Purchasing (slightly) complicated (ita matrix) tickets via BA call centre
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 78
Purchasing (slightly) complicated (ita matrix) tickets via BA call centre
Sorry if this is in the wrong area, but as it partially deals with the BA call centre I have placed it here
This is an example flight constructed on the ITA Matrix.
So that is the itinerary, but the ITA Matrix shows this:
Fare 1: Carrier BA LJX7S4C1 LON to NYC (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare[*], booking code L
Covers LHR-JFK (Economy)
Fare 2: Carrier BA LJW7S4C1 NYC to LON (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare, booking code L
Covers JFK-BWI (Economy), BWI-LHR (Economy)
3 flights, but it only shows 2 fares. Does this mean I would not be able to collect my bags and get off in Baltimore, and instead have to wait for 3 days in the terminal?
And finally (the BA related question), are the phone booking team familiar with complex bookings, should I use fare codes or simply say my itinerary and preferred travel class on each leg?
This is an example flight constructed on the ITA Matrix.
- London (LHR) to New York (JFK) — Tue, Jul 4
- New York (JFK) to Baltimore (BWI) — Tue, Jul 11
- Baltimore (BWI) to London (LHR) — Fri, Jul 14
So that is the itinerary, but the ITA Matrix shows this:
Fare 1: Carrier BA LJX7S4C1 LON to NYC (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare[*], booking code L
Covers LHR-JFK (Economy)
Fare 2: Carrier BA LJW7S4C1 NYC to LON (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare, booking code L
Covers JFK-BWI (Economy), BWI-LHR (Economy)
3 flights, but it only shows 2 fares. Does this mean I would not be able to collect my bags and get off in Baltimore, and instead have to wait for 3 days in the terminal?
And finally (the BA related question), are the phone booking team familiar with complex bookings, should I use fare codes or simply say my itinerary and preferred travel class on each leg?
#2
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: JAX
Programs: Ex-BA/AA/CP/LY staff, BA Executive Club Blue, IHG Diamond, Marriott Silver, Chick-fil-A Red
Posts: 3,587
And finally (the BA related question), are the phone booking team familiar with complex bookings, should I use fare codes or simply say my itinerary and preferred travel class on each leg?
#3
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,809
If I'm keen to get a particular fare, and not really interested in alternatives, I simply say "Can you book BAxxx on [date1] in L then BAyyy on [date2] also in L". So long as you're not mixing too much up it tends to work OK.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 78
Ok thats cool to hear, so I would end up with 3 different boarding passes and luggage tags with BA and the internal US airline.
The reason I ask is that some of the prices seem too good to be true on ITA matrix, which is why I worry that there is a catch in the ticket rules or that the BA booking team would have a problem searching for the fare I find.
The reason I ask is that some of the prices seem too good to be true on ITA matrix, which is why I worry that there is a catch in the ticket rules or that the BA booking team would have a problem searching for the fare I find.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Sorry if this is in the wrong area, but as it partially deals with the BA call centre I have placed it here
This is an example flight constructed on the ITA Matrix.
So that is the itinerary, but the ITA Matrix shows this:
Fare 1: Carrier BA LJX7S4C1 LON to NYC (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare[*], booking code L
Covers LHR-JFK (Economy)
Fare 2: Carrier BA LJW7S4C1 NYC to LON (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare, booking code L
Covers JFK-BWI (Economy), BWI-LHR (Economy)
3 flights, but it only shows 2 fares. Does this mean I would not be able to collect my bags and get off in Baltimore, and instead have to wait for 3 days in the terminal?
And finally (the BA related question), are the phone booking team familiar with complex bookings, should I use fare codes or simply say my itinerary and preferred travel class on each leg?
This is an example flight constructed on the ITA Matrix.
- London (LHR) to New York (JFK) — Tue, Jul 4
- New York (JFK) to Baltimore (BWI) — Tue, Jul 11
- Baltimore (BWI) to London (LHR) — Fri, Jul 14
So that is the itinerary, but the ITA Matrix shows this:
Fare 1: Carrier BA LJX7S4C1 LON to NYC (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare[*], booking code L
Covers LHR-JFK (Economy)
Fare 2: Carrier BA LJW7S4C1 NYC to LON (rules)
Passenger type ADT, round trip fare, booking code L
Covers JFK-BWI (Economy), BWI-LHR (Economy)
3 flights, but it only shows 2 fares. Does this mean I would not be able to collect my bags and get off in Baltimore, and instead have to wait for 3 days in the terminal?
And finally (the BA related question), are the phone booking team familiar with complex bookings, should I use fare codes or simply say my itinerary and preferred travel class on each leg?
#6
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,660
yes this makes most sense as the agent would build the itin by selecting the flights and booking class then the system generates the applicable fare. The agent does not search by a specific fare basis.
#7
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Cumbria
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR, Hilton Diamond, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 4,510
I, and I am sure many others, have called BA to book much more complex fares than this. I've had 9 flights in one booking before and know this is nowhere near being the highest. The agent hardly batted an eye at that.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
It depends on the agent. Some are better than others.
#9
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 698
You've mentioned the fare basis is BA for outbound and return. This suggests the transatlantic flights have BA flight numbers.
