Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

A "twelve hour" overstay in the U.S. results in 21+ days locked up by CBP/ICE

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A "twelve hour" overstay in the U.S. results in 21+ days locked up by CBP/ICE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2015, 3:05 pm
  #16  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
The moral of the story seems to be that abuses of the VWP will not be tolerated by DHS and if you want to visit the United States for more than a brief B1/B2 stay, you need to get a visa rather than show up and lie about your intentions.
Ari is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 3:10 pm
  #17  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by cestmoi123
While it does make more sense that she'd be looking for legal avenues to return to the US, why would she go to the Aussie embassy to pursue these?
Because Australian consular officials may provide advice on such matters or are thought to perhaps provide advice/assistance on such matters.

Originally Posted by cestmoi123
Again, if I'm a US citizen in Germany, and I'm trying to figure out how to stay in Germany longer, I don't go to the US embassy in Switzerland for advice.
Quite clearly you must not have spent significant time working or observing ACS at US Embassies or Consulates in Europe or you would know that some US citizens in Germany would go to the U.S. Embassy in Bern or otherwise seek consular assistance via ACS in Switzerland.

ACS = American Citizen Services.


Originally Posted by cestmoi123
This leaves aside the issue of why you'd travel from NH to any Aussie embassy unless you needed something that can only be provided in person at that embassy.
To avoid/minimize overstaying and to get information or otherwise try to get regularized to return to being in compliance; in other words, the proverbial "to kill two birds with one stone".

NH isn't so far from Canada. It borders Canada.

Originally Posted by cestmoi123
Thinking about it, the only scenario that does make sense to me is that she was going to Canada to (a) reset the clock, and (b) visit the US embassy in Ottawa, in order to get advice there on how to return to the US for a longer period of time.
That is not the only scenario that makes sense, even as it may be the only scenario of which you know that makes sense to you.

The tales of what ACS faces when dealing with US citizens are legend. I'm sure the Australian equivalent of ACS has its own equivalent.

Last edited by GUWonder; Apr 17, 2015 at 3:19 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 3:16 pm
  #18  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Ari
The moral of the story seems to be that abuses of the VWP will not be tolerated by DHS and if you want to visit the United States for more than a brief B1/B2 stay, you need to get a visa rather than show up and lie about your intentions.
Did she lie about her intentions? While CBP may have assumed/concluded she was engaged in a lie about the nature of her trip, I am not sure she did.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 4:20 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by GUWonder
She followed the advice of CBSA. If not for that, perhaps the outcome would be different.
Agreed, the outcome would be different.

But it wasn't different because she took advice from a non-lawyer: a law enforcement officer in cahoots with his colleagues on the other side of the border. The CBSA officer knew what was going to happen. It's shameful that he did this, even more so that he did this to a kid and a fellow CommonWealth citizen.

Cops lie. She was naive. Now she knows better.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:10 pm
  #20  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Did she lie about her intentions?
It seems like she met a guy overseas, followed him here with vague plans to spend an indeterminate amount of time here with him before possibly getting married and, at some point, decided to go on a 5-year bus trip; that doesn't fall under the VWP.

Carter, 26, and McCrohan, 24, who grew up in Brisbane, Australia, had met at the Glion Institute of Higher Education in Switzerland. Carter, who saved some money while working as a sales coordinator for a luxury hotel in Manhattan, talked McCrohan into joining him on a magical mystery tour.

McCrohan told the Register in January: “It is a big life change. Maybe it’s a bit outside my comfort zone. But it’s an opportunity that’s much greater than sitting at home.”

. . .

The couple, who plan to be married, face more bureaucratic obstacles in the future. When McCrohan gets back to Australia, she will be prohibited from returning to America for 10 years. Chauncey Carter intends to fly to Australia this weekend to join her.
http://www.nhregister.com/lifestyle/...ration-trouble
Ari is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:55 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 596
Did the Australian Govt or Consular officials try to ease her problems at all after the arrest and detention ?

All these countries wanna cooperate and help each other to catch the bad guys and facilitate travelers yet they don't miss a chance to take a shot at an Australian girl. So what if she overstayed? What happened to the commonwealth and being from a western country, and all?

