- We all feel your pain
- you actually made out well from UA in terms of refund and miles offered - UA’s obligations under the COC aren’t what you wish they were - you would likely be best served by moving on and not putting your mileage plus account at risk |
Originally Posted by cmculp
(Post 35967366)
,,, - you would likely be best served by moving on and not putting your mileage plus account at risk
The negative PR, much like the PR blowback AA is getting for closing accounts would be a factor for UA to consider but AA is claiming fraud, a very different situation. UA has closed accounts for fraud and selling upgrades / miles but the again is a very different situation. |
Originally Posted by lamphs
(Post 35967324)
Re: the OP. If I was handed the DL tickets, I'd have a reasonable expectation that I was good to go without further ado. As a fairly experienced flyer, I don't think I'd give it a 2nd thought. I'd be quite surprised if I couldn't have checked in with DL.
I don't hang-up, leave the club, or check-in counter until I have possession of the BPs, electronically. |
Originally Posted by brooks8970
(Post 35965702)
Does anyone know... If I do go the small claims route, do I risk United suspending or terminating my mileage plus account?
If you pursue, the bigger concern is whether UA has a firm(s) on retainer with barred attorneys in the states where they operate. They may have encountered such challenges often enough that it's worth their while/pays for itself. And if they do, are you prepared to retain your own counsel, or to go toe-to-toe yourself with an attorney that does this for a living? Be ready.
Originally Posted by lincolnjkc
(Post 35966478)
That was my thought exactly... I can't even say UA definitively screwed up, let alone to the point where they'd be liable to eat OP's alternate travel choices -- something they explicitly are not liable for. (There is a huge gap between "the customer service could have been better" & legal liability)
Plus if OP "sues first and asks questions later" that puts UA in the position of (potentially) being able to force OP to pay their costs -- either for local representation or for flying a corporate attorney in to represent pro hac vice (is that even a thing in small claims?) Unless they've complied with the Rule 3(Q) requirement to essentially put UA on formal notice and wait 60 days. (I am not a lawyer but from my understanding in some states a lawyer *cannot* represent a corporate entity in small claims but an employee like JAXPax may -- IIRC California is one example, while in others corporations *must* be represented by an attorney admitted to practice law in that jurisdiction for a small claims suit, IIRC Ohio is one example) |
Originally Posted by brooks8970
(Post 35965728)
That's just not accurate. I have flown a lot.. obviously, not as much as the people on this thread, but enough to know the basic ropes. I was never given the option of a refund. I did receive one after my complaint. The only other option I was given was the automated booking after the connection was missed: to have my special needs 6 y/o daughter fly alone via ORD to SLC and me and my wife to fly on an alternate itinerary via SFO to SLC. I didn't even have to say no. The UA agent immediately realized they had screwed up. We were flying on two separate confirmation codes that had been linked by a UA rep. For whatever reason, the system unjoined the reservations in order to make that automated itinerary. This is Thanksgiving Sunday. Flights were booked solid. I have been in this situation before, and there are always options. There weren't in this case.. I spent 5 hours working with the UA reps to figure something out. At some point, you have to give up.
It would certainly be a factor when pleading for compassion in front of a judge. UA did rebook you but you found the option unacceptable due to your original decision to book your daughter on a separate reservation. |
Originally Posted by lincolnjkc
(Post 35966028)
In addition to UA deciding that they no longer wish to do business with you, if you do want to take this to court or a regulatory complaint ensure that you read and understand rule 3(q) of the contract of carriage which includes the right for UA to collect their attorneys fees from you should you not strictly comply with the requirements.
|
Originally Posted by brooks8970
(Post 35965702)
Does anyone know... If I do go the small claims route, do I risk United suspending or terminating my mileage plus account?
. . . . . . We are global entry customers so we knew we could speed through immigration. However, when we arrived at immigration, a United rep had commandeered the global entry line for non-paying customers to get through immigration in order to get to UA customers to the held flights which resulted in a 20 minute wait. This sealed the deal on our missed connection.