There are BA flight numbers for some JFK-BWI services (operated be AA). If the timings of one of these suits, you should be able to use the multi-city function on the BA website. This will work for BA flight numbers only.
So find what you want on ITA Matrix. Select the flights on the BA multi-city thing. No prices will be offered until you click through to the end. The fare should correspond to that of ITA.
There are BA flight numbers for some JFK-BWI services (operated be AA). If the timings of one of these suits, you should be able to use the multi-city function on the BA website. This will work for BA flight numbers only.
So find what you want on ITA Matrix. Select the flights on the BA multi-city thing. No prices will be offered until you click through to the end. The fare should correspond to that of ITA.
#11
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Programs: AA EXP 2 MM
Posts: 2,823
#12
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Programs: AA EXP 2 MM
Posts: 2,823
Purchasing (slightly) complicated (ita matrix) tickets
A general warning that BA call centre is not always the cheapest place to purchase (slightly) complicated (ita matrix) tickets.
Case 1. Flying LHR-KUL-KUA (Kuantan) returning KUL-LHR. BA call centre could not quote me the through fare connecting on MH to KUA that was found by ita matrix. No idea why, Trailfinders had no problem.
Case 2. Flying BA: LHR-MEX, few days later AA: MEX-CLT-DCA, few days later BA: IAD-LHR. BA call centre quoted me about the same price as ita matrix, but using the ITA-Matrix-PowerTools script in Firefox, two links lead me to an economy fare that was about £180 cheaper.
Each segment was shown as an N fare, and the fare was the same as quoted by ita for an N fare for that route without the extra £125 for a stopover in WAS. So either its a mistake fare or the two companies offering it (carltonleisure and travelup) have more creative ways of constructing fares than the better-known OTAs.
Case 1. Flying LHR-KUL-KUA (Kuantan) returning KUL-LHR. BA call centre could not quote me the through fare connecting on MH to KUA that was found by ita matrix. No idea why, Trailfinders had no problem.
Case 2. Flying BA: LHR-MEX, few days later AA: MEX-CLT-DCA, few days later BA: IAD-LHR. BA call centre quoted me about the same price as ita matrix, but using the ITA-Matrix-PowerTools script in Firefox, two links lead me to an economy fare that was about £180 cheaper.
Each segment was shown as an N fare, and the fare was the same as quoted by ita for an N fare for that route without the extra £125 for a stopover in WAS. So either its a mistake fare or the two companies offering it (carltonleisure and travelup) have more creative ways of constructing fares than the better-known OTAs.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
A general warning that BA call centre is not always the cheapest place to purchase (slightly) complicated (ita matrix) tickets.
Case 1. Flying LHR-KUL-KUA (Kuantan) returning KUL-LHR. BA call centre could not quote me the through fare connecting on MH to KUA that was found by ita matrix. No idea why, Trailfinders had no problem.
Case 2. Flying BA: LHR-MEX, few days later AA: MEX-CLT-DCA, few days later BA: IAD-LHR. BA call centre quoted me about the same price as ita matrix, but using the ITA-Matrix-PowerTools script in Firefox, two links lead me to an economy fare that was about £180 cheaper.
Each segment was shown as an N fare, and the fare was the same as quoted by ita for an N fare for that route without the extra £125 for a stopover in WAS. So either its a mistake fare or the two companies offering it (carltonleisure and travelup) have more creative ways of constructing fares than the better-known OTAs.
Case 1. Flying LHR-KUL-KUA (Kuantan) returning KUL-LHR. BA call centre could not quote me the through fare connecting on MH to KUA that was found by ita matrix. No idea why, Trailfinders had no problem.
Case 2. Flying BA: LHR-MEX, few days later AA: MEX-CLT-DCA, few days later BA: IAD-LHR. BA call centre quoted me about the same price as ita matrix, but using the ITA-Matrix-PowerTools script in Firefox, two links lead me to an economy fare that was about £180 cheaper.
Each segment was shown as an N fare, and the fare was the same as quoted by ita for an N fare for that route without the extra £125 for a stopover in WAS. So either its a mistake fare or the two companies offering it (carltonleisure and travelup) have more creative ways of constructing fares than the better-known OTAs.
Some fares may not be sold in certain locations, although usually geographic restrictions tend to apply to countries with currency problems or to domestic fares for residents. Availability may differ based on sales office. ITA assumes (unless you instruct it otherwise) that you are purchasing at the point of origin. If you call a help desk, generally the point of sale will be where that office is based. This may also interfere with married segment calculations.
Travel agents may have access to private/corporate fares which BA won't sell directly to the public and ITA cannot see.
Sometimes the call centre is simply not up to the job.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: TLV/ATH/LON/EZE/NYC/UIP
Programs: BA*GGL, A3*G, AF*P, VS*S
Posts: 1,011
Luckily my local BA call centre staff have got used to my zany routing requests by now!
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,146
I've booked several multi-sector flights to the US by phone with BA, flying sectors on BA and AA ... and even AA only, ex-DUB
With the Matrix printout before me, I just narrate the various legs and (usually) BA comes up with the same price.
With the Matrix printout before me, I just narrate the various legs and (usually) BA comes up with the same price.