Australian man "crushed" in economy seat 14 hours sues AA for injuries
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
One question I have is does he have proof of the size of the passenger next to him and the amount of intrusion?
(As I read this, they can intrude into your space 1 inch on the side of the armrest where you are, I think that is an inch and 1/2 an armrest too much.)
Customers that need extra space
For the safety and comfort of all customers, if a customer’s body extends more than 1 inch beyond the outermost edge of the armrest and a seat belt extension is needed, another seat is required. We encourage customers to address all seating needs when booking.
When you call to book, Reservations will make sure you get 2 adjacent seats at the same rate.
If you didn’t book an extra seat in advance, ask an airport agent to find out if 2 adjacent seats are available.
You may be offered a seat in a higher class of service that may provide more space; in this case, you’ll be responsible for the fare difference.
If accommodations can’t be made on your original flight, you can buy seats on a different flight at the same price as your original seats.
https://www.aa.com/i18n/travel-info/...jsp#extraspace
#47
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lax
Posts: 3,888
#48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LHR / BHX / MAN / ATL
Programs: DL DM 2MM - IHG Diamond
Posts: 4,053
There already ARE bigger seats. They are located at the front of the plane. That's not making any sort of judgement about a POS or any other passenger. The reality is that what airlines are selling is real estate - you want (or need) more, you pay more.
#50
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,085
This thread is about a lawsuit, yet it very immediately spiraled into a conversation about how to successfully shame obese people into not flying. Some of the suggestions in this thread are shameful. Pre-conceived notions about obese people and plans to treat them differently than other passengers are offensive, and I don't think they belong here.
There are definitely sensitive, respectful, reasonable, and ethical ways to solve this issue going forward.
#51
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CLL
Programs: MS Plat, AOR ninja
Posts: 2,177
A while back i was traveling LAS - IAH and there was a POS -- probably 400 lbs, I'm not exaggerating -- who was seated in the aisle and was quite literally in HALF the seat next to him. And the gal in the middle seat was pushed half into the window seat. Not sure what ever happened to the window seat pax, as I couldn't see clearly from where I was seated.
When walking down the aisle past the POS, everybody had to turn sideways because his upper body was maybe 12" into the aisle. I felt really sad for the gal next to him. She had a very miserable look on her face when I walked past.
It's one thing to be a bit plump and have none of your seat to share with others. It's another thing entirely to take up another person's seat.
Note: This is not a fat-shaming comment, rather a discussion that if you truly TRULY require 30+ inches of seat width, you need to make accommodations to ensure you have your needs met without seriously encroaching on another pax's space.
When walking down the aisle past the POS, everybody had to turn sideways because his upper body was maybe 12" into the aisle. I felt really sad for the gal next to him. She had a very miserable look on her face when I walked past.
It's one thing to be a bit plump and have none of your seat to share with others. It's another thing entirely to take up another person's seat.
Note: This is not a fat-shaming comment, rather a discussion that if you truly TRULY require 30+ inches of seat width, you need to make accommodations to ensure you have your needs met without seriously encroaching on another pax's space.
#52
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
The problem isn't as easily solved as many of the "just buy two seats or a first class ticket" crowd seem to think it is. Only Southwest actually makes it easy to actually book two seats.
#53
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,085
I probably wasn't as clear as I could have been. My point was that the responsibility for the solution rests both with the customer AND with the company. The customer needs to be willing to address their needs upfront and in advance, while AA needs to have the processes and policies in place to make it possible for passengers to do so.
#55
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eurozone
Programs: LH SEN, HH Gold
Posts: 3,002
This thread is about a lawsuit, yet it very immediately spiraled into a conversation about how to successfully shame obese people into not flying. Some of the suggestions in this thread are shameful. Pre-conceived notions about obese people and plans to treat them differently than other passengers are offensive, and I don't think they belong here.
#56
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FNT, but DTW if I can't help it
Programs: AAdvantage Former EXP/Current PLT / Total Rewards - Diamond / Hilton HHonors - Gold
Posts: 757
If others' opinions on the broad subject (as I see it: Australian man "crushed" in economy seat 14 hours, lawsuit filed, implications for others down the road?) aren't welcome, I'd simply call for a thread lock and see how that goes rather than judge others for potentially judging others.
I have no problem with the subject matter of the thread or the discussion of what happened/should have happened (Calling for a thread lock and "seeing what happens" would be the wrong approach), but the implication of treating people like carry-on luggage and requiring them to "comfortably fit within the sizer" or "excuse me, sir, can you go behind the fat curtain for a second?" struck me as asinine, offensive, and dehumanizing. While singling out and parading people of size in front of a crowd of people waiting to board an airplane because of their size might sound acceptable to people who do dehumanize large people, I wouldn't fly on an airline that implemented this practice.
AA should enforce their existing policy regarding people of size properly. If this indeed happened the way the man described, it's a customer service failure on AA's part. They have a policy which would have allowed them to handle this tactfully, and they dropped the ball.
#57
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 5,735
I am a big guy but the arm rest can go all the way down and I have not needed a seat belt extension (yet.... time to hit the gym).
But I am big in the shoulders too.
And the seats are awfully small.
I feel for all involved.
But I am big in the shoulders too.
And the seats are awfully small.
I feel for all involved.
#58
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 350
This thread is about a lawsuit, yet it very immediately spiraled into a conversation about how to successfully shame obese people into not flying. Some of the suggestions in this thread are shameful. Pre-conceived notions about obese people and plans to treat them differently than other passengers are offensive, and I don't think they belong here.
Why can an airline charge bags by size and weight but not people? If you take up more space, you add to cost. If you take up more weight, you add to fuel.
#59
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 5,270
#60
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lax
Posts: 3,888
Wrong.
I have no problem with the subject matter of the thread or the discussion of what happened/should have happened (Calling for a thread lock and "seeing what happens" would be the wrong approach), but the implication of treating people like carry-on luggage and requiring them to "comfortably fit within the sizer" or "excuse me, sir, can you go behind the fat curtain for a second?" struck me as asinine, offensive, and dehumanizing. While singling out and parading people of size in front of a crowd of people waiting to board an airplane because of their size might sound acceptable to people who do dehumanize large people, I wouldn't fly on an airline that implemented this practice.
AA should enforce their existing policy regarding people of size properly. If this indeed happened the way the man described, it's a customer service failure on AA's part. They have a policy which would have allowed them to handle this tactfully, and they dropped the ball.
I have no problem with the subject matter of the thread or the discussion of what happened/should have happened (Calling for a thread lock and "seeing what happens" would be the wrong approach), but the implication of treating people like carry-on luggage and requiring them to "comfortably fit within the sizer" or "excuse me, sir, can you go behind the fat curtain for a second?" struck me as asinine, offensive, and dehumanizing. While singling out and parading people of size in front of a crowd of people waiting to board an airplane because of their size might sound acceptable to people who do dehumanize large people, I wouldn't fly on an airline that implemented this practice.
AA should enforce their existing policy regarding people of size properly. If this indeed happened the way the man described, it's a customer service failure on AA's part. They have a policy which would have allowed them to handle this tactfully, and they dropped the ball.