If each country is going to treat all foreigners like this, then why all the fuss and focus on "increased cooperations" everywhere?
cdn1 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2015, 12:00 am
  #22  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by mre5765
Agreed, the outcome would be different.

But it wasn't different because she took advice from a non-lawyer: a law enforcement officer in cahoots with his colleagues on the other side of the border. The CBSA officer knew what was going to happen. It's shameful that he did this, even more so that he did this to a kid and a fellow CommonWealth citizen.

Cops lie. She was naive. Now she knows better.
I'm not so sure the CBSA lied to her or that she took the bait of a lying CBSA employee. For life's hiccups that involve barely missing the stay deadline due to travel delays or illness, there are procedures that allow for such things to not necessarily be held against a person who used the VWP to enter the US.

Originally Posted by Ari
It seems like she met a guy overseas, followed him here with vague plans to spend an indeterminate amount of time here with him before possibly getting married and, at some point, decided to go on a 5-year bus trip; that doesn't fall under the VWP.
But did she lie about her intentions? I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that she lied about her intentions. The VWP doesn't prohibit meeting and following a romantic interest and having vague plans subject to change that may include possibly getting married. The VWP does prohibit other things.

Leaving the U.S. -- after entry on the VWP -- due to a change of plans that require a change of status (so as not to avoid violating VWP conditions), and then return to the U.S. by not using the VWP seems to be what she was seeking to do.

She seemed to have been making a deliberate effort to try to comply with the terms applicable to her stay under the VWP.

Last edited by GUWonder; Apr 18, 2015 at 12:16 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2015, 8:37 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
they do this when they dont detain or deport illegals?
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 12:45 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,225
A massive overreaction. They could have simply banned her from re-entering the USA and told her to enter Canada and never come back to the USA as she had overstayed and was no longer welcome. What's the point of holding her in jail like a common criminal for 21 days? Disgusting.
travelinmanS is online now  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 12:59 am
  #25  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
A massive overreaction. They could have simply banned her from re-entering the USA and told her to enter Canada and never come back to the USA as she had overstayed and was no longer welcome. What's the point of holding her in jail like a common criminal for 21 days? Disgusting.
It's definitely what I would call a disgusting waste of resources derived of an overreaction by DHS and of the logistical constrains that are a result of not wasting resources. An interesting mix to say the least.

At the northern border land crossings, removals from the U.S. of non-admissible, non-Canadian persons takes much longer than at many major US airports of entry. Part of it is the logistics of holding the person, planning the transport, and finally getting the person to an airport for the flights out.

A typical Schengen Zone citizen, for example, denied entry to the U.S. at JFK or EWR due to attempt to misuse VWP is back on the ground in Europe within less than 72 hours -- usually substantially less than 72 hours. It's just easier to get the airlines to fly them out of the airport when they are already so close to the gate for the international flights "back home".
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 11:42 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
Originally Posted by mre5765
Young kid, takes bad legal advice from a non-lawyer, doesn't realize the CBP and CBSA are in cahoots. Pity. But the young, naive, and ignorant often learn from the school of Hard Knocks.

She overstayed. Whether it was ignorance (she was unaware how long she overstayed? She doesn't know how to set a reminder on her phone at say +85 days that it is time to pack up and leave?) or deliberate, she overstayed.

While I decry the disproportionate response and the unfairness (the government gives amnesty to some ethnic groups but denies amnesty to a white Australian from a VWP country), I don't have a lot of sympathy. It was a simple rule to follow and she blew it.

She now has a valuable life lesson.

I have overstayed visas many times in many countries. The penalty is typically having to pay a fine of 5 or 10 dollars per day of overstay. The only "lesson" she has learned is that the worlds only hyperpower is governed by lunatics.
Blogndog is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 12:04 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
lot of misguided conjecture here. what she did was perfectly logical , she just did it a few hours too late. and everyone does "visa runs", why the insinuations that there is something nefarious about "re-setting the clock"?
Blogndog is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 9:59 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,426
Originally Posted by Blogndog
lot of misguided conjecture here. what she did was perfectly logical , she just did it a few hours too late. and everyone does "visa runs", why the insinuations that there is something nefarious about "re-setting the clock"?
There isn't anything generally nefarious about it but the US government doesn't like it and in this case travel to Canada does NT reset it.
Xyzzy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.