IAD Secondary BP Check
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA Gold, SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 991
IAD Secondary BP Check
TSA at IAD is "testing" an additional look at boarding passes right before passing through the x-ray and scanners (right after the ID check). What's the point of this additional check? Is the TSA afraid passengers are sneaking around the ID checks?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
From time to time, I've seen supervisory clerks right behind the ID checkers doing a second ID check 5' from the first checkers. A while back, when I asked one of them why he needed to look at the same BP less than 10 feet away from the previous check, he got quite annoyed with me.
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Completely inane, but better than Heathrow. Last time through there I had the BP & ID checked five times in the space of 20 feet. They get reeeeally snotty with you when you laugh at their stupid games.
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,595
They used to do it all the time a few years ago. They have probably reinstated it because they need to keep their staff busy.
#5
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Whether or not that is a useful expenditure of funds is ... well, a matter of some debate. (Lemme get my popcorn ...)
#6
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: DEN, or so it says...
Programs: UA1K/RCC, Avis CHM, NWA Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 2,885
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CPH
Programs: Delta SM
Posts: 497
We've seen plenty of reports here of passengers who pass through the TDC station with the wrong ID, a boarding pass that doesn't match the ID, a boarding pass for the wrong day ... heck, we've seen people get through without showing any ID or boarding pass at all. I suspect that the second check is mostly to verify that the first check was performed correctly.
Whether or not that is a useful expenditure of funds is ... well, a matter of some debate. (Lemme get my popcorn ...)
Whether or not that is a useful expenditure of funds is ... well, a matter of some debate. (Lemme get my popcorn ...)
Have you ever seen pictures of assembly lines at Foxconn where they assemble iPhones and iPads or an assembly line at a car factory? These people have one job to do and they seem to manage to do it right. How hard could it be to check an ID at security and get it right without having a second or third check in place? Could you imagine Ford having three checkers for every nut and bolt being put into an automobile?
Considering the failure rate of the x-ray people, it would seem to me that if they really cared about security and not justifying keeping the extra manpower on hand, the TSA would run all carry-on luggage through the x-ray machines twice, with a different security person in charge of the second scan.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Ex Platinum & 1MM, DL PLT, Marriott Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,490
While this may be new @ IAD, this is nothing new for the TSA. I had to fly out of EWR monthly for 18 mos & it happened every time.
#9
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
This is the price passengers are paying because screeners at SFO let a woman get through without a ticket/BP/ID.
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,595
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Considering the failure rate of the x-ray people, it would seem to me that if they really cared about security and not justifying keeping the extra manpower on hand, the TSA would run all carry-on luggage through the x-ray machines twice, with a different security person in charge of the second scan.
For xray you want remote viewing of contents where the screeners see multiple, randomized screen shots from multiple belts, and can pick out bags/items for follow up. Nice, quiet room away from the screening area itself where they can concentrate, have no idea what bag they're screening in terms of the pax in the screening area or if another screener has already passed it, where they work no more than 30 minutes on and 30 minutes off. The vast majority of screening should be done by automated object recognition systems where human screeners only view stuff the automated system flags along with a random number of live bags and some system input target object bags to "keep them awake" and check performance.
#13
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,790
Last edited by RadioGirl; Aug 17, 2014 at 8:44 pm
#14
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Yes, I enjoy trying to explain the unexplainable ... why do you ask?
#15
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
This. Once you stop viewing TSA as security and start understanding it as a jobs program for the otherwise unemployable, a lot of this makes more sense.
And how many of those people with the wrong ID, the non-matching ID, the wrong-day BP or the lack of ID turned out to be a danger to the aircraft? Do you know how hard it is to use "the wrong ID" to blow up a plane?
If it's that important, two checks is not enough. We need a panel of TDCs to vote on the validity of each ID:
And how many of those people with the wrong ID, the non-matching ID, the wrong-day BP or the lack of ID turned out to be a danger to the aircraft? Do you know how hard it is to use "the wrong ID" to blow up a plane?
If it's that important, two checks is not enough. We need a panel of TDCs to vote on the validity of each ID:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=db9Y7i-zTJY