Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA & Currency Control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2009, 7:36 pm
  #181  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by Hvr
I can understand how the dog can be trained to identify the smell of ink but to determine if the cash is greater than AUS$10,000 is absolutely amazing.

I mean regular people have trouble keeping up with exchange rates but for a dog to be able to count that high just mind blowing, especially if it is a Labrador which are usually as dumb as the lamp post it urinates on.

Now if it was a cash sniffing cat, well then I could understand it...
emphasis mine: shhhhh, that's the autralian equivalent of ssi except if you're an australian cat
goalie is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 5:52 pm
  #182  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,790
Originally Posted by Hvr
I can understand how the dog can be trained to identify the smell of ink but to determine if the cash is greater than AUS$10,000 is absolutely amazing.
With the exchange rate going the way it is, any amount of cash in US$ or Euros is rapidly approaching the AUS$10k mark...
RadioGirl is online now  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 11:38 am
  #183  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
Hooo-boy. Let's get technical for just a second.



Dependant upon what it is, you may still be.

Last time I checked (which, admittedly, was several years ago and I don't have time before I start my shift to look it up, so correct me if I'm wrong!), the FBI warning stated any unauthorized reproduction is illegal.

I know most video games I've played in the past several years have a stipulation in the EULA that states the owner can make one copy for back-up archival purposes, but I'm not aware of any DVDs with the same authorization.
So many of you drinking the MPAA kool-aid -- "unauthorised" ≠"illegal" -- I can make copies of a DVD that are "unauthorised" under the terms of the licence under which I have acquired a copy of that DVD from the producer, and by violating that licence, I may expose myself to the potential for civil penalties that may be imposed by a civil court which may under the law award damages. If the DVD producer/copyright holder wins a damage award in court as a result of my unauthorised copying, bailiffs may seize my property to settle that award. That does not mean I have committed a crime, it does not mean that law enforcement can act on the plaintiff's behalf or start checking at the airport, at a border or even in the context of serving a search warrant to see if I have violated a private contractual agreement with another party.

The "FBI warning" is smoke and mirrors on the part of the MPAA. Unauthorised copying is not a crime, and law enforcement has nothing to do with it, any more than you could get a cop to arrest your mechanic for not repairing your car the way he said he would.
polonius is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 12:54 pm
  #184  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DCA
Posts: 13
I beg to differ . . .

From Title 7, Section 506 of the United States Code:

§ 506. Criminal offenses

(a) Criminal Infringement.—

(1) In general.— Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed—

(A) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;

(B) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180–day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or

(C) by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution.

And
21USC333 is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 2:04 pm
  #185  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 135
what if you're flying out of the country and forget to declare
your USD$20,000 in pennies?
Roy2CDG is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 3:09 pm
  #186  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by Roy2CDG
what if you're flying out of the country and forget to declare your USD$20,000 in pennies?
you're $crewed and will either have to forfeit your pennies or face arrest and/or fines as that is a violation. all currency (or currency equivalent [i.e drafts, cashier's checks, travelers' cheques and/or foreign currency in excess of $10,000 u.s.]) must be declared if you are entering or exiting the u.s. that is the law but the tsa "just doesn't quite get it"....
goalie is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 3:15 pm
  #187  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
Originally Posted by Roy2CDG
what if you're flying out of the country and forget to declare
your USD$20,000 in pennies?
I think that you would have other issues before the declaration came into play as that would be over 10,000 pounds.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 5:05 pm
  #188  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by 21USC333
I beg to differ . . .

From Title 7, Section 506 of the United States Code:

§ 506. Criminal offenses

(a) Criminal Infringement.—

(1) In general.— Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed—

(A) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;

(B) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180–day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or

(C) by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution.

And
If you are differing with the previous post, the it said:

I can make copies of a DVD that are "unauthorised" under the terms of the licence under which I have acquired a copy of that DVD from the producer,
The copyright holder has the right to license a DVD anyway he wants. If his license says the licensee can make a billion copies, the copyright holder has no criminal recourse ... other than apparently hoping the TSA will find all the DVDs and have him arrested by the nearest LEO.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2009, 6:02 pm
  #189  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by ND Sol
I think that you would have other issues before the declaration came into play as that would be over 10,000 pounds.
good guess....

irrc my central cash vault days.....

a std fed bag of pennies is $50 and weighs 35 pounds so....

