Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > DiningBuzz
Reload this Page >

Yelp's Top 100 in the USA

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Yelp's Top 100 in the USA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2016, 12:52 pm
  #16  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
Originally Posted by azepine00
The list is based on yelp reviews with corresponding demographics.
I've been to probably a dozen (incl 1, 15, 16, 17) - they are all good and inexpensive places. This is not michelin etc formal dining but rather the kind of food i can afford to grab pretty much every day. (to address CMK10 comment - los agaves has some very good and some rather generic dishes just like most of them)
Well you say this isn't Michelin Star dining but Per Se and Eleven Madison Park are on the list too so it seems to be to be all over the place.
CMK10 is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2016, 3:26 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Motown
Programs: DL, WN, AA, IHG Diamond, Hertz 5*
Posts: 3,409
Why does anyone take Yelp seriously? I find the posts to be mostly whiney millenials who like to say extremely nasty things about a restaurant if the bus boy looks at them strangely.
DavidDTW is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2016, 3:26 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,925
Cochon Butcher in New Orleans is good, but it's the NOLA representative on this Top 100 list???

How amusing.
FLYMSY is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2016, 3:47 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by DavidDTW
Why does anyone take Yelp seriously? I find the posts to be mostly whiney millenials who like to say extremely nasty things about a restaurant if the bus boy looks at them strangely.
Maybe it depends on the city and the particular restaurants. San Diego's listings don't seem too bad to me, for instance. Then again, I use Yelp mostly to find businesses and don't really pay too much attention to the reviews unless the business scores less than 4/5 or so.
tmiw is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2016, 4:18 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSY; 2-time FT Fantasy Football Champ, now in recovery.
Programs: AA lifetime GLD; UA Silver; Marriott LTTE; IHG Plat,
Posts: 14,518
The methodology is interesting, and may explain some of the quirks.

Businesses from across the country were compared using a ranking that looks at both the ratings and the number of reviews while accounting for quality, popularity, and statistical fluctuations. To localize the list, only reviews written by users whose profiles list their home location as within the reviewed businesses’ country were factored into the ranking.
The localization may end up penalizing especially east coast cities with multiple counties in the metro area. DC restaurants would exclude all the MD & VA residents who dine in the district; Manhattan restaurants would exclude workers from the other boroughs and NJ...
swag is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2016, 10:38 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SNA
Posts: 18,240
County or country?
VickiSoCal is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 7:14 am
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: south of WAS DC
Posts: 10,131
the only values i have found in yelp is the accuracy of the address, and the phone number of the place.
slawecki is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 9:20 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
Originally Posted by swag
The methodology is interesting, and may explain some of the quirks.



The localization may end up penalizing especially east coast cities with multiple counties in the metro area. DC restaurants would exclude all the MD & VA residents who dine in the district; Manhattan restaurants would exclude workers from the other boroughs and NJ...
That depends how localization works, as, i.e., The French Laundry is on the list, but very few Yelp diners would live within the same city, or even county, as the restaurant. However, a substantial percentage would live within 60 miles. And most of these would have a 94xxx zip code (same as the restaurant).
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 12:35 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SNA
Posts: 18,240
To localize the list, only reviews written by users whose profiles list their home location as within the reviewed businesses’ country were factored into the ranking.

Why is everyone reading county?
VickiSoCal is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 12:46 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
Originally Posted by VickiSoCal
To localize the list, only reviews written by users whose profiles list their home location as within the reviewed businesses’ country were factored into the ranking.

Why is everyone reading county?
You're assuming we can read.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 2:34 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,285
I've been a regular Yelp user & contributor for several years and I've only been to one of these restaurants. Ironically the lowest on the list (#100). And that one restaurant cemented for me my current method of using Yelp: I look for businesses that are well reviewed on Yelp but not too well reviewed. A restaurant with a few dozen reviews and a strong average? Probably a solid place. A restaurant with thousands of raves? That's past the tipping point where crowd sourcing becomes groupthink.
darthbimmer is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 6:04 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: City of Angels
Programs: DL Kettle| HH Pot
Posts: 525
Interesting. Past Yelp Top 100s seemed more exciting. I've been to about a dozen on this list. While some were deserving, some definitely were not. But its another list to review and there are a couple spots that I want to try that I've never heard of.
EmptyKim is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 8:24 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: BOI
Posts: 223
Yelp's Top 100- I would think the list would be more useful as a reference for restaurants to avoid than as a list of restaurants I'd want to patronize. Granted both types of restaurants are bound to be on the list, but if one were to choose randomly, the likelihood of a miss would be much greater than the chance of finding a great restaurant.
travellingwineO is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 9:12 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
The problem with this list, and any put together from public ratings, is that it's more aligned with "exceeded expectations of the clientele" than "best". Check triapadvisor - you'll see very, very good Holiday Inn Expresses and Sheraton's at the top sometimes. They're very good for the price, and greatly exceed the norm for folks who stay there. But they're not Four Season's.

But if you're looking for a very good inexpensive restaurant, it's not a bad list to review. But food preferences vary so much, even the best list will be hit-or-miss for each person.
CPRich is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 10:22 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Plat Pro, UA Silver, DL Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,851
Atlanta--in fact all of Georgia--has only one place on the list, and it's a cheapo little lunch spot in Midtown. Whatta joke. Seems to me someone at Yelp HQ needed to spend a little more time composing this list and adjusting criteria.
sky303 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.