Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 18, 2016, 4:39 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: HadesNL
Update 2023:
- it seems no new RA have been invited by IHG
- criteria for RA requalification are still unknown
- geographical location of member / country account registration seems of some impact due of covid19(restrictions/availability)
- RA is processed in weekly batches starting december 2022
- proof by nicolas75 shows RA qualification for 2024 seems to be strictly based on IC hotels only (not Regent, Kimpton, SixSenses anymore)

As per Tim O'Brien's post about IHG-corporate explaining RA criteria:

As you are aware,
Royal Ambassador is our invitation only tier with the number of members invited each year
limited to ensure our hotels are able to consistently deliver on the benefits promise,
elevating your stay experience at InterContinental Hotels & Resorts.

Although we do not currently have a published criteria for Royal Ambassador,
consideration is determined by variable activities within a members account such as
- qualified paid room nights & spend across our luxury brands (, 2023 EDIT: Post-Pandemic from 2024 InterContinental only : Pre-Pandemic also Kimpton & Regent ) ,
- member region,
- primary hotels,
- category (of the hotel class / €$¥£ price levels compared to currency rates / competition / city / region / country / continent )
- tenure (repeat custom / average spend at hotel)
Accompanying or adjoining reservations,
such as the additional rooms of your family etc are not included for Royal Ambassador consideration
but are included in determining Spire Elite status within IHG Rewards Club
.


* FT:IHG forum community group consensus / empirical evidence shows
- that members must have stayed at different unique hotels per city / country / region / continent
the amount of uniques needed for RA qualification is unknown but generally extended long stays at just 1 hotel do not qualify
- IHG-corporate showing keen interest in how much guests are spending €$¥£ at hotel's own operated F&B / Spa / transport / extra services / other venues
atacama40 has given us insights that extra spend at the hotel charged to the hotelfolio generates EQP but also flags the database as high valued spending guest
- one must have AMB to get considered for RA invitation by IHG as they seem to evaluate over a longer period the length of one's tenure / devotion / spend / undisclosed criteria at stayed IC-hotels

2024
Royal Ambassador 2024 (Re)Qualification - statistics

Thank you everyone who graciously shared their status and statistics. I took the liberty to compose an overview.
The common factor that is instantly recognisable is:
  • everyone has a valid AMB membership
  • everyone has spent a good amount in €$£
Shoven
IC: 69 N - 4 unique IC - $17400 - 2 unique country

AndyMick
IC: 96 N - 10 unique IC - 7 unique country - 164778 EQP

Ithink
IC: 78 N - 10 unique IC - £27000

Richelieu
~

ProjectSunburst
15 unique IC (USA) - $35000
Kimpton spend: $11000

Milleage Millionaire
IC: 100 N : 58 revenue & 42 award - 166514 EQP

Raynyan
~

Nicolas75
~

ILS2
$20000

HadesNL
IC: 41 N - 8 unique IC (2x USA, 1x UK, 3x EU, 1x Indonesia) 250458 EQP

Marlin1978
IC: 40 N - 9 unique IC (USA + EU) - $13000

HClee01
IC: 30 N - 6 unique IC - $8700
2x Kimpton / 1x Regent : 22 N - $7400

VAbeachgirl
IC: 88 N - 14 unique IC - 8 countries
2x Kimpton : 7 N
total $20000 (IC + Kimpton)

PremexecSNA
IHG : 85 N - 147000 EQP of which
90% revenue stay
85 % IC + Kimpton
10 unique IC
15 unique Kimpton

Darby1970
IC 100 N : 59 revenue of which
37 N : 11 unique IC (USA)& 4 (non-USA)
187682 EQP

Atacama40
IC + Kimpton : 40 N : UK, ME, Asia
Roomrate > £1000

EmeraldLady
11 unique IC : 4 continents
IHG: 87 N
$20000

Dmac1418
IC: 3 N - 2 unjque (IC Houston MC & IC San Diego)
6S Fiji $22000 (room: $10000 + spend $12000)

Smythmeister
~

Additional statistics can be found in the comments of LL
https://loyaltylobby.com/2023/12/03/...4-share-yours/
The only other place on the whole interweb that has an interest in Royal Ambassador.
============================

