Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Checks for Oversized Luggage at the Checkpoint?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Checks for Oversized Luggage at the Checkpoint?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2014, 3:36 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 580
Checks for Oversized Luggage at the Checkpoint?

I remember that for a brief period prior to the TSA, security checkpoints had devices to prevent oversized luggage from going through. My understanding was that at security, they did not enforce this type of thing.

This article http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014...?emc=eta1&_r=0 claims that United plans to start enforcing this at the security checkpoint. I was wondering how this works. Can one still get past security if one does not listen to a United official? Is the TSA now going to start enforcing this? How does it work at airports where terminals are connected and one is flying on another airline?
guflyer is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2014, 4:57 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
At some US airports, the airline or group of airlines control access of who gets into line/which line. It would be the airline/airline contractors at the front of such lines who would enforce things that the TSA shouldn't enforce -- such as airline's cabin baggage policy/practices.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 9:25 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Been traveling with a piece of cabin baggage lately. It's a pretty big bag, about the size of a 6 y/o child. TSA either asks me directly or comments under their breath. On each instance, a simple 'Don't worry about it" has quieted them.
tkey75 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 6:16 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 330
You can check the UA forum here at FT for a long thread on it already. The issue is not so much for the few who bring on oversized bags but UA will no longer allow musicians to bring valuable instruments such as a violin! Also charts or plans that fit in a tube will now be checked as most will be too long. And the new sizers are based on measurements of the bins on the smallest of the big jets as many slightly larget bags do fit on most planes but not a few, a literal one size fits all method.

The reality is that it has little to do with fairly allocating the overhead bins but everthing to do with increased revenue through checked bags.
Chrisinhouston is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 6:50 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Chrisinhouston
You can check the UA forum here at FT for a long thread on it already. The issue is not so much for the few who bring on oversized bags but UA will no longer allow musicians to bring valuable instruments such as a violin! Also charts or plans that fit in a tube will now be checked as most will be too long. And the new sizers are based on measurements of the bins on the smallest of the big jets as many slightly larget bags do fit on most planes but not a few, a literal one size fits all method.

The reality is that it has little to do with fairly allocating the overhead bins but everthing to do with increased revenue through checked bags.
Yes, it's a desperate money grab.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 7:01 pm
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,689
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Yes, it's a desperate money grab.
Think there's any chance they'll put some of that money to getting their IT up to par?
chollie is online now  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 7:26 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
UA does this very effectively at SFO. Effective enforcement of scammer carry-on bags means that people don't have to fight to be first to board.
Often1 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 11:05 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Often1
UA does this very effectively at SFO. Effective enforcement of scammer carry-on bags means that people don't have to fight to be first to board.
People still have to scramble to find overhead bin space at SFO when flying UA. So if that is the measure of effectiveness, then it doesn't speak well about UA being "very effective" in this area.

Originally Posted by chollie
Think there's any chance they'll put some of that money to getting their IT up to par?
Money is fungible; however, while they will put some of that money into IT, UA getting their IT up to par is far from certain.
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.