Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New Route: Toronto - Kalamazoo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2001 | 4:52 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: YYZ
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Cathay Pacific Asia Miles
Posts: 625
New Route: Toronto - Kalamazoo

Air Alliance introduces daily non-stop service between Kalamazoo and Toronto

Air Canada partner, Air Alliance is pleased to announce the introduction of daily non-stop air service between Kalamazoo and Toronto's Pearson International Airport commencing June 4, 2001. In celebration of the launch of service, an introductory fare of $129.00 USD roundtrip is being offered until May 7, 2001.

Additionally, members of Air Canada's frequent flyer program, Aeroplan, can take advantage of a one-time double mile offer between June 4 and August 4, 2001, on all fare types.

For further information, click here.
Agincourt is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2001 | 8:17 pm
  #2  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 3,373
I would sing, I gotta gal in Kalamazoo, but everyone would know I was lying...

AC*SE is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2001 | 8:23 pm
  #3  
5M150 Countries Visited25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat | TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,969
Okay, I'll sing it....
Dorian is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2001 | 9:54 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,452
Perhaps AC will launch a direct service to Timbuktu as well[?] Nice and warm there I would expect...

Air Georgian Limited, operating under the brand name Air Alliance, will operate this route with state-of-the-art, Beech 1900D aircraft, featuring stand-up cabin, reclining leather seats and under-seat storage.
State of the art!? LMAO I didn't know these features were so revolutionary in air travel! Well at least we know that Fisch is a fan of the leather seats...


[This message has been edited by Fly Boy (edited 04-20-2001).]
Fly Boy is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2001 | 10:07 pm
  #5  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: YYZ/YHM/BUF
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold, MR Plat
Posts: 4,212
ROFLMAO!! This just makes me want to go out and buy a ticket to Kalamazoo!

You know, I have now figured out AC's little scheme. They're trying to fend off arguments that there aren't any reward seats available. That must be it! So when someone complains that they can't find any seats available for a trip to YVR, LAS, MIA, or BDA, AC will turn around and say "Oh, but there are plenty of seats available to Greensboro, Kalamazoo, and Indianapolis!"

[This message has been edited by FlyerAl (edited 04-20-2001).]
FlyerAl is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2001 | 8:16 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, Breezy 2
Posts: 12,608
I like the fact that a "stand up cabin" is a feature...
ElmhurstNick is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2001 | 11:02 am
  #7  
exAC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The combined population of Kalamazoo and Battle Creek [376,000] is larger than these Canadian metro areas.

Halifax (Nova Scotia) 356.0

Victoria (British Columbia) 317.5

Windsor (Ontario) 304.4

Oshawa (Ontario) 297.9

Saskatoon (Saskatchewan) 232.6

Regina (Saskatchewan) 200.5

St. John's (Newfoundland) 175.1

Chicoutimi Jonquire (Quebec) 160.1

Sudbury (Ontario) 157.1

Sherbrooke (Quebec) 152.9

Trois-Rivires (Quebec) 141.8

Thunder Bay (Ontario) 126.3

Saint John (New Brunswick) 127.7

 
Old Apr 21, 2001 | 11:40 am
  #8  
ALW
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 8,573
Maybe the "stand-up cabin" is in contrast to the CRJs, which are not.

andrew
ALW is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.