2023
Below our FT-members from the IHG forum with RA status
some of whom have graciously shared their statistics to shed some light
-----------------------
Mileage millionaire: 155359 EQP - IC nights 58 - total nights 108 - unique IC 15
Shoven : $16000 - IC nights 49 - Kimpton nights 8 - total nights 57 - unique IC 5 - unique Kimpton 2 - [unique countries UK/Thailand]
Stimpy: overall stats higher than Shoven
Nicholas75 : 230236 EQP - 93 EQN
Raynyan : 190000 EQP - IC/Kimpton nights 90 - unique IC/Kimpton 10
Vsevolod4 : $24000 - IC nights 67 - total nights 87
Vabeachgirl : $17500 - IC nights 75 - Kimpton nights 4 - total nights 79 - unique properties 13 [unique countries 7]
Hclee01: >$12600 - >156K EQP - 54 EQN - unique IC 3 - unique Kimpton 1 - unique Regent 2 [unique countries Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan/Japan]
Chinatrvl :
Ithink : 220.000 EQP - 47 EQN
Ninjalad : 150000 EQP - IC nights 34
Andymick : 145000 EQP - IC nights 100
Gentleman adventurer :
Marlin1978 :
Pseudo nim :
Hadesnl : 250000 EQP - Kimpton/IC nights 30 - 44 EQN - unique IC 3 - unique Kimpton 2 [unique countries UK/NL/FRA/Indonesia]
Itadakimasu : 120000 EQP - IC nights 12 - 51 EQN
Atacama40 : >£25000 - IC nights 60 - unique IC 8 - unique Kimpton 1
Eein : corporate rates global & local
Raynyan's friends : RA extension because their account is Japanese registered
Tim O'Brien: after own friendly persuasion effort : $8,500 - IC nights 79 of which 49 at pres.suite - unique IC 4 [unique countries US/AUS/CAN]


----------------
The only other place on the internet that has an interest in RA (re)qualification statistics is at the comments at Loyaltylobby,
more 2023 RA datapoints can be found there:
https://loyaltylobby.com/2022/12/09/...re-your-stats/
https://loyaltylobby.com/2023/01/18/...re-your-stats/



==============================================

Update 2020 / 2021:
RA status was extended due to the global pandemic of covid19


================================================== =======

Update 2019: The RA status granted at the start of the calendar year 2017 and 2018 has been based on IC revenue. As from 2019 criteria again have become vague. RA is not achieved through IC spend only. Other, unknown elements are taken into account as well. (Fact: Some users with very high +25k IC spend were not renewed in 2019.)

Update December 2018: it looks like some accounts are proactively being renewed in December 2018, well ahead of the stated expiration of Jan 31, 2019. It is currently unknown what criteria were used, but previous years appeared to indicate around $10K++ in IC spend only.

As before, please Divide EQPs by 10 to get $$$ Spend
================================================== =====
December 2019 / January 2020 Link to RA Renewals & Upgrades
================================================== =====
================================================== =====

JANUARY 2019 RA RENEWAL STATS [put total IHG vs. IC if you can]
================================================== =====
NAME.... IHG total (paid)/IC/EQP, break out IC spend if you can
Pseudo Nim 73 IC nights, $14.6K IC spend ($17.7K total),
Shoven 70 (50) IC nights, $17.3K IC spend ($17.3K total),
Unterwegs 52 IC nights, approx $12K net IC spend. No other brands this year! No more mediocre HIs to make status.
Kaix 63 IC nights, $14.4K IC spend ($15.1K total)
Tim O'Brien 26 IC Paid Nights as at Dec 27, when notified of RA renewal, 140,171 EQP, IC Net Spend 14, 017.
Vsevolod4 IHG total 132, IHG total paid 101, IC nights 85, IC Qualified Spend $16.5K, total EQP 398,800, Kimpton nights: 3, RA Ambassador Kit renewed Dec 27, RA renewal (again) and Kimpton Inner Circle upgrade Jan 4.
kaka(mom) 34 nights 1 country (all IC), IC spend:23k USD
Lewis42 / 81 Total (unknown IC) / $16k IC / $2k Kimpton / 4 Continents
81 nights total
$18k Kimpton / IC (about $2k kimpton)
stays in 4 continents

