Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Rude, lazy, incompetent and too dumb to lie....

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Rude, lazy, incompetent and too dumb to lie....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2012, 12:52 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
Not sure I understand your point. The TSA has an interview process that one must pass in order to become a member. Society does not. One can be fired from the TSA by a single individual (called a boss). One cannot be so easily fired from society.

(And of course the good apples don't excuse the bad apples. Bad apples should always be weeded out of any organization whose job is to serve the public. I also don't think we're going to get there as long as anyone claims that 100% of TSA's employees are bad apples.)
its an arguement of linguistics.
bad apples in society are used as a reason to reduce our rights
bad apples in a company/agency are used as an excuse for unaddressed screwups.
avsfan733 is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 12:57 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Prescott, AZ
Programs: US, UA, Marriott, SPG, HH Silver
Posts: 173
Originally Posted by ryan182
well my previous attempt to point out an obvious violation of policy at another airport was met with: "the cards are over there" (points to box with cards) and the resumption of the discussion about weekend plans. Thus my surprise.
But what kind of violation was it? From what I've read it appears that supervisors seem to care a lot more regarding scanner policy violations (refusals to accept medical "opt-outs", refusals and forced delays regarding regular op-outs, etc) as well as ID issues than other complaints. Of course, I presume that the amount of people complaining about being refused an opt-out are minimal compared to complaints about confiscated shampoo.

Personally I haven't had any really bad experiences with TSA, other than they had me wait almost 10 minutes for a "male assist" back in June, but I arrived to the terminal 2 hours before my flight to prevent their waiting tactics from succeeding.

I did have a slightly similar experience to yours in ATL, where I was coming out of the secondary Customs inspection and got somewhat lost. I was traveling with a school group and the instructions were "Go out, follow the connecting flight signs, we'll meet by the elevator". We had gone through ATL just over a week before but we met somewhere else. I got lost because I lost my sense of direction when I went through secondary, and I had no idea where in the airport I was (turns out, I was just a few steps away from the regular exit), and I asked some TSA guy directions, essentially just asked him if that was the checkpoint that was after the regular customs inspection for connecting flights, or if there was an elevator nearby (in case the elevator was before the checkpoint), and his response was "If you're taking a connecting flight, go that way, if not, go this way", and every attempt to get more information got me the same response from before. At that point I decided to just go to that checkpoint and hope for the best, and as I got to the line I met with one of the teachers who was going with us, so I knew that if we were at the wrong checkpoint, at least I was saved from any kind of punishment (turns out I wasn't the only one who didn't know if it was the right checkpoint). And yes, it was the regular checkpoint.

I was 16 and anxious to catch another international connection to go home so I didn't complain or anything (pretty sure I didn't know that was worth it, or even possible).
felipegarcia is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 12:58 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
I have a new job for that TSO. Think he would like to be Australian Transport Minister? Sounds like he'd do a better job then the current one.

Why are they called "bad apples", why not something like "bad bananas"?
Himeno is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 1:02 am
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,685
Originally Posted by Himeno
I have a new job for that TSO. Think he would like to be Australian Transport Minister? Sounds like he'd do a better job then the current one.

Why are they called "bad apples", why not something like "bad bananas"?
There's an old saying that goes something like "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel (of apples)".

All too true with TSA, and particularly ironic for an organization that tells us to "see something, say something". If I see a 'bad apple' TSO and other TSOs don't call him/her out, as far as I'm concerned, they are also 'bad apples' because they obviously approve of the misconduct.
chollie is online now  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 1:37 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 569
Originally Posted by Himeno
I have a new job for that TSO. Think he would like to be Australian Transport Minister? Sounds like he'd do a better job then the current one.

Why are they called "bad apples", why not something like "bad bananas"?
Apples used to be stored for winter... A bad apple could spoil the good ones.
Darkumbra is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 2:34 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 516
Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
One can be fired from the TSA by a single individual (called a boss).
One cannot be fired from the TSA by a single individual. The TSA employees are federal employees, and have the rights of federal employees. Termination is difficult.
OldGoat is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 5:45 am
  #22  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,597
Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
As much as it's hard for the bulk of the folks who frequent this forum to admit, there *are* actually some good apples in the TSA who care. Glad that this STSO appears to be one of them, and kudos to the OP for keeping a level head and properly addressing the issue.
There are indeed competent and professional TSOs and STSOs out there. The problem is, they are the exception rather than the norm.
halls120 is online now  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 7:50 am
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by halls120
There are indeed competent and professional TSOs and STSOs out there.
Statistically speaking, there has to be one somewhere.

The question is, "Where?"
Caradoc is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 9:13 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York and Vienna
Programs: PA WorldPass Platinum, AA, DL, LH. GHA Black, SPG and HHonors Gold
Posts: 3,870
Given the nature of the discussion here, some of you might want to voice your opinion in a FlyerTalk/Frequent Business Traveler survey on the effectiveness of the TSA.

Click here to take the survey if you wish.
jspira is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 11:33 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AA EXP, 2mm; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Caradoc
Statistically speaking, there has to be one somewhere.

The question is, "Where?"
The one from the OP seems to qualify in my book.
UshuaiaHammerfest is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 12:32 pm
  #26  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
The one from the OP seems to qualify in my book.
You mean the supervisor with an obvious problem on his team that he's failed to address?
Caradoc is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 12:49 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AA EXP, 2mm; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Caradoc
You mean the supervisor with an obvious problem on his team that he's failed to address?
Maybe I misread the post. From what I read, the supervisor addressed the problem the very second he became aware of it, while the problem was happening.

That's an example of a good manager.

Short of mind-reading, I'm not sure what would've allowed the supervisor to address the issue faster.
UshuaiaHammerfest is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 1:26 pm
  #28  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
From what I read, the supervisor addressed the problem the very second he became aware of it, while the problem was happening.
Do you honestly believe that such behavior would be a "first-time" issue?

If so, hey, you'd be a shoo-in for a TSA stuporvisor position.
Caradoc is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 1:42 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AA EXP, 2mm; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Caradoc
Do you honestly believe that such behavior would be a "first-time" issue?

If so, hey, you'd be a shoo-in for a TSA stuporvisor position.
My, what a rude and troll-y thing to say.

Anyway, since we have no idea if this was the TSO's first day (or the STSO, for that matter), or first time working with this particular supervisor, I stand by the fact that the supervisor strikes me as actually making an effort.

But hey, not everyone is capable of being objective. For those who'd rather just whine and complain, I suppose it's hard to admit that there are individuals within the TSA that are good examples to follow.
UshuaiaHammerfest is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 2:10 pm
  #30  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
Anyway, since we have no idea if this was the TSO's first day (or the STSO, for that matter), or first time working with this particular supervisor, I stand by the fact that the supervisor strikes me as actually making an effort.
If he's standing by himself, it's not his first day - unless all of the TSA employees have been lying about their first-day training and "shadowing" people at the checkpoint.

The employee in question was either improperly trained (supervisor failure) or had a bad attitude to start (another supervisor failure.)

Originally Posted by UshuaiaHammerfest
I suppose it's hard to admit that there are individuals within the TSA that are good examples to follow.
Given that their day starts with "Why, yes, I will put on a law enforcement costume and go violate people at the airport," I can't think of any reason anyone should follow any of their examples.
Caradoc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.