Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Emirates | Skywards
Reload this Page >

Nonstop to Auckland: 772 from 1 March

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Nonstop to Auckland: 772 from 1 March

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2016, 9:32 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,307
Originally Posted by lighthand
To be fair NZ does have great service. In fact I was pleasantly surprised during my last CHC x SIN flight on my way to NRT. The FAs were funny and always seems to be in a good mood, and does not seem to get flustered at all.

BUT that being said, I'm sure there are those who view price as the most important factor. Just need to see how big a base this will be, not forgetting that EKs service's not bad as well.
It wasn't the NZ service bit that was made up, it was that free market forces will make purchasers go for quality over price.
ft101 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2016, 12:13 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 430
Originally Posted by ft101
It wasn't the NZ service bit that was made up, it was that free market forces will make purchasers go for quality over price.
Allegedly ME3 consistently did two things 1) Capacity Dumping 2) Price Lowering.

But gave different rational in different countries why local competition almost vanished.

1) South Africa - SAA - Bad management
2) India - AI - Poor service and bad management
3) Australia - QF - They wanted us
4) UK -BA - WW future job opportunities
5) USA - US3 - Bad product and bad service

None of these previously stated reasons are valid for NZ. So if NZ's load factors fall and yields get trashed, it would be just because of capacity dumping and price lowering.
avcritic is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2016, 4:46 pm
  #33  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,618
Originally Posted by avcritic
None of these previously stated reasons are valid for NZ. So if NZ's load factors fall and yields get trashed, it would be just because of capacity dumping and price lowering.
Or maybe people don't want to go through the pantomime at LAX?
DYKWIA is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2016, 11:49 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,454
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
Or maybe people don't want to go through the pantomime at LAX?
And the new one-stops to all of the destinations not served by *A in Europe from Asia/US hubs
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 12:16 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Skywards
Posts: 946
maybe it helps someone: they told me that I could rebook to the direct fly free of charge as long at is on the same day and same booking class available - quite generous!
kuroko is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 8:41 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Usually Auckland, NZ
Programs: NZ Elite (*G), QF S (OWR), UA 0.14MM
Posts: 690
Originally Posted by kuroko
maybe it helps someone: they told me that I could rebook to the direct fly free of charge as long at is on the same day and same booking class available - quite generous!
Letsee...
A380 F suite Vs 77L F suite, I'd say you are ever so slightly better off on the direct 77L
http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...ich-is-better/

A380 J fully-flat/direct aisle access all seats Vs 777L J angled-flat 2-3-2 layout
Not to mention that on-board A380 bar at the back... I'd pick A380

A380 Y 18" 10-abreast Vs 777L Y "barely" 17" 10-abreast
Surely that's a no-brainer?

Seriously, unless you're booked into an F suite, you are better off with a short-hop Trans Tasman in Aussie, stretch your legs instead of a sub-par Y and J product for 17 hours non-stop... unless you REALLY value that extra 3 hours shaved by the direct service, which would connect you to almost the same onwards Europe flights anyway.

Of course they'd be generous in waiving any change fees for you to switch to the direct service, no doubt to help fill the plane up... like someone mentioned above, notice how Emirates nor the NZ media even makes mention of the utter sardine can that is Economy on their 777? Yeah... I wouldn't too if I work for EK PR...
Kamadan is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 9:07 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,454
Originally Posted by Kamadan
Letsee...
A380 F suite Vs 77L F suite, I'd say you are ever so slightly better off on the direct 77L
http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...ich-is-better/

A380 J fully-flat/direct aisle access all seats Vs 777L J angled-flat 2-3-2 layout
Not to mention that on-board A380 bar at the back... I'd pick A380

A380 Y 18" 10-abreast Vs 777L Y "barely" 17" 10-abreast
Surely that's a no-brainer?

Seriously, unless you're booked into an F suite, you are better off with a short-hop Trans Tasman in Aussie, stretch your legs instead of a sub-par Y and J product for 17 hours non-stop... unless you REALLY value that extra 3 hours shaved by the direct service, which would connect you to almost the same onwards Europe flights anyway.