been Ra for ~3-4 years

ID;Name;Confirm;Kit msg; Revenue ;Nights;Challenge?;Additional Info

40;stimpy;+;none; $9,000.00 ;50;?;RA since 2001 - exceptional renewal
38;turner32;-;none; $9,000.00 ;?;?;8/9 years as RA
49;hannes08;+;01/16/2019; $9,990.00 ;52;2000;renewal probably because of challenge
17;Lewis42;+;12/27/2018; $10,000.00 ;?;2000;renewal probably because of challenge
27;scienm;+;none; $10,032.00 ;32;?;8 years RA
25;hclee01;+;none; $10,142.16 ;37;?;current RA since 2014 - manual renewal
18;annihilation;-;none; $10,605.00 ;39;?;
51;crosskonaftw;?;none; $10,700.00 ;35;?;not yet RA
30;Land-of-Miles;+;none; $10,999.00 ;19;?;
16;Kimsbrand;-;none; $11,297.88 ;5;?;not RA yet. 13,532.92 USD total?
48;Urby38;+;12/27/2018; $11,300.00 ;47;?;Royal since 2012
42;SAWorldVoyager;?;12/21/2018; $11,391.52 ;?;?;
14;Cielito_;+;none; $11,511.00 ;62;no;77/62/8 with 12042 USD after batch
45;whimike;+;none; $11,700.00 ;?;?;RA for about 7 years
10;Unterwegs;+;12/27/2018; $12,000.00 ;52;yes;
44;serendipity1211;+;01/16/2019; $12,300.00 ;45;no;first-time RA
28;cazane;+;12/27/2018; $12,600.00 ;61;no;4 prepaid nights not posted until 27th 11890 -> 12600
11;VaBeachGirl;+;12/27/2018; $12,750.00 ;68;no;
50;lukah;?;none; $12,800.00 ;80;?;3 years RA
15;336;-;none; $12,900.00 ;16;2000;NOT completed challenge / Lots of adjusted stays
1;DonPedro;+;12/21/2018; $12,971.00 ;49;no;
47;SD2019;+;none; $13,000.00 ;35;no;stays erroneously adjusted or marked as overlapping
36;BRUSS;+;01/16/2019; $13,001.00 ;?;?;
13;Tim O'Brien;+;12/27/2018; $14,017.00 ;26;?; Kimpton;
33;marlin1978;?;12/27/2018; $14,182.00 ;46;no;
26;Kaix;?;12/27/2018; $14,400.00 ;63;?;
9;Pseudo Nim;+;12/27/2018; $14,600.00 ;73;?;
41;PMMMDL;?;?; $15,000.00 ;50;?;
23;nicolas75;?;12/27/2018; $15,000.00 ;81;?;
5;sharps1337;+;12/21/2018; $15,200.00 ;79;no;
3;Raynyan (friend2);?;12/21/2018; $15,500.00 ;69;no;
22;pantanal;+;12/27/2018; $16,000.00 ;?;?;
24;vsevolod4;+;12/27/2018; $16,319.00 ;84;no;
34;boekel;?;12/27/2018; $16,950.00 ;60;no;
21;ILS2;+;none; $17,000.00 ;40;?;
8;skaya (2x);+;12/27/2018; $17,000.00 ;?;?;
7;shoven;+;12/27/2018; $17,304.00 ;50;?;
51;EmeraldLady;+;12/27/2018; $18,000.00 ;47;?;
32;Mr. Chan;?;12/21/2018; $19,582.00 ;45;yes;completed challenge
46;kaka;+;12/21/2018; $20,001.00 ;34;no;
31;christenlabelle;?;none; $22,000.00 ;51;1k + Kimpton;
39;marcel.baden;?;12/27/2018; $22,000.00 ;77;?;
35;Flying Lawyer;?;12/27/2018; $22,135.00 ;70;?;
37;Roey007;?;none; $25,000.00 ;42;?;9 years RA - 9k adjustment: no kit message with 11k before
12;IThink;+;12/27/2018; $25,000.00 ;85;no;
19;HadesNL;+;12/27/2018; $28,273.90 ;52;?;
4;Raynyan (friend3);?;12/21/2018; $30,000.00 ;73;no;
29;btravers33;?;12/27/2018; $30,000.00 ;98;?;
2;Raynyan (friend1);?;12/21/2018; $32,000.00 ;75;no;
20;Raynyan;+;12/27/2018; ? ;70;?;~30 nights not counted somehow
6;samjnz;?;12/21/2018; ? ;?;2000;


