Community
Wiki Posts
Search

rumor....re new yyz terminal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 8:40 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 37
rumor....re new yyz terminal

wonder if anyone has heard this one and can confirm or deny -
AC will not be moving into Terminal New in October as originally planned. Move is delayed until late spring/early summer 2004.
agayyz is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 8:43 pm
  #2  
Company Representative - Air Canada
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 24,224
I've heard a similar rumour. That's probably why they cancelled all the staff training for T1-new. Also heard it's something stupid that GTAA did that led to it.

[This message has been edited by Empress (edited 07-26-2003).]
Andrew Yiu is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 8:53 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 37
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Empress:
I've heard a similar rumour. That's probably why they cancelled all the staff training for T1-new. Also heard it's something stupid that GTAA did that led to it.

[This message has been edited by Empress (edited 07-26-2003).]
</font>
That's what I heard as well, my source will have more details on Monday. Should be interesting.
agayyz is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 9:00 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winnipeg, MB, CANADA
Posts: 504
The GTAA website has no information about a delay about AC's move to T1-New.
cslusarc is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 5:41 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chilling with penguins
Posts: 13,050
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Empress:
Also heard it's something stupid that GTAA did that led to it. </font>
If I may ask, what did the GTAA do / not do?
YOWkid is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 4:31 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,190
The FINANCIAL PEST is reporting that T1New may not be operating until the 2nd Q of 2004. Apparently major problems with the luggage system have definitely postponed the October opening. However, GTAA spokesperson denied this is the cause of the delay, but refused to eloborate further. Another blow for AC, which is to be the major tenant and user of T1New.

Even worse news is that the cost of borrowing by the GTAA will be rising due to downgrading of their credit rating, and thus their need to find new revenue. That means higher passenger fees.

Sorry, but the NP/FP website has not been updated with this story which appears on page FP1 and FP5 of today's paper. BTW anyone else notice those NATIONAL PEST ads featuring Gerry Schwartz?

"If I may ask, what did the GTAA do / not do? " Greater Toronto Airport Authority is the not for profit organization that owns and operates YYZ [and Pickering] -- albeit the feds still own the land, they own everything else --and is one of about a dozen such authorities which own and operate YVR, YYC, YEG, YWG, YOW, YUL, YHZ, etc.

[This message has been edited by Shareholder (edited 07-29-2003).]
Shareholder is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 11:27 am
  #7  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: YYZ/YHM/BUF
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold, MR Plat
Posts: 4,212
Thankfully the baggage system at the modern BUF airport terminal is working just fine.
FlyerAl is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 1:24 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,547
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Shareholder:
The FINANCIAL PEST is reporting that T1New may not be operating until the 2nd Q of 2004. Apparently major problems with the luggage system have definitely postponed the October opening.
[This message has been edited by Shareholder (edited 07-29-2003).]
</font>
Hmm...shades of Denver International.

airbus320 is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 3:26 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Shareholder:
"If I may ask, what did the GTAA do / not do? " Greater Toronto Airport Authority is the not for profit organization that owns and operates YYZ [and Pickering] -- albeit the feds still own the land, they own everything else --and is one of about a dozen such authorities which own and operate YVR, YYC, YEG, YWG, YOW, YUL, YHZ, etc.

[This message has been edited by Shareholder (edited 07-29-2003).]
</font>
ONT voted for the Wrong party, we always get shafted! We pay all the Federal taxes with Alberta and get nothing back!
why fly is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 3:29 pm
  #10  
Company Representative - Air Canada
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 24,224
I heard it's more stupid than just problems with the baggage system. You've just got to wait and see.
Andrew Yiu is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 4:43 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,547
Here is the link to the National Post article.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?A22751E65
airbus320 is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 8:24 pm
  #12  
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by FlyerAl:
Thankfully the baggage system at the modern BUF airport terminal is working just fine. </font>
I was at BUF today and it was like an armed camp--the party I was meeting had a very heavy bag and they would not let me inside the bldg to help with the bag;they had a sort of lockdown only pax were allowed inside the bldg. What a pain. It took my party over 30 minutes to a bag.Some efficiency!!!!!
parnel is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:04 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 37
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Empress:
I heard it's more stupid than just problems with the baggage system. You've just got to wait and see. </font>
Apparently stupid just doesn't describe it adequately.
agayyz is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:18 pm
  #14  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: YYZ/YHM/BUF
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold, MR Plat
Posts: 4,212
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by parnel:
I was at BUF today and it was like an armed camp--the party I was meeting had a very heavy bag and they would not let me inside the bldg to help with the bag;they had a sort of lockdown only pax were allowed inside the bldg. What a pain. It took my party over 30 minutes to a bag.Some efficiency!!!!!</font>
The airport authority must've heard you were coming Well at least the luggage system is working and they got their heavy bag. Seriously, I hope everything is okay this weekend as I'm scheduled to fly out of there Friday afternoon.
FlyerAl is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 1:23 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Shareholder:
Apparently major problems with the luggage system have definitely postponed the October opening.</font>
A bit like the new Denver airport some years ago. Does nobody ever do a post-mortem on these project snafus?
LondonElite is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.