50/35=20,000/x

50x=20,000x35

50x=700,000

x=700,000/50

x=14,000 pounds

but what's 4,000 pounds when the tsa has to haul it away.....
goalie is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2009, 7:01 pm
  #190  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by SgtScott31
You, Ari and others still want to ignore the fact that this type of action has been going on for years, and it will continue. TSA is just a scapegoat because the checkpoints are currently under their control rather than the FAA. Like I said before, I don't recall any forums bashing FAA and/or the contract security companies who were doing the exact same thing long before TSA came along. It's just easier to go after them because of the dislike by you and others here at FT?
I just wanted to draw your attention to the following case I found recently, albeit half a year late:

United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee
v.
$124,570 U.S. Currency, Defendant
Appeal of Wayne G. Campbell, Claimant-appellant

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-...3/1240/432416/

Seems like someone complained about the tactics used by the private secutiry firm FTS . . . and won the case. @:-)
Ari is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2009, 8:23 pm
  #191  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 321
Originally Posted by mre5765
If you are differing with the previous post, the it said:



The copyright holder has the right to license a DVD anyway he wants. If his license says the licensee can make a billion copies, the copyright holder has no criminal recourse ... other than apparently hoping the TSA will find all the DVDs and have him arrested by the nearest LEO.
And on the other hand - if he says the licensee can make no copies, but doesn't put copy-protection on the media, the person who bought the DVD can still legally back up his DVD for personal use, something that has existed since the Sony Betamax case, but became trickier since the DMCA disallowed circumventing copy protection.
Travelsonic is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2009, 7:19 am
  #192  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by goalie
you're $crewed and will either have to forfeit your pennies or face arrest and/or fines as that is a violation. all currency (or currency equivalent [i.e drafts, cashier's checks, travelers' cheques and/or foreign currency in excess of $10,000 u.s.]) must be declared if you are entering or exiting the u.s. that is the law but the tsa "just doesn't quite get it"....
Under U.S. law, pennies in numbers over 25 are not legal tender, so it could be argued that this is not cash or a cash equivalent.
polonius is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2009, 8:59 am
  #193  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,548
Originally Posted by polonius
Under U.S. law, pennies in numbers over 25 are not legal tender, so it could be argued that this is not cash or a cash equivalent.
That is completely false.

Canada has a similar law but the US has no such law. (or please cite the valid US law to educate us)
(The US doesn't have "pennies" either, it has one cent pieces-the penny is an old nickname that has stuck).

One can pay for their rent in one cent bags if they wish. It is up to the other party to accept any currency on their terms. For any US government debt they have to accept.

Any coin and currency the US has ever produced for circulation is still legal tender. The government will not trade silver or gold certificate anymore but they are still usable at face value. The US $100,000 bill, which was for Fed transfer is not legal tender outside the fed.; any 1974 aluminum one cent pieces, or 1964 peace dollars have been demonitzed but that is it (they were never introduced into circulation). the only other issue is the Trade dollar series which was made non-legal tender within the US at one time(late 1800s), which was then made legal tender again by the turn of the century.

Ciao,
FH
FlyingHoustonian is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2009, 2:37 pm
  #194  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ATL
Programs: DL, AA
Posts: 6,031
Originally Posted by FlyingHoustonian
Any coin and currency the US has ever produced for circulation is still legal tender.
I thought gold coins were declared no longer legal tender in the 1930s. Was that ever revised?
scoow is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2009, 3:40 pm
  #195  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,548
Originally Posted by scoow
I thought gold coins were declared no longer legal tender in the 1930s. Was that ever revised?
yes it was. All gold was declared illegal to own back then, except for coins "of numismatic value" and certain jewelry items (it was more complicated than that but that is a dirty summary). By the early 70s all restrictions on gold ownership were dropped.

There was some issue with the 1933 Double Eagle $20 gold piece, which recently came to auction. The US seized the coin when it came to auction (it hard originally gone to Egypt as a gift to King Farouk)and a deal was worked out where this coin was declared legal tender for auction with the US gov't getting part of the proceeds, but the other 1933 $20 coins that escaped the mint illegally, are not legal tender. The 1933 $20 were never supposed to get into circulation (like the 64 peace dollars and 74 aluminum cents)

Ciao,
FH
FlyingHoustonian is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.