TSA Stumped by Nobel Prize
#31
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Houston / Philadelphia
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 276
No one is disagreeing with the importance of the TSA.
We just all have different opinions of their efficiency or effectiveness based on our own experiences and travels.
We just all have different opinions of their efficiency or effectiveness based on our own experiences and travels.
To win a nobel prize I would bet he is smart enough to know he was answering as a smarta$$ to them without explaining what was the "block of gold". And which poster talked about their experience except for repacking their bag?
Might I suggest you start at the top of the thread and see the evolution of comments. Funny, sarcastic, critical etc and all examples of our great democracies at work.
#33
You need to look in a thesaurus for "stringent" and see if "lunacy" or "all for show" are synonyms.
#36
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: Marriott Titanium, National EE
Posts: 538
Yes the increased security after 911 is mostly for show but that's what we the public demanded for after 911. People quickly blamed the lax security for 911 and that's what we gotten. Just like the current Ebola outbreak. The reality is there is no good way to prevent someone who did the proper research and planning from blowing up a plane. In the same way, there is no good way to prevent a possible Ebola carrier from entering the country. I'm sure the TSA has already realized how ineffective the post 911 security theater is, however if they relax things and something happens, the first thing the people & media are going to do is blame TSA / government for relaxing security. Why would TSA take the risk even through it may be the right think to do?
#37
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
#38
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
When did you come through GSO? Next time coffee is on me (or at least what Dunkin Donuts calls coffee).
#39
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
When did I say a person was not allowed to express their opinions? Or are you trying to throw "freedom of speech" at me because unlike most posters on this thread, I actually supported the TSA's action in this instance with my "freedom of speech"?
Lots of folks on page 1 of this thread blasted the TSA completely including stating how long it should take for the process of questioning from a TSA agent i.e. 2-3 minutes. READ the article. How long did he say the agent took in questioning him? Oh wait, he didnt state. So it could of been 2-3 minutes. I mean, the length of time it would take for him to be asked and to state the answers he stated and for his bag to be checked would be approximately 2-3 mins. Basically he himself whined about being questioned by the TSA and it sparked this thread. Thats all their is to it IMO. He tried to make fun of the fact that the TSA did not know what the object was on their screening. I also stand by my comment that I do not believe most ppl on here in TSA's shoes would know that the medal would show as pure black in the scanner.
To win a nobel prize I would bet he is smart enough to know he was answering as a smarta$$ to them without explaining what was the "block of gold". And which poster talked about their experience except for repacking their bag?
i did read it very well thank you. Might I suggest you read it and most importantly understand what was written by the posters, subject of the article, and myself.
Lots of folks on page 1 of this thread blasted the TSA completely including stating how long it should take for the process of questioning from a TSA agent i.e. 2-3 minutes. READ the article. How long did he say the agent took in questioning him? Oh wait, he didnt state. So it could of been 2-3 minutes. I mean, the length of time it would take for him to be asked and to state the answers he stated and for his bag to be checked would be approximately 2-3 mins. Basically he himself whined about being questioned by the TSA and it sparked this thread. Thats all their is to it IMO. He tried to make fun of the fact that the TSA did not know what the object was on their screening. I also stand by my comment that I do not believe most ppl on here in TSA's shoes would know that the medal would show as pure black in the scanner.
To win a nobel prize I would bet he is smart enough to know he was answering as a smarta$$ to them without explaining what was the "block of gold". And which poster talked about their experience except for repacking their bag?
i did read it very well thank you. Might I suggest you read it and most importantly understand what was written by the posters, subject of the article, and myself.
#42
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 662
In the last 10 years of working in my checkpoint, I can count on one hand the number of bags I have not offered to repack after a bag check (and those were not offered because the bag was already repacked). Others may not do it regularly, but I have always done it, always will do it, and any time I train someone or work with others, I do my best to make sure they do the same thing. I am sorry if that has not been the case for you, it is a shame.
#43
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Sorry, I disagree. I would never want a TSA screener re-packing my bag. In fact the screeners should not unpack the bags for inspection, either. I would much prefer to open my own bag and allow the screener to view whatever is inside rather than have the screener take things out. The more often a screener touches a passenger's bag, the more likely a theft will occur.
The only thing I (and by protocol, every other TSO) should be interested in is clearing the item that is identified as a possible threat - and in some rare cases, something idetified as dangerous or illegal while looking for that possible threat item.
TSOs search for the item instead of the passenger pulling it out as a matter of safety (not allowing a passenger with a threat item to use it against the folks in the checkpoint) as well as communication (the TSO knows the shape/design of the item they are looking for). I understand your opinions and wishes on this, as well as your fears of theft, but I do not see what you suggest being a change in process any time soon.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Bag Search At LAX
Sorry, I disagree. I would never want a TSA screener re-packing my bag. In fact the screeners should not unpack the bags for inspection, either. I would much prefer to open my own bag and allow the screener to view whatever is inside rather than have the screener take things out. The more often a screener touches a passenger's bag, the more likely a theft will occur.
A small victory for the People.
#45
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
But back on topic ...