Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSA forces RIC airport to grant security clearance to a convicted felon

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA forces RIC airport to grant security clearance to a convicted felon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2010, 11:48 am
  #16  
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 17,983
The airport would not identify the TSA employee nor reveal his age. The employee did not divulge on his application—though a records check last fall did—that he had been found guilty of robbery within the past 10 years.

Not only one strike (the felony), but two - he lied about it on his application. And this guy is still working there?

Unbelievable.
iluv2fly is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 11:53 am
  #17  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,884
Originally Posted by iluv2fly
The airport would not identify the TSA employee nor reveal his age. The employee did not divulge on his application—though a records check last fall did—that he had been found guilty of robbery within the past 10 years.

Not only one strike (the felony), but two - he lied about it on his application. And this guy is still working there?

Unbelievable.
like i posted above, "just par for the course when it comes to the tsa if you ask me" (and you're not a moderator in this forum so you could have said un-freaking-believable <slithering off to the penalty box>)
goalie is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 11:56 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by iluv2fly
The airport would not identify the TSA employee nor reveal his age. The employee did not divulge on his application—though a records check last fall did—that he had been found guilty of robbery within the past 10 years.

Not only one strike (the felony), but two - he lied about it on his application. And this guy is still working there?

Unbelievable.
Again, it really says something about the hiring standards at the TSA right now.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:05 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wash D.C. metro area
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by DavidHatt
I guess as a society, if you're convicted of a crime at 17, then that kid should be a beggar for the rest of his life. I am sure he paid for his crime -- he did his time. He got a sentence, -- not a life sentence -- which is what some people want to give him.
Does RIC think this guy is going to rob people at the X-ray machine?
I don't like the idea of robbery, but he's probably wants to make something of himself.
That's my two cents.
David
I don't think anyone thinks he should be a beggar, but i also don't think that a convicted felon should be in law enforcement. Lets put it another way..... would you be concerned if he was hired as a police officer? I would and I think his conviction would disqualify him for many such jobs.

It also says something about their hiring procedures. Did they know about this before offering him a position? If so, how many other felons are currently being employed by TSA. I think this shows that they are not as serious about security as they lead us to believe. Hiring someone who has committed a serious crime is not someone that you would ever put in a position of providing security for an area as sensitive as an airport.

Last edited by danl08; Feb 4, 2010 at 12:10 pm Reason: added
danl08 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:08 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
Can I get a bridge with that?

Principal deputy chief counsel -- what a title! I hope she feels adequately elevated.
Maybe we should call her Margo the Googling Deputy?
Superguy is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:10 pm
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 270
In the lastest thread in PV, BB states:

I was sickened to hear about a former TSA staffer in Orlando who was recently arrested for lewd and lascivious conduct.
TSA takes allegations such as these very seriously and steps were taken to terminate this employee. Yesterday, the employee resigned.TSA uses background screening and perpetual vetting to keep those with criminal records out of our workforce, but background checks are not a crystal ball and cannot predict what a person will do in the future.
Our officers are deeply saddened and disgusted that someone who wore the uniform could commit such an unspeakable act. TSA holds the highest standards for our workforce and this individual's actions do not reflect on the more than 50,000 men and women who work every day to keep the traveling public safe.

Blogger Bob
TSA Blog Team
"TSA uses background screening and perpetual vetting to keep those with criminal records out of our workforce" doesn't mesh too well with this story in the news at the same time.

Doh!
ElPasoPilot is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:25 pm
  #22  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,332
Originally Posted by ElPasoPilot
I...doesn't mesh too well with this story in the news at the same time.

Doh!
TSA's new motto: "Oops"
bocastephen is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:42 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Is the TSA having such a hard time getting people to fill positions they have to resort to hiring convicted felons? This sounds similar to the lowering of the FAM standards.
Would you want a job that allows you to plant drugs, steal from carry-on and checked luggage with impunity, grope children, force pax into prostitution, and masturbate in private to government sanctioned porn? Of course the TSA has to lower standards, it is essentially organized crime.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:48 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,166
What's In the SF-86

I'm assuming that the TSA makes everyone requesting a SIDA badge fill out a Standard Form 86 (SF-86), QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
NATIONAL SECURITY POSITIONS
. Sorry! PDF!

Note Section 22: POLICE RECORD:

For this item, report information regardless of whether the record in your case has been sealed, expunged, or otherwise stricken from the court record, or the charge was dismissed. You need not report convictions under the Federal Controlled Substances Act for which the court issued an expungement order under the authority of 21 U.S.C. 844 or 18 U.S.C. 3607. Be sure to include all incidents whether occurring in the U.S. or abroad.

For questions a and b, respond for the timeframe of the last 7 years (if an SSBI go back 10 years). Exclude any fines of less than $300 for traffic offenses that do not involve alcohol or drugs.

a. Have you been issued a summons, citation, or ticket to appear in court in a criminal proceeding against you; are you on trial or awaiting a trial on criminal charges; or are you currently awaiting sentencing for a criminal offense?
b. Have you been arrested by any police officer, sheriff, marshal, or any other type of law enforcement officer?
c. Have you EVER been charged with any felony offense? (Include those under Uniform Code of Military Justice.)
d. Have you EVER been charged with a firearms or explosives offense?

etc
"EVER" in the background investigation context has no time limit.

So, the guy lied on his SF-86.

Also from the SF-86, here are the penalties for "overlooking" a felony arrest:

Penalties for Inaccurate or False Statements

The U.S. Criminal Code (title 18, section 1001) provides that knowingly falsifying or concealing a material fact is a felony which may result in fines and/or up to 5 years of imprisonment. In addition, Federal agencies generally fire, do not grant a security clearance, or disqualify individuals who have
materially and deliberately falsified these forms, and this remains a part of the permanent record for future placements. Your prospects of placement or security clearance are better if you answer all questions truthfully and completely. You will have adequate opportunity to explain any information you give to us on this form and to make your comments part of the record.
There is an SF-85, which is used for "non-sensitive" position BIs. I can't fathom that the TSA would ever admit that any of its positions were "non-sensitive."

So, the airport authority did the right thing. The TSA should have fired and potentially prosecuted the guy for lying on his SF-86. But, integrity is too much to ask from Gale and her troops.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:50 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,166
Originally Posted by ElPasoPilot
In the lastest thread in PV, BB states:



"TSA uses background screening and perpetual vetting to keep those with criminal records out of our workforce" doesn't mesh too well with this story in the news at the same time.

Doh!
In addition to all the SF-86 stuff I just posted, I have had more clearances than I can remember for the last 30+ years and I have absolutely no idea what "perpetual vetting" means. Actually, it means nothing but sounds good to BB.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 12:51 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,233
Originally Posted by Superguy
Maybe we should call her Margo the Googling Deputy?
New TSA uniform to elevate even higher.

Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 1:31 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Originally Posted by danl08
I don't think anyone thinks he should be a beggar, but i also don't think that a convicted felon should be in law enforcement. Lets put it another way..... would you be concerned if he was hired as a police officer? I would and I think his conviction would disqualify him for many such jobs.
Agreed, with the caveat that screeners are not LEOs (despite tin badge).
N965VJ is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 2:03 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,233
Perhaps we can get a list of felonies that TSA considers ok for TSA employment.

Never know who is looking for a job.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 2:10 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cincinnati CVG
Posts: 284
With the turn over rate they have, it's not surprising. Good job TSA
Sean5294 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2010, 2:12 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by Sean5294
With the turn over rate they have, it's not surprising. Good job TSA
So now its "hire the morally or ethically challenged"? Preferential treatment?
IslandBased is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.