No BP Check on boarding at LGW/LHR [short haul trial]
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Programs: BA Gold, IC Ambassador, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Fairmont Platinum
Posts: 3,166
No BP Check on boarding at LGW/LHR [short haul trial]
Not seen this posted before, but on boarding a LGW-JER flight yesterday, I was told that the cabin crew no longer need to see your BP at the door on boarding. Apparently there is a one month trial at LGW.
It was not clear what routes this applies to just JER or DOM or all Euro flights.
As I was seated in row 1, watched what happened and yep the crew didn't look at BPs unless they were thrust in front of them. I was surprised that no survey forms were handed out, but (a) LGW-JER is so short, they probably won't be time to get them back; and (b) I am not sure whether the passenger is supposed to be aware of or even notice this change.
From my perspective, I really can't see there being much to benefit from this. On most flights I take a cursory glance at a BP is not the bottle neck that slows smooth boarding. It is more likely to be people trying to force ridiculously over-sized hand luggage into the overheads and thereby blocking the aisle.
The lack of a BP check will also mean that elites are not greeted by name (something that may matter to DYKWIA types - I find it a nice touch) and the crew will not automatically indicate to passengers who may be unfamiliar with the plane/airline/seat numbering system that "your seat is half way down on the left".
Presumably the gate check will avoid any (or many) "I thought I was going to BCN, but ended up in RAK" incidents. Although surely one extra check can't be a bad thing. I am sure I am not alone in having seen people turned back at the door as they were not supposed to be on that flight.
Anyway, here we go, another (currently being trialed) enhancement
It was not clear what routes this applies to just JER or DOM or all Euro flights.
As I was seated in row 1, watched what happened and yep the crew didn't look at BPs unless they were thrust in front of them. I was surprised that no survey forms were handed out, but (a) LGW-JER is so short, they probably won't be time to get them back; and (b) I am not sure whether the passenger is supposed to be aware of or even notice this change.
From my perspective, I really can't see there being much to benefit from this. On most flights I take a cursory glance at a BP is not the bottle neck that slows smooth boarding. It is more likely to be people trying to force ridiculously over-sized hand luggage into the overheads and thereby blocking the aisle.
The lack of a BP check will also mean that elites are not greeted by name (something that may matter to DYKWIA types - I find it a nice touch) and the crew will not automatically indicate to passengers who may be unfamiliar with the plane/airline/seat numbering system that "your seat is half way down on the left".
Presumably the gate check will avoid any (or many) "I thought I was going to BCN, but ended up in RAK" incidents. Although surely one extra check can't be a bad thing. I am sure I am not alone in having seen people turned back at the door as they were not supposed to be on that flight.
Anyway, here we go, another (currently being trialed) enhancement
Last edited by Prospero; Jan 8, 2014 at 4:03 pm Reason: Add title suffix
#2
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: glasgow
Programs: ba lifetime gold, MAS gold, hhonors gold
Posts: 723
started on Monday - applies to domestics at LHR and GLA as well - appears to speed up boarding a bit. Don't see how anyone without a valid boarding card could get through the boarding gate check so should be a real enhancement
#3
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SIN 5 days out of 7
Programs: BD*G, A3*G, BA-S, Accor Gold, IHG Amb
Posts: 5,505
Presumably the gate check will avoid any (or many) "I thought I was going to BCN, but ended up in RAK" incidents. Although surely one extra check can't be a bad thing. I am sure I am not alone in having seen people turned back at the door as they were not supposed to be on that flight.
#5
Join Date: Oct 2013
Programs: BA GGL/CCR
Posts: 370
This is excellent news. Maybe it will free up flight attendants to finally start offering a proper CE PDB service.
There is nothing less premium than being on a band 1 CE flight where you sit on the aircraft for a solid hour between boarding and being served a drink in the air after they do the food service, (never understand why they serve food before drinks in the air, either.)
I've lately started carrying a bottle of something on all CE flights so I can stay hydrated.
There is nothing less premium than being on a band 1 CE flight where you sit on the aircraft for a solid hour between boarding and being served a drink in the air after they do the food service, (never understand why they serve food before drinks in the air, either.)
I've lately started carrying a bottle of something on all CE flights so I can stay hydrated.
#7
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: glasgow
Programs: ba lifetime gold, MAS gold, hhonors gold
Posts: 723
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Programs: BA Gold, IC Ambassador, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Fairmont Platinum
Posts: 3,166
#9
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: usually LON
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Tesco Blue, TK Elite (*G), Oyster Diamond Jubilee edition
Posts: 1,546
From my perspective, I really can't see there being much to benefit from this. On most flights I take a cursory glance at a BP is not the bottle neck that slows smooth boarding. It is more likely to be people trying to force ridiculously over-sized hand luggage into the overheads and thereby blocking the aisle.
The lack of a BP check will also mean that elites are not greeted by name (something that may matter to DYKWIA types - I find it a nice touch) ...
... and the crew will not automatically indicate to passengers who may be unfamiliar with the plane/airline/seat numbering system that "your seat is half way down on the left".
Presumably the gate check will avoid any (or many) "I thought I was going to BCN, but ended up in RAK" incidents. Although surely one extra check can't be a bad thing. I am sure I am not alone in having seen people turned back at the door as they were not supposed to be on that flight.
Anyway, here we go, another (currently being trialed) enhancement
Anyway, here we go, another (currently being trialed) enhancement
If LH can be doing it for years, I am pretty sure BA can do it too.
#11
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edinburgh
Programs: BA Gold, Accor Silver, Flying Blue Zilch, East Coast Rewards Lots&lots, Miles & More nada
Posts: 288
#12
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: EDI
Programs: BA Silver; BA Amex PP; Accor Plat
Posts: 361
I think it's a good idea. Surely the majority of cases (if there are even enough to be a majority) of boarding the wrong plane would be caught by seat duplications. Most flights I'm on do tend to be pretty full so seat 12C to BCN, and on-the-wrong-plane seat 12C to MAD would soon meet. Even if it was a deliberate attempt to board the wrong plane that somehow got past the gate, you'd still have to pick a seat to pretend to be yours, so chances are high the rightful incumbent would speak up.
Seems a quick win to me.
Seems a quick win to me.
#14
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,669
So would this be impimented on flights ex-T3 at LHR I wonder? If you look at the gate 24 departures for say PRG and VIE within 15 minutes of each other, sometimes they board simultaneously. It would not be too difficult (either deliberately or by accident) to get on the wrong bus as they both pull up behind each other at gate 24. Only way you would trap this is at the aircraft door still.
Would be easy for someone doing it deliberately to get on the last (wrong) bus and hang back to be last to board the aircraft and then just pick a spare seat.