Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AS adds more PDX-HNL flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2015, 9:33 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FUK/Fukuoka
Programs: AS, HA, JL, UA
Posts: 676
AS adds more PDX-HNL flights

PDX-HNL suddenly going 9x/week from June 2015. This comes on the heels of DL announcing they are resuming PDX-HNL. Coincidence or is AS fighting back?
Tanaka07 is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2015, 11:27 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,342
Originally Posted by jjka
PDX-HNL suddenly going 9x/week from June 2015. This comes on the heels of DL announcing they are resuming PDX-HNL. Coincidence or is AS fighting back?
AS is a winner!!! They will fought it off!! Go get'em!!
N830MH is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 12:04 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Hilton Contributor BadgeIHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,957
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's BB: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)

Originally Posted by N830MH
Originally Posted by jjka
PDX-HNL suddenly going 9x/week from June 2015. This comes on the heels of DL announcing they are resuming PDX-HNL. Coincidence or is AS fighting back?
AS is a winner!!! They will fought it off!! Go get'em!!
Pre-emptive strike against DL and HA?

When does HA get the airbii in?
beckoa is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 6:56 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by jjka
PDX-HNL suddenly going 9x/week from June 2015. This comes on the heels of DL announcing they are resuming PDX-HNL. Coincidence or is AS fighting back?
I was not aware that Delta was restarting PDX-HNL. That's good for the consumer in the short term. In the long term we'll see. I am sure that this is more damage for Hawaiian Airlines than anyone else.
WebTraveler is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 7:43 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: HNL
Programs: AS MVPG, HA Plat
Posts: 1,268
Originally Posted by beckoa
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's BB: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)



Pre-emptive strike against DL and HA?

When does HA get the airbii in?
HA's A321neos are supposed to start arriving in 2017, but they have an A330 on PDX-HNL now.
WrightHI is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 8:05 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,830
Originally Posted by jjka
PDX-HNL suddenly going 9x/week from June 2015. This comes on the heels of DL announcing they are resuming PDX-HNL. Coincidence or is AS fighting back?
Shifted equipment from BLI-LAS/HNL
CZBB is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 8:12 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,342
Originally Posted by WrightHI
HA's A321neos are supposed to start arriving in 2017, but they have an A330 on PDX-HNL now.
Yes, they will received the first A321neos delivery sometime in 2017. Right now, they haven't starting assembly.
N830MH is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 10:02 am
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FUK/Fukuoka
Programs: AS, HA, JL, UA
Posts: 676
Originally Posted by WrightHI
HA's A321neos are supposed to start arriving in 2017, but they have an A330 on PDX-HNL now.
Expect HA to resume PDX-OGG once these new aircraft arrive. Maybe even PDX-LIH/KOA as well.
Tanaka07 is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 10:09 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SEA, NW/DL 1.6Million Miler
Programs: DL 1MM Annual Silver,AS 100K 22-24, AS 75K 15-21
Posts: 4,288
Originally Posted by CZBB
Shifted equipment from BLI-LAS/HNL
Hawaii isn't in "high season" during summer when rest of US is also experiencing warmer weather. Additional deployment to the island is not necesasarily the best solution for summer on AS bottom line.

jiburi
jiburi is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 11:26 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
Originally Posted by jiburi
Hawaii isn't in "high season" during summer when rest of US is also experiencing warmer weather. Additional deployment to the island is not necesasarily the best solution for summer on AS bottom line.

jiburi
Not necessarily. There is a "peak" season to Hawaii during the summer because a lot of families will travel to Hawaii while the kids are on vacation. US Airways adds flights out of Phoenix to Hawaii during the summer, too. AA is adding a third nonstop from DFW to HNL on Saturdays during the summer. AS is doing the same.
formeraa is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 4:59 pm
  #11  
azj
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,576
Originally Posted by jjka
PDX-HNL suddenly going 9x/week from June 2015. This comes on the heels of DL announcing they are resuming PDX-HNL. Coincidence or is AS fighting back?
DL is adding flights during the winter holiday peak. AS is adding 2 weekly flights during the summer peak. I don't see how AS would be fighting back at anything.

As for "damaging" Hawaiian, as mentioned by someone else, adding these 2 flights still leaves them offering about 600 less seats a week than HA. Given HAL's loads and price point out of PDX, I don't think they're worried.
azj is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2015, 6:30 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by azj
As for "damaging" Hawaiian, as mentioned by someone else, adding these 2 flights still leaves them offering about 600 less seats a week than HA. Given HAL's loads and price point out of PDX, I don't think they're worried.
anytime there are more seats in the market it will surpress fares because more airlines and flights will be competing for the same passenger. As the price drops more will fly, but the airline makes less money.

In the end this causes someone to pull out. Hawaiian used to run PDX-OGG and it was a fine flight with reasonable fares. Competition caused both Alaska and Hawaiian to keep fares in check. But in the end Hawaiian realized they could do better and maximize its yield by redeploying the planes somewhere else. As Hawaiian left PDX-OGG the fares have skyrocketed.

Competition is good, until one finds they can make more money elsewhere.
WebTraveler is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2015, 1:23 am
  #13  
azj
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,576
Originally Posted by WebTraveler
anytime there are more seats in the market it will surpress fares because more airlines and flights will be competing for the same passenger. As the price drops more will fly, but the airline makes less money.

In the end this causes someone to pull out. Hawaiian used to run PDX-OGG and it was a fine flight with reasonable fares. Competition caused both Alaska and Hawaiian to keep fares in check. But in the end Hawaiian realized they could do better and maximize its yield by redeploying the planes somewhere else. As Hawaiian left PDX-OGG the fares have skyrocketed.

Competition is good, until one finds they can make more money elsewhere.
Not all capacity added will cause the depression of fares and create a loser. If the market can warrant more seats and a profit, it's all good. If the additional capacity causes those in the market to slash their fares to fill their seats, we've got a problem. I suspect an incremental and small addition of 2 weekly flights in the peak season, when the airlines command their highest fares won't do any damage.

True... PDX-OGG on HAL was a casualty of being able to use limited resources in a more profitable environment. I wouldn't be shocked if this route returns when the 321neo's arrive, if not sooner.
azj is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2015, 6:16 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by jiburi
Hawaii isn't in "high season" during summer when rest of US is also experiencing warmer weather. Additional deployment to the island is not necesasarily the best solution for summer on AS bottom line.

jiburi
You are simply wrong here. The state government publishes statistics on visitor arrivals by air. Visit counts peak in the summer - not the winter.


http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/visitor/tourism/
3Cforme is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2015, 7:03 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by azj
Not all capacity added will cause the depression of fares and create a loser. If the market can warrant more seats and a profit, it's all good. If the additional capacity causes those in the market to slash their fares to fill their seats, we've got a problem. I suspect an incremental and small addition of 2 weekly flights in the peak season, when the airlines command their highest fares won't do any damage.

True... PDX-OGG on HAL was a casualty of being able to use limited resources in a more profitable environment. I wouldn't be shocked if this route returns when the 321neo's arrive, if not sooner.
You are right, 2 flights a week probably won't upset the balance too much. But is it just these two, or is Delta jumping back into the market.

PDX-OGG returning on Hawaiian can make sense, but with those planes it's between 220 and 240 seats added with each flight. Can the market sustain that daily at the current fares? Doubtful and that's where it gets into trouble for the airline....they could go back to the alternate day flight, which they ran for a number of years before going daily. We'll have to see. But Alaska likely won't stand by idle either....maybe adding more, and this is where it all starts getting out of whack.

But it's all a game....
WebTraveler is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.