Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Spirit Airlines | Free Spirit
Reload this Page >

CHEAP is NOT always better - Rant about Spirit Air

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CHEAP is NOT always better - Rant about Spirit Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2013, 11:03 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8
Thanks for sharing and saving us the trouble of trying spirit airways. They sound like Ryanair and Air Europa.
2globalnomads is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2013, 4:49 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,958
Originally Posted by 2globalnomads
Thanks for sharing and saving us the trouble of trying spirit airways. They sound like Ryanair and Air Europa.
What's wrong with AirEuropa?
Palal is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2013, 6:20 pm
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Spirit is very upfront with its fees and the type of airline it runs. Never, ever would I consider Spirit for long haul or overnight flight. Other than the double charges the OP got what he paid for. No rant is justified.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2013, 12:23 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York
Programs: AA, WN, BA, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold, Club Carlson Gold, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 313
Give the OP some sympathy. Everyone who posted about the lack of research and preparation is completely correct. Spirit is an airline that not only thrives, but survives, on providing a specific type of service. They unbundle everything possible and throw out all industry standards. They have fees for having a agent print a boarding pass, basically anything that they can charge a fee for, they will.

Sometimes you need to fly Spirit to put into perspective how decent flying United/US/AA/Delta actually is. OP should call it a learning experience and move on. Anytime you fly a discount airline, research is key.
littlemookie is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2013, 9:58 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 3A - most likey <> BKK <--> EZE; TACA 3A nobody, but GP million miler; Hilton Gold sometimes. Successfully divorced from CO PLAT.
Posts: 3,079
Originally Posted by Palal
If you want a full-service carrier, pay more and fly one. If you don't want to pay for bags, don't pay.


And what is the name of that full service carrier you were thinking about?
tvl4free is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2013, 4:06 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8
AirEurope

Originally Posted by Palal
What's wrong with AirEuropa?
Had a really bad experience with AirEuropa back in 2007. They broke our backpack and it took over a year to get them pay the compensation they had promised.
2globalnomads is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2013, 5:17 pm
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Penny wise, pound foolish.

Originally Posted by Palal
What's wrong with AirEuropa?
As Spirit, UX nickle and dime everything. Even a cup of water you have to pay for.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2013, 7:31 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1
I live in MSP and have flown Spirit to ORD three times round trip. For a short trip, the petty inconveniences are worth it. In fact, I pretty much rave about Spirit airlines. At my urging a co-worker, her husband and two kids flew Spirit for a 5-day, 4-night trip to Chicago (they were going to drive). I talked to her, she did her homework and no complaints at all. Their RT cost (including one checked back each way) for all four of them was $199 (tickets purchased at the airport). For short flights and day trips, I don't think I will fly any other airline.
Becky55110 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2013, 5:58 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 60137
Posts: 10,498
Originally Posted by Becky55110
the petty inconveniences are worth it.
One short person's petty is a tall person's significant.

Bon Voyage and welcome to FT.
sonofzeus is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2013, 6:00 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 60137
Posts: 10,498
Originally Posted by littlemookie
Give the OP some sympathy.
FT isn't the place for goosh.

Thanks for playing.
sonofzeus is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2013, 5:06 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Programs: Frontier Gold, DL estranged 1MMer, Spirit VIP, CO/NW/UA/AA once gold/plat/comped gold now dust.
Posts: 38,151
Originally Posted by littlemookie
Give the OP some sympathy. Everyone who posted about the lack of research and preparation is completely correct. Spirit is an airline that not only thrives, but survives, on providing a specific type of service. They unbundle everything possible and throw out all industry standards. They have fees for having a agent print a boarding pass, basically anything that they can charge a fee for, they will.

Sometimes you need to fly Spirit to put into perspective how decent flying United/US/AA/Delta actually is. OP should call it a learning experience and move on. Anytime you fly a discount airline, research is key.
(bolding mine). I think the bolded sentence is key. How much research is reasonable to expect? You could do a total "caveat emptor" system and say that it's buyer-beware when it comes to safety (which is basically what happened with ValuJet), but we've decided - correctly - that that aspect should be out of bounds.

Spirit has basically been taking every possible advantage they can due to lack of regulation in other areas, and with no consideration whatsoever for the passenger experience. They'll basically provide the negative experience and reason that more regulations are needed, as they have already done when it comes to airfare advertising and quoted prices (they used to "hide" even mandatory fees before the DOT reined them in somewhat).

They're a great example of why deregulation and self-regulation just don't work...there will always be someone trying to take maximum advantage and then it'll be a race to the bottom as others see bad behavior rewarded. It's a proper and legitimate function of government to level the playing field and rule certain practices out-of-bounds if necessary, but with airlines in the old days there was reluctance to codify things that as long as airlines behaved voluntarily.