Of course they'd be generous in waiving any change fees for you to switch to the direct service, no doubt to help fill the plane up... like someone mentioned above, notice how Emirates nor the NZ media even makes mention of the utter sardine can that is Economy on their 777? Yeah... I wouldn't too if I work for EK PR...
Agree about F and J products - although, I prefer the J service on the 777 fleet much more than the A380 seat and find 12hr flights in the J product adequate (YMMV), but there is one thing about the Y product on the 77L - assuming it's not going to be very busy because of everyone saying the seat width is awful compared with the 777 product, that means someone travelling on it is more likely to get a whole row, or seat next them free, which is much better than being on a full A380

Also, the 2-4-2 seats at the back of the 777 are better for aisle pax because the feeling of comfort in a seat is really about the shoulder width rather than seat pitch, imho.
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 10:54 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Skywards
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
Agree about F and J products - although, I prefer the J service on the 777 fleet much more than the A380 seat and find 12hr flights in the J product adequate (YMMV), but there is one thing about the Y product on the 77L - assuming it's not going to be very busy because of everyone saying the seat width is awful compared with the 777 product, that means someone travelling on it is more likely to get a whole row, or seat next them free, which is much better than being on a full A380

Also, the 2-4-2 seats at the back of the 777 are better for aisle pax because the feeling of comfort in a seat is really about the shoulder width rather than seat pitch, imho.
I have anyway stops in Asia in the routing so not an option however thought maybe someone (booked in Y) is willing to fly it direct - at least it is free of charge.

Totally agree would never fly direkt in the 777
kuroko is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 10:58 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,454
Originally Posted by kuroko
I have anyway stops in Asia in the routing so not an option however thought maybe someone (booked in Y) is willing to fly it direct - at least it is free of charge.

Totally agree would never fly direkt in the 777
Except if I had a guaranteed row of 4 in Y!

F excepted of course!
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 11:31 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Skywards
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
Except if I had a guaranteed row of 4 in Y!

F excepted of course!
Of course but you wont have it guaranteed (officially at least )

Think it's a good way to move people from the always busy AU flights to the direct flight to NZ. A lot of people are saying here that they wont fly that long etc however people from AKL have now the possibility with a 1 stopp connection to nearly every destination (and vice versa) and some of them are going to take time over comfort (and to be honest 15h in a 777 in Y or 13.5h in a 380 - are both flights you'll need a wheelchair )
kuroko is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 11:23 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxon, UK
Programs: Mucci des canapes, Skywards Gold, BAEC, IC Plat Amb, LH FTV
Posts: 1,952
Well I've decided to give it a try outbound in April as I will appreciate a few extra hours in AKL. It looks like a long stretch even up front - I will report back. Returning from CHC and will take the leisurely route - 777 to SYD and then connect to the 380 service to DXB
pomkiwi is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 11:13 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: MAN DXB ✈️
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 6,831
Originally Posted by pomkiwi
Well I've decided to give it a try outbound in April as I will appreciate a few extra hours in AKL. It looks like a long stretch even up front - I will report back. Returning from CHC and will take the leisurely route - 777 to SYD and then connect to the 380 service to DXB
For me personally for that distance its A380 in F every time.

17 hours in J or even in Suites on a 777 is too much - I'd appreciate the shower and bar to stretch the legs.
m3red is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 12:25 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxon, UK
Programs: Mucci des canapes, Skywards Gold, BAEC, IC Plat Amb, LH FTV
Posts: 1,952
Originally Posted by m3red
For me personally for that distance its A380 in F every time.

17 hours in J or even in Suites on a 777 is too much - I'd appreciate the shower and bar to stretch the legs.
I think that I probably agree with you - hence the homeward routing. Going out however the 3 hours or so will make a difference - and it's only 15hrs 55mins
pomkiwi is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2016, 11:54 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,415
Looks like AKL-DXB EK449 on 2/3/16 is now to be operated by an A388 rather than the 77L.

They haven't changed the rest of the week yet, wonder if its just high loads or they are having second thoughts about the 77L range on this route?

It will be tight with 4x EK A388 all in AKL at once
cavemanzk is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2016, 1:42 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,801
Originally Posted by cavemanzk
Looks like AKL-DXB EK449 on 2/3/16 is now to be operated by an A388 rather than the 77L.

They haven't changed the rest of the week yet, wonder if its just high loads or they are having second thoughts about the 77L range on this route?

It will be tight with 4x EK A388 all in AKL at once
77L has a minimally longer theoretical range. On 28 April I see a A388 direct but with a technical stop in MEL subtly mentioned, perhaps you missed this and that A388 is actually also stopping over in MEL on the way? Other days end of April are still 77L
skywardhunter is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.