USAirways Merger Rumors Resurfacing...
#136
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York
Programs: AA EXP 1.0mm, not sure where I am with hotels these days
Posts: 2,795
JFK Terminals
AA has invested over $1bn into new Terminal 8 at JFK which is an excellent terminal. Terminal 8 is isolated and cannot be easily connected to other terminals. There is the possibility that Iberia and BA may come over to 8 from the terminal shared with United, USAirways, et al to join AirBerlin and Finnair. Terminal has the ability to expand to the location where Terminal 9 used to be.
JetBlue has invested a similar amount in the old TWA terminal (Terminal 5 I think). Excellent terminal as well although the parking lot access is a huge limitation. Not sure of capacity expansion.
Delta's Terminal 2 and 3 are jjust awful and they are negotiating with the PA to build their own $1bn terminal.
The International Arrivals terminal (Terminal 4) is between Delta and jetBlue.
Logistically, I don't know how you consolidate jetBlue and AA in that airport. USAirways is not a player at JFK but you could put them anywhere. Not sure if you can move Delta to either jetBlue or AA terminal via a sale of the terminal rights.
JetBlue has invested a similar amount in the old TWA terminal (Terminal 5 I think). Excellent terminal as well although the parking lot access is a huge limitation. Not sure of capacity expansion.
Delta's Terminal 2 and 3 are jjust awful and they are negotiating with the PA to build their own $1bn terminal.
The International Arrivals terminal (Terminal 4) is between Delta and jetBlue.
Logistically, I don't know how you consolidate jetBlue and AA in that airport. USAirways is not a player at JFK but you could put them anywhere. Not sure if you can move Delta to either jetBlue or AA terminal via a sale of the terminal rights.
#137
Moderator: American AAdvantage, Signatures
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, National Exec, AA EXP Emeritus
Posts: 9,765
Delta are spending a sizable sum to update their existing JFK terminals, with construction already well underway. I don't see them moving anywhere in the short to medium term.
#138
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 7,710
The reason AA's terminal is being underutilized is a lack of slots. Since US doesn't have slots and AA needs more, there is almost no chance US will be brought to JFK unless they merge with someone other than AA, B6 being the most likely candidate. Though a US-B6 merger is more likely than an AA-US merger, it still seems like a long shot.
In the event of an AA B6 merger the terminals would likely remain separate, but that is a great connection compared to JFK-LGA, which is currently AA's only option for additional "connecting" flights.
What would B6 be called after the merger? Maybe American Blue with a blue scissor eagle?
I also suspect the combined entity would end up with a hub at BOS, where AA's current operations in B and E are connected by B6's operations in C.
In the event of an AA B6 merger the terminals would likely remain separate, but that is a great connection compared to JFK-LGA, which is currently AA's only option for additional "connecting" flights.
What would B6 be called after the merger? Maybe American Blue with a blue scissor eagle?
I also suspect the combined entity would end up with a hub at BOS, where AA's current operations in B and E are connected by B6's operations in C.
#139
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Again, no way Jose I see an AA/B6 merger although a full code share arrangement eventually IMHO is likely. T8 is indeed a very nice terminal but the B6 T5 really rules the day (sans an AC or lounge of course). The place does not even feel like an airport.
In the event of a code share I could see a shuttle bus service used between the two terminals.
In the event of a code share I could see a shuttle bus service used between the two terminals.
#140
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
AA has invested over $1bn into new Terminal 8 at JFK which is an excellent terminal. Terminal 8 is isolated and cannot be easily connected to other terminals. There is the possibility that Iberia and BA may come over to 8 from the terminal shared with United, USAirways, et al to join AirBerlin and Finnair. Terminal has the ability to expand to the location where Terminal 9 used to be.
The reason AA's terminal is being underutilized is a lack of slots. Since US doesn't have slots and AA needs more, there is almost no chance US will be brought to JFK unless they merge with someone other than AA, B6 being the most likely candidate. Though a US-B6 merger is more likely than an AA-US merger, it still seems like a long shot.
In the event of an AA B6 merger the terminals would likely remain separate, but that is a great connection compared to JFK-LGA, which is currently AA's only option for additional "connecting" flights.
In the event of an AA B6 merger the terminals would likely remain separate, but that is a great connection compared to JFK-LGA, which is currently AA's only option for additional "connecting" flights.
Again, no way Jose I see an AA/B6 merger although a full code share arrangement eventually IMHO is likely. T8 is indeed a very nice terminal but the B6 T5 really rules the day (sans an AC or lounge of course). The place does not even feel like an airport.
In the event of a code share I could see a shuttle bus service used between the two terminals.
In the event of a code share I could see a shuttle bus service used between the two terminals.
