Lounge Access at CPH for Premium Economy?!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Beijing
Posts: 349
Lounge Access at CPH for Premium Economy?!
Simple question… do I get lounge access when booked on Premium Economy through CPH?! (flying Germany-China). Heard from some people that I do, but info seems to differ depending on who is talking.
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: Lifetime SK*G, FB Gold
Posts: 48
#3
Join Date: Oct 2011
Programs: EuroBonus Diamond, Delta Skymiles 360, BAEC LTG, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 2,827
You also have lounge access as a EB Silver member during July and August. A roundtrip in Y+ between Germany and PEK should get you most of the way there.
#5
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: USA, JPN, GBR
Programs: A3, AA, AC, AS, DL, NH, SQ, SK, UA; BW, CP, HH, IHG, MB
Posts: 1,950
Especially since many passengers seem to think that "Go Plus" is a cabin name. Way to go SAS for your brilliant marketing team.
#6
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 124
I don't know why SAS insists on calling it "Go" and "Plus", but "Plus" is = Premium Eco.[/QUOTE]
Scandinavian companies "dont allow" their employees (guess its a tax-thing) to travel in Bizzness class,so SAS have always called its Bizzness Class for something else (in Scandinavia).
For the last years,their Bizzness class are called "PLUS",because of that.
Scandinavian companies "dont allow" their employees (guess its a tax-thing) to travel in Bizzness class,so SAS have always called its Bizzness Class for something else (in Scandinavia).
For the last years,their Bizzness class are called "PLUS",because of that.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,169
I don't know why SAS insists on calling it "Go" and "Plus", but "Plus" is = Premium Eco.
Scandinavian companies "dont allow" their employees (guess its a tax-thing) to travel in Bizzness class,so SAS have always called its Bizzness Class for something else (in Scandinavia).
For the last years,their Bizzness class are called "PLUS",because of that.
Scandinavian companies "dont allow" their employees (guess its a tax-thing) to travel in Bizzness class,so SAS have always called its Bizzness Class for something else (in Scandinavia).
For the last years,their Bizzness class are called "PLUS",because of that.
If you go further back, 1982. Business class was born under the term Euroclass. This was when first class on European flights was abolished. So a bit the same as business disappearing and Plus appearing. Euroclass as a term disappeared in the mid 90'ies, after which it was business class.
So in short, no tax reasons. SK have used the term business class in Scandinavia. And I have flown quite a bit of business class for Scandinavian companies..
:-)
#8
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
Interesting enough my employer (one of Sweden's big ones) has a strict 'economy only' and 'cheapest bookable ticket' policy for the lowly soldiers in the ranks but due to the corporate contract Plus is often enough the cheapest option in the booking tool
Regarding taxation, one thing is they say all miles/points earned on business trips need to be used for business trips to avoid extra taxation. I guess in the end nobody cares. But it is not about the cabin class, that is purely a financial decision.
I flew a couple of times SK European business class and to be honest wasn't to impressed with the product anyway. Only good thing was the free middle seat, the food was as horrible as we are used to now
Regarding taxation, one thing is they say all miles/points earned on business trips need to be used for business trips to avoid extra taxation. I guess in the end nobody cares. But it is not about the cabin class, that is purely a financial decision.
I flew a couple of times SK European business class and to be honest wasn't to impressed with the product anyway. Only good thing was the free middle seat, the food was as horrible as we are used to now
Last edited by fassy; Jul 29, 2015 at 7:06 am
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,169
Interesting enough my employer (one of Sweden's big ones) has a strict 'economy only' and 'cheapest bookable ticket' policy for the lowly soldiers in the ranks but due to the corporate contract Plus is often enough the cheapest option in the booking tool
Regarding taxation, one thing is they say all miles/points earned on business trips need to be used for business trips to avoid extra taxation. I guess in the end nobody cares. But it is not about the cabin class, that is purely a financial decision.
I flew a couple of times SK European business class and to be honest wasn't to impressed with the product anyway. Only good thing was the free middle seat, the food was as horrible as we are used to now
Regarding taxation, one thing is they say all miles/points earned on business trips need to be used for business trips to avoid extra taxation. I guess in the end nobody cares. But it is not about the cabin class, that is purely a financial decision.
I flew a couple of times SK European business class and to be honest wasn't to impressed with the product anyway. Only good thing was the free middle seat, the food was as horrible as we are used to now
#10
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CPH, Denmark
Programs: EBD
Posts: 443
#11
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
I though SK food was not great since the day I first set foot on a SK metal in 2010. Never bothered to much since I usually do not expect any restaurant class dinner on a short hop in Europe and mostly do not take the meal even on LH, OS or LX in favor over having my laptop on the tray table - I rather spend 40€ in the hotel restaurant for getting real good dinner.
What is more disturbing is the mediocre quality of the long haul C class meals.
#12
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: OSL
Programs: SK Diamond, LH SEN, KL Ivory, AY Basic, OZ silver
Posts: 1,103
Long before my time obviously
I though SK food was not great since the day I first set foot on a SK metal in 2010. Never bothered to much since I usually do not expect any restaurant class dinner on a short hop in Europe and mostly do not take the meal even on LH, OS or LX in favor over having my laptop on the tray table - I rather spend 40€ in the hotel restaurant for getting real good dinner.
What is more disturbing is the mediocre quality of the long haul C class meals.
I though SK food was not great since the day I first set foot on a SK metal in 2010. Never bothered to much since I usually do not expect any restaurant class dinner on a short hop in Europe and mostly do not take the meal even on LH, OS or LX in favor over having my laptop on the tray table - I rather spend 40€ in the hotel restaurant for getting real good dinner.
What is more disturbing is the mediocre quality of the long haul C class meals.
Long haul has been more or less something from the last few years. After one experience of regular economy with SAS, I always managed to get at least in Plus or Business. Not that food actually gets nice or tasty, though. Still prefer LH, LX or OS on long haul (and OS on European business class) when it comes to food. The experiences with food at SAS (also on Plus on European flights) can simply be described as 'underwhelming'.