04 JAN 2018 RA RENEWAL STATS [put total IHG vs. IC if you can]
================================================== =====
NAME.... IHG total (paid)/IC/EQP, break out IC spend if you can
Pseudo Nim 139 (116)/85/192K, of which $18K in IC
Boekel 85 (70)55/170K, of which $15K in IC
Tim O'Brien 29 IC Nights 2 Non IC IHG nights, 341,976 EQP
scubaccr 55 paid IC Nights , us$13,000++ / 4paid non-IC nights us$900++ (plus 8x IC reward nights, 20x non-IC reward nights) <== Sorry.. forgot to cop exact EQP values before 1/1/2018 acct zeroing
Cielito_ 81/77/5 - $7,353 F&B + $11,656 Room = $19,009 IC net spend - EQP 468,000 (First Time RA)
hclee01 50 IC us$13k++
Land-of-Miles ?? IC us$10.5k++
cazane 60 IC us$11.8k++
VaBeachGirl 54 IC us$13k++
PiffPaffPuff 60IC us$25k++
??????? 35 IC us$10.2k++ <== first time RA ref PiffPaffPuff colleague
Spitcool 40 IC us$15k++
Eltham 40 IC us$12k++
shoven 43 IC us$15k++ <== first time RA
skaya (partner) ?? IC us$10.2k++ <== renewed
darby1970 62 IC us$13k++
The Mileage Millionaire 102 paid IHG nights / 100 paid IC nights / 229k EQP / $22.7k++ IC spend
Orion_1 8 nights at IC, spent at 2 properties - USD 10,200 in total at ICs (honeymoon...)
HadesNL Elite qualifying points: 239,095, Qualifying nights: 39
Aussielori 50 IC us$8k++ 9.2k overall renewed on 16 jan

04 JAN 2018 RA LOSS STATS [put total IHG vs. IC if you can]
================================================== =====

tarek.h ?? IC us$9.1k++

sharps1337 IC us$9.9k++ (and 129 non-IC us$17k++ )

04 JAN 2017 RA RENEWAL STATS (Please include 2016 y/end EQP count)
================================================== =====
NAME.... IHG/IC/IC's EQP $$$$s
SCUBACCR 80/56/13 EQP=14,979 (Split $12864 + $2115)
HANNES08 76/46/10 EQP=11,200
OZ_CATALYST 75/63/8 EQP=14,700 (first Time RA) ($12414 at ICs)
TAREK.H 46/37/4 EQP=14.500 ($10,917 IC Spend)
TravelTheWorld66 147/33/11 EQP=27.972 ($8500 IC Spend)
HCLEE01 67/50/6 EQP=14880
ATACAMA40 82/56/10 EQP=??,???
VaBeachGirl 84/42/12 EQP=15,000
Land-of-Miles 87/73/10 EQP=40,000
SSH4POOH 132/99/28 EQP=50,000
???????? 75/35/8 EQP=??,??? (First Time RA, ref SSH4POOH)
iThink 82/36/11 EQP = 18,200
aussielori 75/45/5 EQP =15,100
1010101 50/48/4 = 12,500
MYSTERY7 63/45/? EQP=25,000 (First Time RA)
EmeraldLady 68/42/10 EQP=15,500
NKU 86/80/5 EQP=20,000
Petrus 110/40/3 EQP=20,000 ($8500 IC Spend)
JOHHENRIK 74/65/10 EQP=16,800
SyLance 76/76/4 EQP=17,500 (RA again after 3years missed)
Pseudo Nim 90/58/15 IC spend $9,500, $17K across chain (175K EQP)
Tim O'Brien 58 nights, EQP 474,576 , July 31, 2017 Year End, renewed to Dec 29, 2017
HadesNL 22/20/7 and us$20,000 ref two posts.
PROTEOME 53/36/? $25,000 (Plus further 30x IC Non-qual nights and 18 IC Award nights) <== nb Maybe/Maybe-Not the IC Non-qual $$'s count as about half EQPs spend, probably > 10k IC qual spend
Chinatrvl 88 nights (in all brands, but c. 75 in ICs), 300,000 EQP, ADR c. 115 USD as I stayed mostly on a locally negotiated rate (spend c. 10k USD)
Unterwegs 78(my count 86)/63/10/285.000 (according to email, I would have expected less. my spending estimate is 15-20K$)
Lewis42 77/39/10 EQP=16010
Whimike 88/35/12 EQP=14220

