QR First (?!) DOH-LAX 3563 USD
#1
Formerly known as rwk32882
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DEN, FL350
Programs: IHTFP, AS 75k, AA EXP, AC 75k, ex-UA 1K, Ex-BD *G (RIP), SPG Gold
Posts: 504
QR First (?!) DOH-LAX 3563 USD
Probably just a mistake, but it looks like QR is advertising a rather attractive DOH-LAX first class fare. Unless I am mistaken, they only have two cabin service on that route. Perhaps this is their very subtle way to announce they are deploying an A380 on that route? Or perhaps QR revenue management is just heckling the EK revenue management team?
DOH-LAX 12975 QAR (3563 USD)
Purchase by: 28 Feb 2017
Valid: 18 Feb 2017 - 21 Jun 2017
DOH-LAX 12975 QAR (3563 USD)
Purchase by: 28 Feb 2017
Valid: 18 Feb 2017 - 21 Jun 2017
#3
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, ex-AA EXP, ex-UA 1K
Posts: 707
Having quite literally flown this exact route a week ago, it's definitely a mistake. DOH-LAX is a 16.5-hour flight, and both QR and EY fly the same metal on their ex-LAX routes: the 77L, which still holds the record for the longest-distance commercial flights in the world. The A380 can fly quite far, but I suspect it's just short of the necessary fuel capacity to make it to the Middle East -- or, rather, from it, given that it has to fly all the way up to the Arctic Circle to avoid jet-stream headlines.
Also, as many (if not most) of the airlines that have tried it have discovered, there's actually not all that big a market for ultra-long-haul flights. It's too far to haul in coach unless you're a masochist, and having flown r/t on EY's LAX-AUH service and QR's LAX-DOH, it's subpar even in F or J (and I flew the former on EY and the latter on QR). My return flight to LAX last week was half-full even in J, which is a rarity these days.
OTOH two additional factors could have affected it: QR flies to most of the countries subject to the recent ME travel ban, plus its J product is subpar (particularly compared to EY), with a 2-2-2 configuration throughout. Fortunately I ended up with an empty seat next to me in both directions, but otherwise I wouldn't have been pleased with the comparative lack of privacy. Finally, note that QR's newest metal -- the A350 (which I got to fly on my connecting flight to SIN), A380 and 788 -- all offer complimentary wi-fi service, but I don't know if they have a timeline for retrofitting their entire fleet with it.
Okay, I've rambled long enough: again, there's no A service on the DOH-LAX route.
Edit: QR's 2-2-2 J layout is of the traditional style, with two identical seats next to one another throughout, all facing directly forward.
Also, as many (if not most) of the airlines that have tried it have discovered, there's actually not all that big a market for ultra-long-haul flights. It's too far to haul in coach unless you're a masochist, and having flown r/t on EY's LAX-AUH service and QR's LAX-DOH, it's subpar even in F or J (and I flew the former on EY and the latter on QR). My return flight to LAX last week was half-full even in J, which is a rarity these days.
OTOH two additional factors could have affected it: QR flies to most of the countries subject to the recent ME travel ban, plus its J product is subpar (particularly compared to EY), with a 2-2-2 configuration throughout. Fortunately I ended up with an empty seat next to me in both directions, but otherwise I wouldn't have been pleased with the comparative lack of privacy. Finally, note that QR's newest metal -- the A350 (which I got to fly on my connecting flight to SIN), A380 and 788 -- all offer complimentary wi-fi service, but I don't know if they have a timeline for retrofitting their entire fleet with it.
Okay, I've rambled long enough: again, there's no A service on the DOH-LAX route.
Edit: QR's 2-2-2 J layout is of the traditional style, with two identical seats next to one another throughout, all facing directly forward.
Last edited by kirker; Feb 28, 2017 at 12:22 am Reason: clarification on configuration
#4
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,366
You should probably share your expertise with Emirates
#6
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, ex-AA EXP, ex-UA 1K
Posts: 707
Ouch. It slipped my mind entirely that EK flies out of LAX, but you are correct. Also, I looked up the distance capacity of the A380, and it's only slightly less than the 77R. That said, QR in particular is far behind EK in terms of its F product (both on the A380 and the rest of its long-haul routes), and while EY's is better -- I flew it last year from AUH-SYD -- its unavailability at LAX may simply reflect the fact that EK offers considerably more (and better) connections out of DXB. (Or it could simply mean that EY hasn't yet taken delivery of enough A380s to add LAX service on it.)
#7
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: PNW
Programs: BAEC Silver, DL GM, AA Plat, NEXUS
Posts: 467
Having quite literally flown this exact route a week ago, it's definitely a mistake. DOH-LAX is a 16.5-hour flight, and both QR and EY fly the same metal on their ex-LAX routes: the 77L, which still holds the record for the longest-distance commercial flights in the world. The A380 can fly quite far, but I suspect it's just short of the necessary fuel capacity to make it to the Middle East -- or, rather, from it, given that it has to fly all the way up to the Arctic Circle to avoid jet-stream headlines.
