![]() |
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670618)
Denver is not deliberately designed to penalize customers not flying UA.
|
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670618)
you people keep using the word "current".
that word.... i do not think it means what you think it means. Example: The OP is currently posting vociferously because they currently have a problem with how the current connector tunnel is being used.
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670618)
there will NOT be a train. there will NOT be an APM.
the time penalty on any customers not flying DL to SLC is a PERMANENT FEATURE of the new SLC. https://slcairport.com/thenewslc/the...lc-fact-sheet/
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670618)
with respect to your argument about DEN, please read the wiki on post hoc, ergo propter hoc:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc.
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670618)
Denver is not deliberately designed to penalize customers not flying UA. Enjoy the day I am off for a walk about. |
Originally Posted by FlyingUnderTheRadar
(Post 33670704)
When I flew into DEN on DL I could only take the train. When train broke down. I could not get to Denver. That is pretty big penalty. Not building a people tunnel was a deliberate design decision. May not have been deliberate to penalize customers not flying UA but penalized they got.
UA in concourse B always required use of the train. |
DL operates out of B now, and that will continue even after the build is complete so what is the point of this thread? Don't visit SLC because it will take 5 more minutes to exit the terminal than it did in the past? The new terminal is so much more efficient from an aircraft movement perspective that it will cut gate holds immensely so it's probably a wash, except for your poor legs.
|
Originally Posted by bse118
(Post 33670435)
So similar in walking distances to the distances one would walk on connections between the farthest apart AA gates at places like CLT, PHL, ORD. Also without people mover / trains.
However, if you have a late night arrival into the high numbered A gates the exit from terminal A is frequently closed and they deliver bags at the B/C carousels. This means a walk to the B terminal exit and over the "bridge" to baggage claim. That's about 3600 feet. I've walked it many times, along with many even longer walks at other airports. |
Originally Posted by Sheikh Yerbooty
(Post 33670628)
This thread has supreme elements of comedy gold, not least the drama manufactured by the OP. We're talking about a short 1 kilometer walk, something everybody between the ages of 5 and 65 should be able to perform effortlessly, barring any diseases or handicaps.
|
Originally Posted by SamOF
(Post 33670108)
Idle curiosity: were there 30,827 people already with the username seat7a.speedbird2?
on 28th August 2003 (“030828”) and sat in seat 7A for their journey… and presumably are proud of having done so which would explain why they chose this specific screen-name |
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
(Post 33671142)
So it's yet another public structure built without regard for those with mobility issues.
|
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
(Post 33671142)
So it's yet another public structure built without regard for those with mobility issues.
|
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
(Post 33671142)
So it's yet another public structure built without regard for those with mobility issues.
|
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670521)
your new tunnel will shave off 1000 feet to B15, and still be 3x the distance of any of your "facts"....
next? Yes, the SLC walk is annoying but it isn't some sort of crazy deviation from the norm in modern airports. |
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670618)
you people keep using the word "current".
that word.... i do not think it means what you think it means. <reading comprehension insult redacted> there will NOT be a train. there will NOT be an APM. the time penalty on any customers not flying DL to SLC is a PERMANENT FEATURE of the new SLC. with respect to your argument about DEN, please read the wiki on post hoc, ergo propter hoc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc Denver is not deliberately designed to penalize customers not flying UA. So it’s not just non-DL pax. DL flights do show up in other concourses. Also, try an LAX international flight connection where you arrive at TBIT and the outbound is T6 sometime. |
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670360)
The Brethren referred to it as GSLC from 1847 until the 1890s.
|
Originally Posted by Antarius
(Post 33670485)
This whole thread is needlessly dramatic.
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33670517)
to each their own
Originally Posted by seat7a.speedbird2.030828
(Post 33669548)
...the idiots that thought this was an acceptable design should be drawn, quartered, shot, and if there is any electrical activity at all remaining in their spinal cords, dunked in caustic soda, just to be sure.
|
Originally Posted by SJOGuy
(Post 33671751)
They always flew Delta. ;)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.