04 JAN 2017 RA Demotion to xxx Ambassador stats (if > 75/30/3)
==================================================
NAME IHG/IC/IC's EQP $$$$s

[Archived - no longer valid] New (Royal) Ambassador Criteria

A document was unintentionally available in the internet about changes to the (Royal) Ambassador Qualifying and Re-Qualifying criteria.
The document is available on

http://viewfromthewing.img.boardinga...Ambassador.pdf

Older discussion
There was an ongoing discussion about the criteria for some time. This thread is now closed.

update from Executive Liaison Sept, 2023,
spend at other IHG luxury brands does count for RA, and Renewal.
Brands weren't stated, but reasonable to assume Six Senses, Regent, and Kimpton.

















Print Wikipost

New RA qualifying criteria based on IC Revenue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2016, 6:57 pm
  #61  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
Originally Posted by Nickolash27
How will you know? I would be very surprised if they depart from the "top 1%/by invitation" line. It's a distinctive element of the IHG program.
i don't expect we will, until we start getting data points here, and elsewhere. they've been saying the top 1% for years, even when they published the 60/20/3. i don't disagree, i think they'll continue with the same mantra, whilst evaluating revenue, and most probably profitability, v nights^
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2016, 11:04 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Amsterdam, Asia, UK
Programs: IHG RA (Spire), HH Diamond, MR Platinum, SQ Gold, KLM Gold, BAEC Gold
Posts: 5,072
Originally Posted by Tim O'Brien
this is a different matter, they are responsible for the document being published, and readily available to the public, via commercial search engines. imagine someone publishing something in a newspaper, they may attempt to retract it, but once it's published, it's in the public domain for public consumption, if they can't take it down from their own URLs, or have various parties that have it listed, take it down, the only relief available to them is if they can get court order to get it taken down.

in the phone case, i gather they were proactive prior to a third party publishing, after their employee's mistake.
IHG must monitor FT and/or LoyaltyLobby.

The 'discovered' ambassador.pdf document is now a protected url/file, although those aware yesterday already have downloaded it nodoubt.

IHG have not protected the powerpoint pptx file or the magazine file though.
scubaccr is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2016, 11:15 pm
  #63  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
Originally Posted by scubaccr
IHG must monitor FT and/or LoyaltyLobby.

The 'discovered' ambassador.pdf document is now a protected url/file, although those aware yesterday already have downloaded it nodoubt.

IHG have not protected the powerpoint pptx file or the magazine file though.
interesting, yes, they have their reps on FT as well, is it IHG Care agents? i think also on InsideFlyer, the old Milepoint, if IIRC.

i saw it on other blogs today, including Gary Leff's View From The Wing.
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2016, 4:21 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: 10023-Central Park West
Programs: CHASE UNITED CLUB; CITI PRESTIGE; IHG SPIRE AMBASSADOR; RITZ-CARLTON GOLD; Global Entry
Posts: 227
Great, everybody is going revenue-based.

So being royal getting a new definition.
ylord789 is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2016, 5:47 am
  #65  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
heading off today for summer, woke to this nice surprise.


Sent: Tuesday, June 14,
Subject: InterContinental Ambassador
Dear Mr. O'Brien,

Thank you for taking the time to contact the InterContinental Ambassador Service Center.

We would like to take this opportunity to clarify that Royal Ambassador status is extended by invitation only to the top one percent tier of InterContinental Ambassador guests, based on the number of InterContinental properties they have visited and qualifying nights they have completed during the past year.

