Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AF "suspending" routes from TLS - for winter only or for good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2014, 9:07 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Programs: Eurostar Carte Blanche, SBB-CFF-FFS GA-AG, SNCF Grand Voyageur LeClub
Posts: 7,836
AF "suspending" routes from TLS - for winter only or for good?

AF is "suspending" the following routes from TLS:
  1. Berlin
  2. Hamburg
  3. Casablanca
  4. Venice
  5. Athens
  6. Malaga
  7. Seville
  8. Malta
  9. Naples
  10. Prague

According to some sources this is only for the winter season, with Marrakech being the only non-domestic route kept for the winter season.

I wonder whether this reduction is only for the winter season or whether this is simply folding together the Bases de Province plans.

AF also reduces the number of flights between TLS and ORY by 2 to 25, but brings overall capacity on the Paris routes (ORY and CDG) up by deploying more A320 and A321.
San Gottardo is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2014, 9:22 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,557
http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2014...-toulouse.html

I believe that AF typically suspends 3 or 4 routes during the winter (Athenes, Berlin and Malaga are typically suspended), but ten is a strong signal. They had increased the number of leisure destinations but EZY is gaining at TLS (and NCE) and the "bases de province" was a failure to compete with them and other LCCs (sorry orbitmic).
brunos is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2014, 8:50 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Programs: FB LTPE, BAEC GGL, EK Blue, SK Gold, Marriott Amb+LTT, IHG Diamond Amb, Accorhotels Silver
Posts: 1,960
Originally Posted by brunos
http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2014...-toulouse.html

I believe that AF typically suspends 3 or 4 routes during the winter (Athenes, Berlin and Malaga are typically suspended), but ten is a strong signal. They had increased the number of leisure destinations but EZY is gaining at TLS (and NCE) and the "bases de province" was a failure to compete with them and other LCCs (sorry orbitmic).
I think we all know that Bases de Provinces would have been a good idea only if it came with a dramatic change in cost and operation structure.
I am pretty sure these routes (not all of them, though) would have been working if operated by Transavia, maybe adding AF code shares to attract the few people travelling for Business purposes.
What has been done (operating them like regular AF flights, just without J/W service) is a failure, for sure.
olivedel is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2014, 7:56 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DUS/CGN/NAP
Programs: M&M/Millemiglia/BAEC
Posts: 16
I'm not sure about the other routes, but NAP already is a "sunny" seasonal one, so being suspended for the winter season looks pretty obvious to me.
It's been operated during winter a few (maybe a couple?) years ago, but the operational days were terrible for people working in the aerospace industry around TLS who wanted to come back home for the w/e.
Still, AF provincial bases has proven to be a not-so-good idea, let's put it in this way.
flapane is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.