May 29, 2016, 6:57 pm
Last edit by: SkiAdcock
If you truly want to stay near the entrances of Yosemite or Sequoia, there are no nearby Marriott properties. They may be on instance where non-Marriotts work better.
However, if you want to stay near Sequoia Visalia Marriott is a good option. If you want to stay near Yosemite Merced/Oakdale or Fresno/Clovis is an option.
Cheers.
However, if you want to stay near Sequoia Visalia Marriott is a good option. If you want to stay near Yosemite Merced/Oakdale or Fresno/Clovis is an option.
Cheers.
Visalia or Bakersfield
May 24, 2016, 3:06 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Programs: MUCCI; BAEC Lifetime Gold; Marriott Bonvoy Emeritus Titanium; Hertz#1, Avis President’s Club
Posts: 3,214
Visalia or Bakersfield
I am going to be exploring Yosemite and Sequoia next month and may well stay at both these properties but would appreciate any comments especially if one is significantly better than the other. Thanks.
May 25, 2016, 6:52 am
#2
Join Date: Dec 2003
Programs: AA Plat Pro, United Silver, Marriott LTT, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum
Posts: 1,120
For your intended purpose I would split the stay between Visalia Marriott (to visit the southern end of Sequoia) and the Clovis Fairfield Inn (for Kings Canyon and Yosemite). The Fairfield Inn is fairly new and nice.
Bakersfield is much too far from the parks. Even with the above hotels, you'll drive 90 minutes just to get to the park entrance.
ETA: I thought we'd talked about this before. I found a good thread by using the search term Yosemite:
California National Parks
Last edited by ehallison; May 25, 2016 at 6:57 am
May 25, 2016, 8:12 am
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
We've stayed at both Marriotts (a good part of my husband's travel is in the Central Valley). Nothing special about either.
For your intended purpose I would split the stay between Visalia Marriott (to visit the southern end of Sequoia) and the Clovis Fairfield Inn (for Kings Canyon and Yosemite). The Fairfield Inn is fairly new and nice.
Bakersfield is much too far from the parks. Even with the above hotels, you'll drive 90 minutes just to get to the park entrance.
ETA: I thought we'd talked about this before. I found a good thread by using the search term Yosemite:
California National Parks
For your intended purpose I would split the stay between Visalia Marriott (to visit the southern end of Sequoia) and the Clovis Fairfield Inn (for Kings Canyon and Yosemite). The Fairfield Inn is fairly new and nice.
Bakersfield is much too far from the parks. Even with the above hotels, you'll drive 90 minutes just to get to the park entrance.
ETA: I thought we'd talked about this before. I found a good thread by using the search term Yosemite:
California National Parks
May 25, 2016, 8:27 am
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,110
For Sequoia & Kings Canyon if you want to stay within the Marriott family I would stay at the Visalia Marriott (Sequoia side) & one of the Fresno or Clovis properties (Kings Canyon).
If you're willing to stay outside the Marriott family, either stay at Wuksachi Lodge in the Sequoia park or at any of the small motel/hotels, B&Bs or Best Western properties at Three Rivers at the entrance to Sequoia.
For Yosemite I would just forgo staying at a Marriott & stay as close to Yosemite as you can get. You're there to see the park, not drive 90 miles to get to it. When I was there I stayed at a hotel/motel about a mile away from the park entrance. While no Marriott points it was a decent property.
Cheers.
If you're willing to stay outside the Marriott family, either stay at Wuksachi Lodge in the Sequoia park or at any of the small motel/hotels, B&Bs or Best Western properties at Three Rivers at the entrance to Sequoia.
For Yosemite I would just forgo staying at a Marriott & stay as close to Yosemite as you can get. You're there to see the park, not drive 90 miles to get to it. When I was there I stayed at a hotel/motel about a mile away from the park entrance. While no Marriott points it was a decent property.
Cheers.
May 26, 2016, 3:40 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 11,095
The closest one is FF Clovis for the south entrance, there is a CY in Merced which is roughly the same as from Clovis.
May 26, 2016, 12:03 pm
#6
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,285
I've stayed at the CY Merced. It's a standard new-construction CY but it's expensive for its unattractive location hard by the highway. It's 2 hours from there to Yosemite Valley. Staying that far out from the park is okay on the way in or the way out, but not while visiting for multiple days. It chews up too much time driving.
May 26, 2016, 6:27 pm
#7
Join Date: Dec 2014
Programs: GS, Marriott Titanium LT, IHG Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 66
I'd recommend the Marriott Visalia. Not as a base for exploring Sequoia, but as a stop over. It is walking distance to downtown Visalia and there are several attractive Restaurants and even a couple of Brew Pubs. It is a relatively short drive to SEKI. There are many great things to see and hikes for all levels. Don't miss the General Sherman Redwood. You'll have a great time.
May 26, 2016, 7:09 pm
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,110
[QUOTE=spotfin;26687254]I'd recommend the Marriott Visalia. Not as a base for exploring Sequoia, but as a stop over. Don't miss the General Sherman Redwood. /QUOTE]
The tree & the Marriott aren't close, although I know what you're saying
BTW - from Visalia to the entrance of Sequoia is 45 minutes (lovely drive) & then it's 30 minutes up the hill basically to get to the main Sequoia stuff (although the caves are closer). The 30 minutes is primarily due to the switchback curves up the mountain. My sister was a park ranger at Sequoia for many years so I'm familiar w/ it.
Cheers.
The tree & the Marriott aren't close, although I know what you're saying
BTW - from Visalia to the entrance of Sequoia is 45 minutes (lovely drive) & then it's 30 minutes up the hill basically to get to the main Sequoia stuff (although the caves are closer). The 30 minutes is primarily due to the switchback curves up the mountain. My sister was a park ranger at Sequoia for many years so I'm familiar w/ it.
Cheers.
May 26, 2016, 11:55 pm
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
Visalia Marriott is a decent property, probably one of the nicest between the Grapevine (LA outskirts) and Sacramento.
I can't recommend Fresno or Bakersfield. For anything.
I can't recommend Fresno or Bakersfield. For anything.
Last edited by Kacee; May 27, 2016 at 12:07 am
May 27, 2016, 1:21 am
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Programs: MUCCI; BAEC Lifetime Gold; Marriott Bonvoy Emeritus Titanium; Hertz#1, Avis President’s Club
Posts: 3,214
Thanks to everybody for the useful information.
May 27, 2016, 2:18 am
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
May 27, 2016, 8:47 am
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
May 28, 2016, 9:56 am
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
Now, if you're visiting the parks, you certainly would be better off staying closer to them (Oakhurst is my favorite for Yosemite, coming from the south), even if that means not using Marriott properties (other than at most "along the way" to the parks).
Last edited by sdsearch; May 29, 2016 at 8:25 am Reason: spelling
May 28, 2016, 10:55 am
#14
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,285
May 28, 2016, 11:16 am
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
"Go" and "pass through" are two different things. I agree on "destination", but you have to pass through somewhere to get to the National Parks (and other destinations that are "worthwhile") in the eastern part of the state if you live in one of the big population centers along the cost, and the alternatives to Bakersfield and Fresno are no better as stops along the way.
Also, from the Bay Area, you do not even come near Fresno (let alone Bakersfield) to reach Yosemite. The main route is via Manteca on Hwy. 120, which is more than 100 miles north of Fresno.