Nevertheless, as customer courtesy, we would be glad to reinstate your Royal Ambassador status for one (1) year provided that you stay for 60 nights until August this year (per our last conversation). Please note that this is an exception on your account as a valued member.

Sincerely,
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2016, 6:28 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Programs: IHG
Posts: 1,316
Originally Posted by Tim O'Brien
heading off today for summer, woke to this nice surprise.


Sent: Tuesday, June 14,
Subject: InterContinental Ambassador
Dear Mr. O'Brien,

Thank you for taking the time to contact the InterContinental Ambassador Service Center.

We would like to take this opportunity to clarify that Royal Ambassador status is extended by invitation only to the top one percent tier of InterContinental Ambassador guests, based on the number of InterContinental properties they have visited and qualifying nights they have completed during the past year.

Nevertheless, as customer courtesy, we would be glad to reinstate your Royal Ambassador status for one (1) year provided that you stay for 60 nights until August this year (per our last conversation). Please note that this is an exception on your account as a valued member.

Sincerely,
That's great, Tim. Glad it worked out ^
turner32 is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2016, 6:53 am
  #67  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
Originally Posted by turner32
That's great, Tim. Glad it worked out ^
thks, the interesting thing is all i wanted was for my ambassador clock to have renewed in Jan when i attempted to, couldn't do it online, so phoned a few times, spoke to a supervisor, she couldn't process either, but i didn't want to lose my 34/24/4 since Aug last year, so they've agreed on the manual count of those, and just 26 nights to trigger RA that i'll do by mid July, so pretty nice outcome. ironic that it's still about 60 nights^
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 1:34 am
  #68  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
New RA qualifying criteria based on IC Revenue

For those not following the "New RA qualifying criteria based on nights" thread,

It looks like Intercontinental are now basing Royal Ambassador on spend at IC properties exclusively.

Being phased in.

Good news for IC stayers.
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 3:03 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Amsterdam, Asia, UK
Programs: IHG RA (Spire), HH Diamond, MR Platinum, SQ Gold, KLM Gold, BAEC Gold
Posts: 5,072
Originally Posted by Tim O'Brien
For those not following the "New RA qualifying criteria based on nights" thread,

It looks like Intercontinental are now basing Royal Ambassador on spend at IC properties exclusively.

Being phased in.

Good news for IC stayers.
Excluding longtem stays, I am sure very low %age of RAs qualified on 60/60/3 100% IC nights, as even if money no object IC branded hotel coverage is variable.

We already know many RAs try renewing with minimum nn/20/3 IC brand nights. I struggle to hit much more than 30nights most years as a UK non-USA/CHINA IHGer

So not totally good news unless you conveniently live/work/travel to where multiple ICs are located.
Reason a mix of hotels was historically needed and allowed is due to relatively small number of IC locations and a very uneven concentration of the IC's. Whilst new IC's are signed+opened that is mostly outside Europe where we have actually lost some IC's recently.
Apart from USA and China one needs travel abroad for enough IC nights and revenue (Yes France has a few but not really in business locations)

pdf says in future "qual of RA by revenue value of IC stays only" but revenue model change will be phased in.
.....At least for next 12months and probably 18-24months qualification is going to be given on nights same as now (IC and non-IC) but with a higher IC nights component over the previous low 20nights. Pure revenue RA qual method to count from right now hopefully

If you book suites, or stay in the priceier cities London/Paris/Amsterdam/HongKong/NewYork then on pure revenue basis one needs less nights, maybe just 20-25 IC nights and those of us outside China/USA will no longer need to flesh out totals at poorer (sometomes inadequate) CP+HI hotels.

I hopefully see myself retaining RA via this new revenue model at lower total IHG expenditure, due to no longer needing to spend for unwanted CP/HI nights on top of planned IC nights. ^

Like most things I don't think IHG have really thought this through carefully enough,
ie what happens when RA's like myself who probably re-qualify as RA on revenue of 30x IC nights, drop the non-needed other-brand nights.
Total RA revenue then decreases which IHG will notice in 24months time. So IHG will then have to credit RAs for non-IC night's again in some fashion to restore those lost stays
scubaccr is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 5:12 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Programs: UA 1K, DL Gold, IHG Diamond AMB, MR Gold, HH Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, National EE
Posts: 1,083
Originally Posted by Tim O'Brien

Good news for IC stayers.
Not really.
TravelTheWorld66 is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 6:52 am
  #71  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
Originally Posted by TravelTheWorld66
Not really.
from the perspective of if you predominately stay at IC properties versus the other IHG brands.

i guess in fairness, it does depend on the revenue thresholds.
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 6:53 am
  #72  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
Originally Posted by scubaccr
Excluding longtem stays, I am sure very low %age of RAs qualified on 60/60/3 100% IC nights, as even if money no object IC branded hotel coverage is variable.

