Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > American Airlines | AAdvantage (Pre-Consolidation with USAir)
Reload this Page >

Pls Advise: Wrongfully Denied Boarding for "Seeming Intoxicated" While on AA DEQM MR

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Pls Advise: Wrongfully Denied Boarding for "Seeming Intoxicated" While on AA DEQM MR

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2012, 2:40 pm
  #121  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AA SPG Amex
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by Radiant Flyer
It came to the point where the Gate Agent called Security to escort him out of the terminal, why would this event go to this level unless he was showing some sort of impairment from alcohol.... or some other erratic behavior.

I doubt any jury is going to take that he was just exhausted... there is more to this story.
Perhaps one of our resident medical/science experts can weigh in, but I always thought that behaviors and mannerisms resulting from intoxication were due in no small part to dehydration which, can also result from a full day of back-to-back flights.
Upgraded! is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 3:38 pm
  #122  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
OP:

How many minutes prior to scheduled departure time did you approach the GA asking for your seat?

Were you rebooked for a next-day flight when they cancelled you?
hillrider is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 3:45 pm
  #123  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,916
I recall a CO incident at Orange County Airport where I think the OP was removed on the ground when the FA determined him to be intoxicated. I can't find it searching but I recollect he was determined to not have been under the influence by the ground staff, however, the FO wouldn't allow him to re-board and he was booked on the next flight.
elitetraveler is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 3:49 pm
  #124  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: 6E Westbound, 4E Eastbound
Programs: AA EXP & 3MM, Priority Club Plat since 1984
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by sbrower
This thread has been interesting, partly because I don't remember seeing any others on the exact same topic. Does anyone else remember a thread on FT related to denial of boarding for "apparent intoxication"? (Threads on FA's discontinuing beverage service don't count, I am only referring to GA denial of boarding.)

Only once, when it was the pilot. (sigh)
Thumper is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 5:20 pm
  #125  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold but PlatPro thanks to LPs
Posts: 4,439
Originally Posted by janetdoe

"Bummer"? Really? how on earth would that be the correct/ logical/ reasonable response to being denied boarding for intoxication, when you knew you had not been drinking?
There is a huge gap in the OP's account between the time he was told that the standby list had closed and the GA calling Security. He says he spend "several minutes" "reasoning" with the GA, but does not detail what he said and how he said it.

I cannot imagine any GA calling security if all the passenger said was "Bummer, I was asleep and did not hear my name.".


1. Unnecessary detail does not equate to overly dramatic. In fact, the OP's (admittedly verbose) but calm presentation of the facts seem to support his claim that he handled the situation in a calm, low key fashion, and that he seems pretty levelheaded.
Several minutes is way to long to be debating with a gate agent. He missed the standby flight, by his own fault. Period. What was there more to talk about?

2. Your previously expressed views and complete disdain for and/or total incomprehension of alcohol consumption, make any of your views about the appearance of 'intoxication' versus exhaustion completely unpersuasive to me.
True, I don't like alcohol, nor do I like missing flights. Guilty as charged.

I have absolutely zero problem with other people drinking alcohol, so long as they don't crash their car into me. I do not accept "I needed to finish my drink" as an excuse for missing an important life activity, such as catching a plane.


3. Your previously expressed views about how you are always at the gate two hours before departure, and see this behavior as logical and reasonable, and expect similar behavior from other passengers, makes me laugh at your equation of 'OP missing his name being called' = 'apparent disinterest in flying'.
I am not "always" at the gate two hours before departure. Living in north Los Angeles County, with the undependable 405 traffic between my house and LAX dictates that I allow plenty of time. I aim to arrive at the airport about 90 minutes before departure, leaving me time to get through TSA and usually find myself at the gate about an hour before departure. That works for me, and I have yet to miss a flight in my life.

Some of us live in a world where we prefer to arrive at the gate 20 minutes or so before takeoff, especially if we were finishing up a drink in the AC. That certainly doesn't mean we have no interest in flying.
Sure, that's fine, no problem with me, great, but if you miss a flight don't blame anyone but yourself.
QueenOfCoach is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 5:26 pm
  #126  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by Upgraded!
Perhaps one of our resident medical/science experts can weigh in, but I always thought that behaviors and mannerisms resulting from intoxication were due in no small part to dehydration which, can also result from a full day of back-to-back flights.
Especially if you don't order much to drink.
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 5:26 pm
  #127  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bay Area
Programs: WN A-List, AA good-riddance, Safeway Club Card Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,851
Originally Posted by QueenOfCoach
Several minutes is way to long to be debating with a gate agent. He missed the standby flight, by his own fault. Period. What was there more to talk about?
You're ignoring the the elephant in the room: namely, that the OP was denied boarding on his originally-ticketed flight. If you miss your standby call (through sleep or absence), it's reasonable for them to give your seat to the next available person. To take it a step further and say "sorry, you're not getting on a plane at all today" goes well beyond the pale (absent some seriously erratic or aggressive behavior on the part of the passenger).
Science Goy is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 5:42 pm
  #128  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
Intoxicated or not, when you miss the call for the standby seat and the agent gives it away, there is nothing further to discuss with the gate agent, who is trying to get the flight out.
mvoight is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 5:54 pm
  #129  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by mvoight
Intoxicated or not, when you miss the call for the standby seat and the agent gives it away, there is nothing further to discuss with the gate agent, who is trying to get the flight out.
The GA took him off his later flight; that astonishing action would certainly have given them something to discuss. So many people in this thread seem to be ignoring the fact that she did this.