[/I]
[/I]
I can't count how many times I've flown on EK's A380 (LAX-DXB) which is longer than LAX-DOH.
Even better, EK uses the A380 on DXB-AKL, which is 500mi longer than DXB-LAX.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, ex-AA EXP, ex-UA 1K
Posts: 707
The brand-new A350 I flew to from DOH to SIN, however, was superior in every way, most of all its J seats (1-2-1 reverse-herringbone layout). Also, the scuttlebutt I heard on the topic is that QR is gearing up to retrofit its entire long-haul metal with J seats identical to the A350 ones.
#9
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, ex-AA EXP, ex-UA 1K
Posts: 707
Again, I stand corrected! I simply falsely assumed that the reason EY and QR fly comparatively older (as well as identical) metal on their LAX routes was because it's the only jet that can fly the entire distance nonstop.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Having quite literally flown this exact route a week ago, it's definitely a mistake. DOH-LAX is a 16.5-hour flight, and both QR and EY fly the same metal on their ex-LAX routes: the 77L, which still holds the record for the longest-distance commercial flights in the world. The A380 can fly quite far, but I suspect it's just short of the necessary fuel capacity to make it to the Middle East -- or, rather, from it, given that it has to fly all the way up to the Arctic Circle to avoid jet-stream headlines.
It's too far to haul in coach unless you're a masochist, and having flown r/t on EY's LAX-AUH service and QR's LAX-DOH, it's subpar even in F or J (and I flew the former on EY and the latter on QR). My return flight to LAX last week was half-full even in J, which is a rarity these days.
As I say, a tough choice. But for many, the shorter non-stop journey time will be a God-send
Not sure what you do in your seat that requires privacy: but be warned, the 1-2-1 seating isn't all that private!
This I really don't get at all: QR offers a big screen, enormous choice of films and a fine map service for me to help the pilot find his way
unless you got a particular bad crew, this is something else I just don't get. True, my experience on Etihad and Emirates is limited: so could you expand on the service elements of those two carriers that are so much better than QR's??
I can continue matching subjective twaddle with subjective twaddle. Some of us really do like the long, wide, unconstricted bed offered by QR's B777. Hand on heart, I am way more comfortable in that arrangement than in the tight "tubes" of the herring-bone arrangement. The downside of the 2-2-2 is of course having a neighbour, but with a small privacy screen and sufficient gap to walk by him/her it's (usually) no great concern.
Travelling with an empty seat next to you is bliss on the QR B777. It means a seat turning into a real, wide, long, forward facing, unconstricted bed plus a spare seat alongside you to store all your in-flight junk. I can't get my head round how any passenger wouldn't find this a near perfect public-transport sleeping arrangement. But, there you are, as I said, just more subjective twaddle... and this is FLYERTALK
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,741
#13
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Metal tube with wings
Programs: KF Gold|VA Gold|HH Diamond|Kimpton IC|Hyatt Gold
Posts: 445
I have to agree with IAN.
The 777 by QR for me, has preferable seating than the newer ones such as on the A380, because it is closer to a true bed without the cubbyholes for your feet.
Yes the 2-2-2 is not preferred, but it's fine. I'll just dine on demand and drink the great wines and completely forget or make friends with my seatmate.
I'm also sure that QR just recently won an award for best IFE, correct me if I'm wrong.
I've also found the service on QR has been tops.
The 777 by QR for me, has preferable seating than the newer ones such as on the A380, because it is closer to a true bed without the cubbyholes for your feet.
Yes the 2-2-2 is not preferred, but it's fine. I'll just dine on demand and drink the great wines and completely forget or make friends with my seatmate.
I'm also sure that QR just recently won an award for best IFE, correct me if I'm wrong.
I've also found the service on QR has been tops.
#14
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Gold (prev. Ex Plat for 10 years); DL Plat; UA Gold; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,339
Ouch. It slipped my mind entirely that EK flies out of LAX, but you are correct. Also, I looked up the distance capacity of the A380, and it's only slightly less than the 77R. That said, QR in particular is far behind EK in terms of its F product (both on the A380 and the rest of its long-haul routes), and while EY's is better -- I flew it last year from AUH-SYD -- its unavailability at LAX may simply reflect the fact that EK offers considerably more (and better) connections out of DXB. (Or it could simply mean that EY hasn't yet taken delivery of enough A380s to add LAX service on it.)
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
If you are willing to take a weight restriction, by carrying fewer pax or less cargo, then you can go further.
LAX-HNL is further than the "maximum" A321 range (with the headwind) but AA fly it with a weight restriction.