We already know many RAs try renewing with minimum nn/20/3 IC brand nights. I struggle to hit much more than 30nights most years as a UK non-USA/CHINA IHGer

So not totally good news unless you conveniently live/work/travel to where multiple ICs are located.
Reason a mix of hotels was historically needed and allowed is due to relatively small number of IC locations and a very uneven concentration of the IC's. Whilst new IC's are signed+opened that is mostly outside Europe where we have actually lost some IC's recently.
Apart from USA and China one needs travel abroad for enough IC nights and revenue (Yes France has a few but not really in business locations)

pdf says in future "qual of RA by revenue value of IC stays only" but revenue model change will be phased in.
.....At least for next 12months and probably 18-24months qualification is going to be given on nights same as now (IC and non-IC) but with a higher IC nights component over the previous low 20nights. Pure revenue RA qual method to count from right now hopefully

If you book suites, or stay in the priceier cities London/Paris/Amsterdam/HongKong/NewYork then on pure revenue basis one needs less nights, maybe just 20-25 IC nights and those of us outside China/USA will no longer need to flesh out totals at poorer (sometomes inadequate) CP+HI hotels.

I hopefully see myself retaining RA via this new revenue model at lower total IHG expenditure, due to no longer needing to spend for unwanted CP/HI nights on top of planned IC nights. ^

Like most things I don't think IHG have really thought this through carefully enough,
ie what happens when RA's like myself who probably re-qualify as RA on revenue of 30x IC nights, drop the non-needed other-brand nights.
Total RA revenue then decreases which IHG will notice in 24months time. So IHG will then have to credit RAs for non-IC night's again in some fashion to restore those lost stays
i don't disagree with most of what you've stated.

one point i've never had any problems with is long term stays on negotiated rates.

i've never had a problem not having them count for qualifying nights/stays, and points etc, so i wld see the revenue model the same, as long as that's the deal with the property to have it processed as a qualifying stay. you always have to have it broken down into four week invoices, as their billing system is limited to four to six week maximum.
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 7:13 am
  #73  
336
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,443
Revenue based makes a lot of sense to earn status. Consequence is, booking more expensive rooms/suites yields status more 'easily'.

But, once qualified, if you modify your stay pattern, and book entry level rooms, in order to capitalise on upgrade perk, your spend plummets, and you will be 'punished' by not requalifying.
336 is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 12:57 pm
  #74  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: IHG, RC, HH, AA, QF, UA, Aeroplan
Posts: 2,690
Originally Posted by 336
Revenue based makes a lot of sense to earn status. Consequence is, booking more expensive rooms/suites yields status more 'easily'.

But, once qualified, if you modify your stay pattern, and book entry level rooms, in order to capitalise on upgrade perk, your spend plummets, and you will be 'punished' by not requalifying.
true i expect for many, although i nearly always take a conservative approach, particularly at properties i haven't stayed at previously, research the room structure, and book a room or suite, two levels under where i want to end up, unless it's a property where i know the management, or one i know where they give multiple level upgrades.
Tim O'Brien is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2016, 3:12 pm
  #75  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MAN and LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC LT Gold, HH Dia, MR LT Plat, IHG Diamond Amb, Amex Plat
Posts: 13,773
My non IC stays will drop off a cliff once the new criteria is in effect. I make something of an effort now to stay at borderline IHG properties to ease RA qualification. If the trigger value is somewhere in the ballpark of $15K then I would be quite happy and then just stay at the lesser IHG brands when a particular property suited me.

This is great news given that my free HH Diamond will end next year, so I can bump up my Hilton stays.
Land-of-Miles is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.