neck, start recording a movie, and then walk up to the prick and ask him if I can take a picture.
#14
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the home of the "brave"?
Programs: Whatever will get me out of Y and into C or F!
Posts: 3,748
No acts of terrorism have ever depended on or even involved photography
Your Rights When Stopped or Confronted for Photography
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Download the flyer and keep it in your photo-bag.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
Better yet buy the book:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...11028?v=glance
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Download the flyer and keep it in your photo-bag.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
Better yet buy the book:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...11028?v=glance
#15
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Programs: HHonors Silver
Posts: 4,030
As to your statement that there wasn't a sign prohibiting taking pictures:
The Search function seems to be broken for pre-conversion messages, but I think the "other" JFK Airtrain thread around here somewhere mentioned that there was a sign prohibiting photography somewhere in the vicinity of the Subway station entrance...
I wanted to take some pictures of planes coming in low over the parking garage at SAN, but didn't bother because I figured I'd have to explain my presence on a public street to some law enforcement officer...
The Search function seems to be broken for pre-conversion messages, but I think the "other" JFK Airtrain thread around here somewhere mentioned that there was a sign prohibiting photography somewhere in the vicinity of the Subway station entrance...
I wanted to take some pictures of planes coming in low over the parking garage at SAN, but didn't bother because I figured I'd have to explain my presence on a public street to some law enforcement officer...