I'm amazed that the OP remained so calm about it.
Moineau is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 6:33 pm
  #130  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,916
Originally Posted by Moineau
The GA took him off his later flight; that astonishing action would certainly have given them something to discuss. So many people in this thread seem to be ignoring the fact that she did this.
They ignore the facts presented by OP as they want to blame OP and teach him a lesson via recurring lectures. Even if it was later proven that the GA was ORD's version of Helen, they would still lecture OP he could have avoided Helen by not ordering the OJ

Unfortunately their prosecutorial tones continue to ensure folks who could contribute positive advice stay away.
elitetraveler is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 6:35 pm
  #131  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AA SPG Amex
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by QueenOfCoach
There is a huge gap in the OP's account between the time he was told that the standby list had closed and the GA calling Security. He says he spend "several minutes" "reasoning" with the GA, but does not detail what he said and how he said it.

I cannot imagine any GA calling security if all the passenger said was "Bummer, I was asleep and did not hear my name.".



Several minutes is way to long to be debating with a gate agent. He missed the standby flight, by his own fault. Period. What was there more to talk about?



True, I don't like alcohol, nor do I like missing flights. Guilty as charged.

I have absolutely zero problem with other people drinking alcohol, so long as they don't crash their car into me. I do not accept "I needed to finish my drink" as an excuse for missing an important life activity, such as catching a plane.



<snip>



Sure, that's fine, no problem with me, great, but if you miss a flight don't blame anyone but yourself.
A debate would ensue if the OP protested the GA taking him off of his original flight, I can tell you that much, and this GA sounds like she was on a power trip from the beginning. And once again, it doesn't sound like you actually fly that much, or have ever done a mileage run, but after nearly 24hrs on planes I don't think "oh, bummer" without even trying to reason their way onto the flight is a likely reaction from anyone in the OP's position. And he didn't "miss" his standby flight, it was still at the gate and boarding. According to the GA he missed his call for the flight and his seat was given away, but he didn't actually miss the flight.

I also have to say that your view on alcohol is also fairly myopic: there are plenty of people out there who consume alcohol and find ways to destroy others' lives without ever crashing a car, let alone into you. And NOWHERE did anyone ever talk about missing a flight to finish a drink; I don't know why you felt the need to throw that in there.

Finally, your unsympathetic closing line once again completely ignores the fact that the OP was offloaded from a flight 90 minutes out. He didn't miss his flight. He missed standby for an earlier flight.
Upgraded! is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 6:38 pm
  #132  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by Moineau
The GA took him off his later flight; that astonishing action would certainly have given them something to discuss. So many people in this thread seem to be ignoring the fact that she did this.

I'm amazed that the OP remained so calm about it.
Pretty standard. Once you're denied boarding, you're not flying again until the next day. The GA may well have told OP it was because he "didn't appear interested" as a means of defusing the situation before Chicago PD arrived, but the fact remains that it's unlikely that once the GA made the determination as to flight #1, that was it for the day.
Often1 is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 6:47 pm
  #133  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AA SPG Amex
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by Often1
Pretty standard. Once you're denied boarding, you're not flying again until the next day. The GA may well have told OP it was because he "didn't appear interested" as a means of defusing the situation before Chicago PD arrived, but the fact remains that it's unlikely that once the GA made the determination as to flight #1, that was it for the day.
In this case it wouldn't have mattered anyhow; the 9:05pm is the last ORD-LAX of the day.
Upgraded! is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 7:16 pm
  #134  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: I 35 south bound, finally stopped
Programs: LT Plt, 4mm, *A GLD, burned out medical provider, executing our estate plan
Posts: 1,665
Originally Posted by Upgraded!
Perhaps one of our resident medical/science experts can weigh in, but I always thought that behaviors and mannerisms resulting from intoxication were due in no small part to dehydration which, can also result from a full day of back-to-back flights.
yes, and you can be dehydrated/volume depleted by flying without touching any Etoh as we all know. Sleep deprivation is why doctors in training can no longer work more than 80 hours a week. And dehydration + sleep deprivation can be really bad.

http://www.statefundca.com/safety/sa...?ArticleID=116

Intoxication- To cause stupefaction, stimulation, or excitement by or as if by use of a chemical substance:

see microsleeps in this link, sounds like OP may have had one of those

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_deprivation
boerne is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2012, 7:39 pm
  #135  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AA SPG Amex
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by boerne
yes, and you can be dehydrated/volume depleted by flying without touching any Etoh as we all know. Sleep deprivation is why doctors in training can no longer work more than 80 hours a week. And dehydration + sleep deprivation can be really bad.

http://www.statefundca.com/safety/sa...?ArticleID=116

Intoxication- To cause stupefaction, stimulation, or excitement by or as if by use of a chemical substance:

see microsleeps in this link, sounds like OP may have had one of those

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_deprivation
Given the kinds of travel road warriors today subject themselves to, this really is something GAs should be more well informed about, don't you think?
Upgraded! is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.