Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

'TSA official responsible for security lapses earned big bonuses'

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

'TSA official responsible for security lapses earned big bonuses'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2016, 9:18 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
'TSA official responsible for security lapses earned big bonuses'

This is so true: https://www.revealnews.org/article/t...d-big-bonuses/
eyecue is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2016, 9:36 am
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
Originally Posted by eyecue
eyecue, I don't know if you are allowed to answer this:

Are 'regular' TSA employees - the folks I see at the checkpoint and who screen my checked bags - are they also eligible for cash awards, performance awards and bonuses?

Or are these just perks for the suits?
chollie is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2016, 9:39 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
PM me I would love to shed light on this. Short answer is yes.
eyecue is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2016, 11:07 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by chollie
eyecue, I don't know if you are allowed to answer this:

Are 'regular' TSA employees - the folks I see at the checkpoint and who screen my checked bags - are they also eligible for cash awards, performance awards and bonuses?

Or are these just perks for the suits?
Speaking as a career Federal employee and a somewhat higher level manager have had up to 150 people work for me I can say every employee is eligible for awards and bonuses. Technically all are somewhat tied to performance. Some are scaled according to their grade or their specific pay and some are generic in the sense that the upward limit is set by OPM and agency policies and guidelines. Naturally Senior Executive Service employees are at the upper end of the food chain and like any business being boss is better in a lot of ways.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2016, 11:28 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by Randyk47
Speaking as a career Federal employee and a somewhat higher level manager have had up to 150 people work for me I can say every employee is eligible for awards and bonuses. Technically all are somewhat tied to performance. Some are scaled according to their grade or their specific pay and some are generic in the sense that the upward limit is set by OPM and agency policies and guidelines. Naturally Senior Executive Service employees are at the upper end of the food chain and like any business being boss is better in a lot of ways.
Perhaps you can answer this question.

Federal employee pay is published by OPM on various pay schedules. Where does the authority derive from to pay more than that employee is entitled to per their grade and step?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2016, 7:10 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Perhaps you can answer this question.

Federal employee pay is published by OPM on various pay schedules. Where does the authority derive from to pay more than that employee is entitled to per their grade and step?
Buried in the policies and guidelines there is a caveat or caveats that allow an agency to pay above the grade and step for a particularly highly qualified employee. Usually the authority to do so rest with the agency head and is highly restrictive. There are also special groups or classes of employees who qualify for what is generally called "professional pay" which is above and beyond the grade and step scale. Examples are doctors, scientist, and lawyers though the agency may add other professions or individuals. None of this has any bearing on awards, bonuses, or other incentives which are above and beyond the salary caps.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2016, 4:07 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
Remember though that TSA is not under title 5.
eyecue is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 5:57 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by eyecue
Remember though that TSA is not under title 5.
Yes. No GS and SES. Instead we have pay-for-performance pay bands with the pay code of SV for us TSOs. And SW for the TSES (the TSA version of the Senior Executive Service [SES]).

Hoggan is TSES.
LoganTSO is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2016, 6:40 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by LoganTSO
Yes. No GS and SES. Instead we have pay-for-performance pay bands with the pay code of SV for us TSOs. And SW for the TSES (the TSA version of the Senior Executive Service [SES]).

Hoggan is TSES.
TSA even screwed up the payroll.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 6:37 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA even screwed up the payroll.
Somewhat. I wish we were on GS.

But ATSA required TSA essentially adopt the FAA's personnel and compensation system. FAA transitioned to their pay band "core compensation" system a year before 9/11. So, just like FAA, TSA has a "core compensation" pay band system instead of the GS grade and step system.
LoganTSO is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2016, 8:51 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by LoganTSO
Somewhat. I wish we were on GS.

But ATSA required TSA essentially adopt the FAA's personnel and compensation system. FAA transitioned to their pay band "core compensation" system a year before 9/11. So, just like FAA, TSA has a "core compensation" pay band system instead of the GS grade and step system.
DoD had the abortive National Security Personnel System (NSPS) from 2006 to 2012. It was a pay band system with supposedly more emphasis on performance. The unions were heavily against it and pressed the Obama administration to do away with the system and succeeded in 2009 with an effective date of 1 January 2012 to return all DoD employees back to the GS pay and performance system. My take was it was a good system for higher graded or banded employees and maybe not so good for the rest. Of course a lot depended on performance and how well your supervisor was in working the very complicated system to document that performance. Will say that it set up a very competitive bidding system for new or transferring employees and during the three full years it was in place some, even at the lower levels, did very well.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2016, 2:53 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 221
TSA was supposed to comply YESTERDAY with misconduct probe of TSA senior executives :

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...p-due-2-19.pdf

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz wrote:

"Your unwillingness to allow those witnesses to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews may require the Committee to issue subpoenas that compel their testimony under oath, among other things."

In December the Committee launched a probe into misconduct among TSA senior executives, and also an inquiry into how the agency handles misconduct.

https://www.revealnews.org/blog/tsa-...conduct-probe/
willpolice4food is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2016, 3:40 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by willpolice4food
TSA was supposed to comply YESTERDAY with misconduct probe of TSA senior executives :

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...p-due-2-19.pdf

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz wrote:

"Your unwillingness to allow those witnesses to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews may require the Committee to issue subpoenas that compel their testimony under oath, among other things."

In December the Committee launched a probe into misconduct among TSA senior executives, and also an inquiry into how the agency handles misconduct.

https://www.revealnews.org/blog/tsa-...conduct-probe/
Misconduct by TSA employees? How could that be?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2016, 6:18 pm
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Misconduct by TSA employees? How could that be?
When the roots are rotting, the whole tree dies.
eyecue is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2016, 8:07 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by eyecue
When the roots are rotting, the whole tree dies.
I believe that the corporate culture is responsible for much of TSA's problems. TSA is not, nor has it ever been, on the front lines of the war on terror. TSA screeners are not law enforcement, not sworn officers, and their appearance in fake cop garb sends the wrong message. The excessive, heavy handed secrecy employed by TSA also is off putting. Not everything TSA does is or should be SSI. I agree that senior TSA management is significant problem as is everyone else in TSA including the people hired today.

Example of a TSA problem: Retaliatation. Example, transiting MIA TSA. Exiting WBI a screener made a sudden move towards me and I stepped back. He said something and I responded that I was having trouble hearing him so he spoke even softer and became threatening best I could tell. I was able to catch a word here and there but the gist was I wasn't cooperating when the problem was I couldn't hear over the checkpoint noise and the screener refused to accomodate my poor hearing. I left the checkpoint with a poor opinion of that screener, TSA MIA, and TSA in general which reinforced my already negative opinion of TSA.

The model TSA is operating under is flawed. Passengers are not the enemy, we are not convicts, nor are we trying to harm our fellow travelers. I realize that screeners are finding some handguns, knives, and other weapons but in reality those items represent a tiny fraction of travelers. I support criminal prosecution of anyone who carries a weapon into a checkpoint but not the kangaroo court of an Administrative Law Judge. I think that TSA should restructure and limit itself to screening for WEI only. No BDO, no ID checks, no TSA BS.

TSA is its own worst enemy!
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.