Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

UA, BA or AA for LHR-SFO award travel?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA, BA or AA for LHR-SFO award travel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 1999, 1:56 am
  #1  
Original Member
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Hong Kong soon to be London
Posts: 208
UA, BA or AA for LHR-SFO award travel?

I am planning to use most of my mileage for leisure travel between London and San Francisco. As a general principle, I prefer to use miles to upgrade from the lowest eligible coach fare to business class rather than use miles for the ticket itself.

My question is this: should I accumulate miles in the UA program, the AA program or the BA program? Which offers the best combination of low fares and low mileage requirements to upgrade? Any thoughts would be appreciated.


------------------
Cheers,
HKF
Hong Kong Flyer is offline  
Old Apr 2, 1999, 4:36 am
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Half the World & More and then some.
Programs: BA, SQ, AA, QF, CX, VS
Posts: 1,202
HKFlyer-

Which frequent flyer programme are you on? I think at one time, you said that CX was your preferred airline. If you are on AsiaMiles, you can upgrade on a BA ticket to SFO.

But if not, try sticking with AA's programme and upgrade with AA. I am unfamiliar with BA's programme as it involves different procedures. But I think BA does not have upgrade possibilities.

I hope it helps.
Celestar340 is offline  
Old Apr 2, 1999, 5:26 am
  #3  
Original Member
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Hong Kong soon to be London
Posts: 208
I have about 300,000 United Miles and about 100,000 American Airlines miles. (I put all my Cathay miles on American's program) I believe I can convert all the UA miles to BA miles 1:1 through Diners Club, so I am pretty flexible.

I am particularly interested whether, on a going forward basis, to accumulate UA miles, AA miles, or BA miles.

------------------
Cheers,
HKF
Hong Kong Flyer is offline  
Old Apr 2, 1999, 8:11 am
  #4  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,433
HKF - BA will only allow upgrades on full fare World Traveller tickets, and a US - Europe upgrade will cost you 40k miles.

This option is available only to US Exec Club members - the UK and Global Executive Clubs do not allow members to purchase upgrades.


So if you're looking to upgrade a discount ticket, you will probably be better off with one of the US-based airlines.

(Incidentally, a US - Europe Club award seat will cost you 80k)
baobab is offline  
Old Apr 2, 1999, 11:28 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 19,523
HongKongFlyer, the lowest fare (last October) that I have ever had SFO-LHR that was upgradable was $476 R/T on United. There was a $389 R/T available at the time, but it was not upgradable. The miles for upgrade were a total of 40,000 R/T. Good Luck.
PremEx is offline  
Old Apr 2, 1999, 11:40 am
  #6  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: New York City
Posts: 3,506
As previously noted, UA would appear to be the best bet. Also, I believe that they are the only airline to fly SFO --> LHR nonstop using the comfortable 777. BA and VS fly nonstop using the 747 instead.
leroy11 is offline  
Old Apr 6, 1999, 7:32 am
  #7  
Original Member
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Hong Kong soon to be London
Posts: 208
Thanks for the feedback. I guess I will stick with UA.

I have read many of you discuss how much you love the 777, and I agree it is a nice airplane. However, in my opinion, upstairs on a 747 is still the best way to travel long haul.
Hong Kong Flyer is offline  
Old Apr 6, 1999, 9:43 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,065
HKF: I agree. I much prefer a 747.
Nick
Merry is offline  
Old Apr 6, 1999, 11:04 am
  #9  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Pasadena, CA. USA
Posts: 1,438
This may be a bit late, but you can enroll in AA's platinum challenge program, fly AA and use your miles to upgrade (unlike UA, AA will let you upgrade internationally on all fares, I think).
kyklin is offline  
Old Apr 6, 1999, 11:26 am
  #10  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,626
Apples and Oranges, guys. Assume (for Merry's sake) that BA's 747s are "better" than UA's 777s. The UA 777s are still "better" than the UA 747s. ESPECIALLY the dreaded 747 OP (my fate for 13 hours this friday)...IMHO
kokonutz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.