#141
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BNA and TPA
Programs: AA-EXP, UA, WN, DL- zilch by choice, IHG-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, Hilton Gold,
Posts: 566
There's another girl out there who wants to get married very badly (US). But seriously ... different aircraft types, worse union relations than AA by far, an international hub in the same region as JFK, low cost O&D markets, and a route structure that just doesn't do much for AA apart from the Southeast that AA could deal with through RDU if it wanted.
#142
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Charlotte is a nice city, but it's the 33rd largest metro area in the country and its domestic O&D doesn't break the top 25 in the USA, IIRC. It's a very low-O&D hub with somewhat low-fare connecting traffic. While it works for LCC, I don't see a place for it at AA if US and AA are combined.
Last edited by FWAAA; Oct 21, 2011 at 2:42 pm
#143
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,528
Charlotte is a nice city, but it's the 33rd largest metro area in the country and its domestic O&D doesn't break the top 25 in the USA, IIRC. It's a very low-O&D hub with somewhat low-fare connecting traffic. While it works for LCC, I don't see a place for it at AA if US and AA are combined.
I'll take DFW any day of the week.
#144
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: los angeles, calif.
Programs: Alaska Airlines Gold MVP
Posts: 7,170
Contrary to popular belief, slots are not scarce at JFK. They are actually plentiful as long as its not during peak periods, roughly 3p-8p. Given the weak long-haul market, AA is sitting on a lot of peak slots and using the on domestic flights. When market conditions improve, and AA's condition improves, AA will be able to utilize these slots for long-haul services, while expanding domestic flying acquiring slots available outside the slot scarce times.
#145
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: somewhere
Programs: their are many of them
Posts: 1,614
I just don't see this merger being a viable option. US is all about east coast operations. American has been clear through recent actions that it has no interest in hubs at any location Aside from : ORD, DFW, JFK, MIA, and LAX.
Here is how the merger would play out. AA would acqurie hubs at PHX, CLT, and PHL. and the DCA mini hub.
the fleets don't mesh Usairways is Mainly an Airbus fleet. except the 757s and the 737s . Though unless the engines are the same AA has zero interest in the same type of aircraft.
PHX would disppear as a hub AA would cite it is an overlap with LAX.
PHL maybe would stay as a relief hub for jfk but yet again overlap with New York Airports.
CLT sure but AA doesn't want to be in the NC market the actions at RDU demonstrate that. CLT would give AA dominent EAST COAST COVERAGE and reinforce the carribean route network.
I remember when SJU was a major hub........ can anyone say ghost town??
I just don't see this happening
Here is how the merger would play out. AA would acqurie hubs at PHX, CLT, and PHL. and the DCA mini hub.
the fleets don't mesh Usairways is Mainly an Airbus fleet. except the 757s and the 737s . Though unless the engines are the same AA has zero interest in the same type of aircraft.
PHX would disppear as a hub AA would cite it is an overlap with LAX.
PHL maybe would stay as a relief hub for jfk but yet again overlap with New York Airports.
CLT sure but AA doesn't want to be in the NC market the actions at RDU demonstrate that. CLT would give AA dominent EAST COAST COVERAGE and reinforce the carribean route network.
I remember when SJU was a major hub........ can anyone say ghost town??
I just don't see this happening
#146
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
OMG yes! I was at SJU a couple of weekends ago, and I walked the entire length of the terminal airside. It was quite creepy to walk down the hallway of gates 1-9.....absolutely nobody there, shops boarded up, dusty broken equipment everywhere, etc.
#147
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SFO/OAK/SJC
Programs: AA LT PLT, 2.15 million miles; Priority Club PLT
Posts: 987
Not to mention huge CLT employer BofA is slowly going down the tubes and eventually should be broken-up/dismantled; that will be a huge blow to CLT down the road.
#148
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BNA and TPA
Programs: AA-EXP, UA, WN, DL- zilch by choice, IHG-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, Hilton Gold,
Posts: 566
Charlotte is a nice city, but it's the 33rd largest metro area in the country and its domestic O&D doesn't break the top 25 in the USA, IIRC. It's a very low-O&D hub with somewhat low-fare connecting traffic. While it works for LCC, I don't see a place for it at AA if US and AA are combined.
Charlotte is one of the smallest metro areas among the mega hubs. While many hubs have service that the local O&D market couldn't support, CLT seems especially out of proportion and at risk.
#149
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: eastern Europe & NC
Posts: 4,527
Yeah, but if crappy JFK is the alternative for a connection, I would take Charlotte any day. I fly largely TATL, and JFK is my number one ''avoid if at all possible'' airport on your side of the pond, followed by Dulles.