Part of Spirit's business model depends on X% of people assuming it'll be similar to other airlines and buying based on price. RyanAir is like that as well...many people find their total after all the fees is worse than the major carriers.

Some things are fair game for competition, but we also need industry standards. We'll get new things needing to be regulations rather than gentlemen's agreements because airlines like Spirit will show there's the need.

Last edited by RustyC; Jul 24, 2013 at 5:11 pm
RustyC is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2013, 8:34 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York
Programs: AA, WN, BA, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold, Club Carlson Gold, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 313
Originally Posted by RustyC
(bolding mine). I think the bolded sentence is key. How much research is reasonable to expect? You could do a total "caveat emptor" system and say that it's buyer-beware when it comes to safety (which is basically what happened with ValuJet), but we've decided - correctly - that that aspect should be out of bounds.

Spirit has basically been taking every possible advantage they can due to lack of regulation in other areas, and with no consideration whatsoever for the passenger experience. They'll basically provide the negative experience and reason that more regulations are needed, as they have already done when it comes to airfare advertising and quoted prices (they used to "hide" even mandatory fees before the DOT reined them in somewhat).

They're a great example of why deregulation and self-regulation just don't work...there will always be someone trying to take maximum advantage and then it'll be a race to the bottom as others see bad behavior rewarded. It's a proper and legitimate function of government to level the playing field and rule certain practices out-of-bounds if necessary, but with airlines in the old days there was reluctance to codify things that as long as airlines behaved voluntarily.

Part of Spirit's business model depends on X% of people assuming it'll be similar to other airlines and buying based on price. RyanAir is like that as well...many people find their total after all the fees is worse than the major carriers.

Some things are fair game for competition, but we also need industry standards. We'll get new things needing to be regulations rather than gentlemen's agreements because airlines like Spirit will show there's the need.
I don't really see industry standards happening anytime soon. For the first time in a very long time, airlines are finally making money. Not that long ago, airlines decided to charge to check a bag, make a seat assignment online, remove meal service, etc. and there was an outrage. At the end of the day when the outrage died down, those fees were here to stay and consumers adapted. Those fees enabled airlines to collect billions in fees for performing the same service they were previously providing and become profitable. You might say that the industry standard was lowered.

Spirit, Ryanair, and the others are taking that standard down to a whole new level. However, those airlines have a reputation for charging for everything and hopefully consumers are willing to understand that when you find those carriers you need to be extra cautious. I would say that anytime you fly an airline that is not one of the majors (speaking of US only at this point) you will need to take a look at their fee schedule.

I highly doubt you will ever see industry standards being set, as airlines have no incentive to do so and it will complicate matters when airlines attempt to try additional fees. The airline industry starts with a single airline that imposes a new fee and then a few weeks/months later, depending on the consumer backlash, the other airlines impose that same fee. It's a copycat industry that has enormous fixed costs and a huge unknown in fuel costs, unless they hedge their fuel costs significantly. IMHO, basic airfare to most major cities are down when compared to several years ago (I'm based in NYC which has very competitive pricing, but only fly to certain cities, so I may be dead wrong on this). There are many happy Spirit flyers, and Spirit fills a niche and does it well.
littlemookie is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2013, 3:28 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 802
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
Penny wise, pound foolish.



As Spirit, UX nickle and dime everything. Even a cup of water you have to pay for.
A "cup" of water?
I've flown about 30 legs on Spirit and they have always sold a whole bottle, not a cup,,,, unless something has changed very recently.
bigbuy is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2013, 2:00 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CHS
Programs: DL Diamond, WN A-List, Marriott Platinum Elite, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 685
Just flew Spirit the other day and found it to be...interesting. They got me from point A to B for a (relatively) low price but the aircraft was rather dirty.

Again, an interesting experience but nothing terribly wrong with it when the price is right.

TR Posted on FlyerTalk here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trip-...6-myr-bos.html

Check out full post with pictures here:Weekend Blitz - SPIRIT AIRLINES REVIEW – NK #126 MYRTLE BEACH-BOSTON


Looking a little grimy on the floor


Oh, you want to bring stuff with you on this flight? That'll be $100.
jmgriffin is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2013, 2:45 pm
  #30  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,429
Originally Posted by jmgriffin
Oh, you want to bring stuff with you on this flight? That'll be $100.
Only if you are uninformed

You can prepay for "checked carryon" that exceeds Spirit Air's less than industry standard for much, much less than that @:-)

But thanks, nice job on the report ^

Oh, and given the type of clientele Spirit is after, I'm not surprised their a/c get dirty in a hurry, even on their rather new fleet

EmailKid
EmailKid is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.