'TSA official responsible for security lapses earned big bonuses'
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
'TSA official responsible for security lapses earned big bonuses'
This is so true: https://www.revealnews.org/article/t...d-big-bonuses/
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
This is so true: https://www.revealnews.org/article/t...d-big-bonuses/
Are 'regular' TSA employees - the folks I see at the checkpoint and who screen my checked bags - are they also eligible for cash awards, performance awards and bonuses?
Or are these just perks for the suits?
#4
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Speaking as a career Federal employee and a somewhat higher level manager have had up to 150 people work for me I can say every employee is eligible for awards and bonuses. Technically all are somewhat tied to performance. Some are scaled according to their grade or their specific pay and some are generic in the sense that the upward limit is set by OPM and agency policies and guidelines. Naturally Senior Executive Service employees are at the upper end of the food chain and like any business being boss is better in a lot of ways.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Speaking as a career Federal employee and a somewhat higher level manager have had up to 150 people work for me I can say every employee is eligible for awards and bonuses. Technically all are somewhat tied to performance. Some are scaled according to their grade or their specific pay and some are generic in the sense that the upward limit is set by OPM and agency policies and guidelines. Naturally Senior Executive Service employees are at the upper end of the food chain and like any business being boss is better in a lot of ways.
Federal employee pay is published by OPM on various pay schedules. Where does the authority derive from to pay more than that employee is entitled to per their grade and step?
#6
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Buried in the policies and guidelines there is a caveat or caveats that allow an agency to pay above the grade and step for a particularly highly qualified employee. Usually the authority to do so rest with the agency head and is highly restrictive. There are also special groups or classes of employees who qualify for what is generally called "professional pay" which is above and beyond the grade and step scale. Examples are doctors, scientist, and lawyers though the agency may add other professions or individuals. None of this has any bearing on awards, bonuses, or other incentives which are above and beyond the salary caps.
#8
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
#10
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Somewhat. I wish we were on GS.
But ATSA required TSA essentially adopt the FAA's personnel and compensation system. FAA transitioned to their pay band "core compensation" system a year before 9/11. So, just like FAA, TSA has a "core compensation" pay band system instead of the GS grade and step system.
But ATSA required TSA essentially adopt the FAA's personnel and compensation system. FAA transitioned to their pay band "core compensation" system a year before 9/11. So, just like FAA, TSA has a "core compensation" pay band system instead of the GS grade and step system.
#11
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Somewhat. I wish we were on GS.
But ATSA required TSA essentially adopt the FAA's personnel and compensation system. FAA transitioned to their pay band "core compensation" system a year before 9/11. So, just like FAA, TSA has a "core compensation" pay band system instead of the GS grade and step system.
But ATSA required TSA essentially adopt the FAA's personnel and compensation system. FAA transitioned to their pay band "core compensation" system a year before 9/11. So, just like FAA, TSA has a "core compensation" pay band system instead of the GS grade and step system.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 221
TSA was supposed to comply YESTERDAY with misconduct probe of TSA senior executives :
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...p-due-2-19.pdf
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz wrote:
"Your unwillingness to allow those witnesses to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews may require the Committee to issue subpoenas that compel their testimony under oath, among other things."
In December the Committee launched a probe into misconduct among TSA senior executives, and also an inquiry into how the agency handles misconduct.
https://www.revealnews.org/blog/tsa-...conduct-probe/
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...p-due-2-19.pdf
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz wrote:
"Your unwillingness to allow those witnesses to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews may require the Committee to issue subpoenas that compel their testimony under oath, among other things."
In December the Committee launched a probe into misconduct among TSA senior executives, and also an inquiry into how the agency handles misconduct.
https://www.revealnews.org/blog/tsa-...conduct-probe/
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
TSA was supposed to comply YESTERDAY with misconduct probe of TSA senior executives :
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...p-due-2-19.pdf
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz wrote:
"Your unwillingness to allow those witnesses to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews may require the Committee to issue subpoenas that compel their testimony under oath, among other things."
In December the Committee launched a probe into misconduct among TSA senior executives, and also an inquiry into how the agency handles misconduct.
https://www.revealnews.org/blog/tsa-...conduct-probe/
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...p-due-2-19.pdf
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz wrote:
"Your unwillingness to allow those witnesses to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews may require the Committee to issue subpoenas that compel their testimony under oath, among other things."
In December the Committee launched a probe into misconduct among TSA senior executives, and also an inquiry into how the agency handles misconduct.
https://www.revealnews.org/blog/tsa-...conduct-probe/
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
I believe that the corporate culture is responsible for much of TSA's problems. TSA is not, nor has it ever been, on the front lines of the war on terror. TSA screeners are not law enforcement, not sworn officers, and their appearance in fake cop garb sends the wrong message. The excessive, heavy handed secrecy employed by TSA also is off putting. Not everything TSA does is or should be SSI. I agree that senior TSA management is significant problem as is everyone else in TSA including the people hired today.
Example of a TSA problem: Retaliatation. Example, transiting MIA TSA. Exiting WBI a screener made a sudden move towards me and I stepped back. He said something and I responded that I was having trouble hearing him so he spoke even softer and became threatening best I could tell. I was able to catch a word here and there but the gist was I wasn't cooperating when the problem was I couldn't hear over the checkpoint noise and the screener refused to accomodate my poor hearing. I left the checkpoint with a poor opinion of that screener, TSA MIA, and TSA in general which reinforced my already negative opinion of TSA.
The model TSA is operating under is flawed. Passengers are not the enemy, we are not convicts, nor are we trying to harm our fellow travelers. I realize that screeners are finding some handguns, knives, and other weapons but in reality those items represent a tiny fraction of travelers. I support criminal prosecution of anyone who carries a weapon into a checkpoint but not the kangaroo court of an Administrative Law Judge. I think that TSA should restructure and limit itself to screening for WEI only. No BDO, no ID checks, no TSA BS.
TSA is its own worst enemy!
Example of a TSA problem: Retaliatation. Example, transiting MIA TSA. Exiting WBI a screener made a sudden move towards me and I stepped back. He said something and I responded that I was having trouble hearing him so he spoke even softer and became threatening best I could tell. I was able to catch a word here and there but the gist was I wasn't cooperating when the problem was I couldn't hear over the checkpoint noise and the screener refused to accomodate my poor hearing. I left the checkpoint with a poor opinion of that screener, TSA MIA, and TSA in general which reinforced my already negative opinion of TSA.
The model TSA is operating under is flawed. Passengers are not the enemy, we are not convicts, nor are we trying to harm our fellow travelers. I realize that screeners are finding some handguns, knives, and other weapons but in reality those items represent a tiny fraction of travelers. I support criminal prosecution of anyone who carries a weapon into a checkpoint but not the kangaroo court of an Administrative Law Judge. I think that TSA should restructure and limit itself to screening for WEI only. No BDO, no ID checks, no TSA BS.
TSA is its own worst enemy!