Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > SAS | EuroBonus
Reload this Page >

Cimber (QA) going out of business again - Service ends March 2015

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cimber (QA) going out of business again - Service ends March 2015

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2014, 9:44 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
Cimber (QA) going out of business again - Service ends March 2015

A little bit older news but I just heard about it today that SAS does not extends its wetlease contract for the CRJ200s.

http://www.thelocal.dk/20140929/cimb...own-operations



I really like the Cimber guys, I hope they can find a way to fly again but it looks really bad and I think the decision is final.
fassy is online now  
Old Oct 27, 2014, 11:44 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Programs: Mainly Hilton Hhonors, SAS Eurobonus
Posts: 1,981
I flew with them from CPH to Luxembourg last summer and enjoyed it. Very small plane - 13 rows, 2x2 seats if I remember right, but a very comfortable flight.
And they seemed to fly at lower altitude than most other planes so I had the most wonderful view all the way down - Clear weather and I could see everything.
So yes I was also a bit sad when I heard the news, they go back a long way here.
helosc is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2014, 11:52 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: SK-EBD
Posts: 1,273
Will be replaced by 3 ATR's. SAS hasn't disclosed, who will be the operator.
Tango Alpha is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2014, 2:55 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
Will this affect any existing routes? I was thinking of flying CPH-TXL-CPH again like I did last summer which was Cimber.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2014, 2:59 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
As far as I know they will keep the routes/schedule just with another operator (or fly themselves). They announced ATRs so I would think extending the JO cooperation might work.
fassy is online now  
Old Oct 27, 2014, 3:43 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: SK-EBD
Posts: 1,273
Many of the CRJ2 rotations from spring have been rescheduled with A319. But that could be temporary.
Tango Alpha is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2014, 5:13 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Koala Lemur
Programs: SK EBD LTG (*G)
Posts: 2,447
Oh I hate CRJ200, but I hate ATRs even more
SK2751 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2014, 2:45 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WRO
Programs: EBG
Posts: 29
April Wro-CPH flights with SAS CRJ900 instead of Cimber CRJ200.
So similar experience, way more available spaces.

CRJ200 are really comfortable (nice seats, lot of legroom).
keretey is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2014, 3:17 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
Originally Posted by keretey
April Wro-CPH flights with SAS CRJ900 instead of Cimber CRJ200.
So similar experience, way more available spaces.

CRJ200 are really comfortable (nice seats, lot of legroom).
I always thought the 200s were a touch too small and I would say "nice seats" and "lot of legroom" is about the last thing which comes to my mind on the Cimber CRJs. In addition they were really shabby and old.

I guess the only worse plane regarding space is the E-145 which I ride from KID to ARN. Horrible...

Anyway, I like Cimber and I'm sad to see them go (again).

Good news that WRO will be serviced by a bigger machine, lots of times I couldn't get a seat booking a weak out.
fassy is online now  
Old Oct 29, 2014, 7:07 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WRO
Programs: EBG
Posts: 29
Ok. 'Nice seats' compared to CRJ 900 (Lufthansa) or Dash Q400 (Eurolot/Lot) which are normally only choices possible for me when travelling from/to Wroclaw.
And 8C/8D has a lot of legroom ;-)
keretey is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2014, 11:24 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Programs: Mainly Hilton Hhonors, SAS Eurobonus
Posts: 1,981
Interesting development :
http://borsen.dk/nyheder/virksomhede...il_cimber.html
(Only in Danish)
helosc is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2014, 12:58 pm
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
Interesting indeed.

I hope for Cimber they will keep on coming back! Had so many great flights with them... would be sad to see them go.
fassy is online now  
Old Dec 5, 2014, 6:34 am
  #13  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,178
Originally Posted by Tango Alpha
Will be replaced by 3 ATR's. SAS hasn't disclosed, who will be the operator.
SAS has closed a deal with flybe to operate the ATR owned by SAS.
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2014, 7:40 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,848
Hopefully, it will be new ATR 72-600 like the current operated by Jet Time on the Danish domestic flights. Actually, the ATR 72-600 is quite nice (new!) and well suited for the short flights to AAR, BLL and AAL.

I would prefer the new ATR72-600 over the older Cimber CRJ200. SAS CRJ 900 is my favorite though, but not seen for while on the Danish domestic flights (maybe still to AAL but my impression is that AAL gets A320/A321 mostly).
SK AAR is online now  
Old Dec 5, 2014, 7:58 am
  #15  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,178
These are the four ATR72-600 previously operated by Jettime for SAS: http://www.sasgroup.net/en/sas-signs...nt-with-flybe/

SAS/Flybe will get two more next spring.
oliver2002 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.