Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Qantas or Cathay in J

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2013, 8:09 pm
  #1  
VLJ
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 286
Qantas or Cathay in J

Hi all - we are hoping to book FF seats to Canada for next Christmas.

So far in doing prelim searches the options on the QF site for awards flights are for Perth to Canada is via HKG and there are seats in J on Cathay Pacific - all the way thru to Vancouver but with an 8 hr stopover in HKG. Will certainly be a long haul.

The other option is to fly Per-Mel (paid seat) and then an award flight in J on the A380 from Mel-LA; then paying for ticket on to Vancouver.
This would allow us to use award points on the longest haul in J rather than significantly more from Perth all the way thru to Vancouver.
We could also do an overnight in either Mel or LA to break up the trip.

556,000 points to do the whole trip on Cathay - or 384,000 points Mel-LA-Mel in J on QF A380 - plus paying seats for two shorter flights in Y.

I don't mind either - would like to hear your advice or recommendations.

Also - it will certainly come down to availability - we want to depart Mon Dec 15 from Perth and arrive home Tuesday December 30, 2014.

From experience, do you find the airlines restrict FF availability over the Christmas period?
VLJ is offline  
Old Dec 11, 2013, 8:19 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 21,024
The other option is to look at SEA as the destination. Seattle Vancouver is not hard

Ignoring cost in points & surcharges from PER I would go CX
Mwenenzi is offline  
Old Dec 11, 2013, 8:57 pm
  #3  
VLJ
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 286
Thank you - regarding the award flight Perth all the way through to Vancouver via Hong Kong.
Is it possible to break this up - I can't see HKG-Vancouver for award redemption but have no problem from Perth all the way through.
However as it is a long haul - is it possible to make one booking with awards and have an overnight in HKG or does it have to be connecting flights?
VLJ is offline  
Old Dec 11, 2013, 9:19 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth Aust
Programs: LifeQP LTS, Avis
Posts: 307
The new CX J hard product is far better than the QF Skybed Mk2 - I believe it is THE benchmark for all J seats these days.
grov is offline  
Old Dec 11, 2013, 10:35 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: JAL JGC Diamond, OW Emerald, Marriot Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 303
Avoiding immigration at LAX would be an enough reason to go CX
Comet21 is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2013, 3:46 am
  #6  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
As per grov, the new CX J seat is the best in the sky. Makes SkyBed Mk2 very dated. QF food is better than CX (just overlook the "inspired by ...." crap ).

But book the seats right now. The longer you wait, the more likely they will disappear - right before your very eyes. Do it now!
og is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2013, 5:29 am
  #7  
VLJ
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 286
Wish I could book them right now og - from all your comments it's going to be Cathay - but have to wait for the seats to be available - flying December 15 2014 hoping to return by December 30. I think seats will be released around Christmas Eve/Christmas Day perhaps for booking.
It seems there is no problem when you search the entire journey with return - but when doing them separately the avails change (when using sample date). We have to book the journey across and then wait for the return dates otherwise we may miss out altogether, so taking a chance we can get the full journey.
First plan is Per-HKG-Vancouver. It truly is a long haul but don't think we can separate the legs for a stopover as the options are removed when you try that search.
VLJ is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2013, 5:21 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Programs: QF Platinum
Posts: 361
OP might want to consider Alaska miles, while their partners like CX and QF flights are limited they are a real J bargain.

I'm considering CNS/HKG/YVR in J next year part QFF points and part miles.

Last edited by Limewood; Dec 12, 2013 at 6:34 pm
Limewood is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2013, 6:30 pm
  #9  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Originally Posted by VLJ
...It seems there is no problem when you search the entire journey with return - but when doing them separately the avails change (when using sample date).....
This is normal -- PER-YVR will be available when HKG-YVR is not on the same plane! Cause is the yield optimization that all airlines do now, in O/D traffic. Unfortunately this also makes a HKG stopover difficult (but not impossible). You could try TPE-YVR or MNL-YVR which might be available when HKG-YVR is not (then you'd need a separate ticket to position HKG-TPE or MNL). Not really worth the effort. Note that J award availability to YVR is notoriously difficult to get, hence the advice to move fast if you see availability
number_6 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013, 2:57 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by grov
The new CX J hard product is far better than the QF Skybed Mk2 - I believe it is THE benchmark for all J seats these days.
^^^^
fly747first is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2013, 7:23 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 859
Definitely CX. Better seats, better looking FA, better food. Avoiding LAX is a great side benefit as well.

Go with QF if you enjoy torturing yourself. Otherwise it is CX.
RA-wannabe is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2013, 8:33 am
  #12  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
Originally Posted by RA-wannabe
Definitely CX. Better seats, better looking FA, better food. Avoiding LAX is a great side benefit as well.

Go with QF if you enjoy torturing yourself. Otherwise it is CX.
As much as I am over "Neil Perry inspirations" on QF, the food is actually quite nice - indeed, it is better than that served in CX J. But that in itself is not a ringing endorsement, more that CX food is very ordinary.
og is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2013, 4:07 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: cbr
Programs: QF WP (OWE) / LTG (LT OWS) | Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 4,972
Originally Posted by RA-wannabe
Definitely CX. Better seats, better looking FA, better food. Avoiding LAX is a great side benefit as well.

Go with QF if you enjoy torturing yourself. Otherwise it is CX.
SQ421 is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2013, 4:01 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth Aust
Programs: LifeQP LTS, Avis
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by VLJ
?...However as it is a long haul...
We flew PER-HKG-Toronto last year with a break in HKG. But with such great J seats, I believe that you will hardly notice the trip length - in my case the 15 hr leg just went by in a flash. Just relax and enjoy the best J seats in the sky.
grov is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2013, 4:49 am
  #15  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
Originally Posted by grov
We flew PER-HKG-Toronto last year with a break in HKG. But with such great J seats, I believe that you will hardly notice the trip length - in my case the 15 hr leg just went by in a flash. Just relax and enjoy the best J seats in the sky.
I have just done a 9 hr flight on AA's 77W which I believe use the same J seats as CX. These would be the best J seats in the sky. Plenty of length, plenty of width. No bed sag - ie the end of the bed sagging from poor design. For this particular city pair, it makes AA the airline of first choice instead of the airline of last last choice. If QF had these seats ....
og is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.