Originally Posted by JAXPax
(Post 35965627)
Don't confuse UA "could not purchase that space for you" with "UA will not purchase that space for you." Several airlines in this country without FIM agreements, such as one where I worked, whipped out a credit card, went to southwest.com and clicked BUY. Or have something like an Orbitz for Business portal to do so, ensuring that it complies with certain limits (like not buying a First seat just because it's all that's left on a DL flight). United has chosen to limit its OA rebooking options.
|
Originally Posted by jayer
(Post 35967777)
OK I'm curious what that looked like. Customs isn't run by the TSA guys. It's a sterile area with real armed CBP officers present to keep it that way. Even the baseline agents are far more serious about things and United GA's can't just wander in.
|
Originally Posted by clubord
(Post 35967788)
I was wondering if someone was going to catch on to that detail. Customs is definitely off limits to any gate agents, that’s their domain and they don’t mess around.
|
Originally Posted by jayer
(Post 35967777)
OK I'm curious what that looked like. Customs isn't run by the TSA guys. It's a sterile area with real armed CBP officers present to keep it that way. Even the baseline agents are far more serious about things to the point of being rather abrupt. United GA's can't just wander in and take over a Federal government function. Or so I thought. ....
|
I’m almost surprised this thread is still open now.
For years, I flew UA out of DL-dominated CVG - well before the likes of WN, etc. was flying there. Yeah, I had to connect 95% of the time, but it worked for me.
Originally Posted by AJNEDC
(Post 35965661)
There is absolutely a need to initiate a chargeback: The OP get's the credit for what he's charging back immediately or within days depending on his card company. United gets the opportunity to provide employment to someone to work the chargeback case. The employee working the case gets a paycheck. A win all around.
really, nothing they could charge back.
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 35965684)
United has no obligation to find an alternate flight. They wil generally do what they can, but they can also simply refund. It's entirely at their discretion as stated in the Contract of Carriage.
many agents (though admittedly not all) are trying to do their best to help. Acting aggressively toward them is likely to not help you get where you are going faster.
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 35965755)
I wish agents would not say they have linked reservations -- they have no such ability, they just say that because travelers ask for it. It does not exist. They can place a note in a PNR about another PNR but the rebooking systems do not see that and an agent will see it only if they go looking for it.
Booking on separate PNRs is a real risk, especially if you NEED to remain together. It’s not that you can’t manually get someone to get that outcome, but an automated system won’t, and by that time, best options might be already taken.
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 35966498)
While I understand the frustration of the OP, if I were the Small Claims Court judge listening to his recitation of the events, I’d probably lose most of my sympathy for his ordeal at the point he told the supervisor he would make his own plans and hung up. I definitely wouldn’t want to listen to allegations about the airline industry being in monopoly, or claims about the contract of carriage.
I’ve spent hours on the phone waiting to talk to a CSR after a flight cancellation. I know how frustrating it is. And the difference is, when I’m in that situation, I come prepared with an alternative flight in mind, and above all, I am as nice as I can be under the circumstances to the person on the other end of the line. That approach has never failed me. Agreed that hanging up the phone and telling the sup they were going to figure this out themselves was basically the sign to United that they didn’t have to deal with it. Like I said, understand the frustration. But what is UA supposed to do when the customer basically says ‘I’m going to do this myself’.
Originally Posted by brooks8970
(Post 35966846)
You're all so focused on the contract of carriage and your own experiences that you are unable to see how this situation differentiates from a normal IROPs. I have clarified things upthread that are being purposefully omitted in order to make a point and characterized as someone that would tell the judge United should pay me because the airline industry is a monopoly. If you want to make up your own hypothetical, please start a new thread.
you were refunded the miles for the unflown fare, which is all that’s required. Everything else on top of that was optional. There isn’t and shouldn’t be any expectation of them covering replacement airfare. Even travel delay insurance won’t - they rely on the original carrier to provide that - which they would have if you didn’t hang up and go your own way - and they cover the expenses you had as a result of the delay.
Originally Posted by lamphs
(Post 35967324)
Re: the OP. If I was handed the DL tickets, I'd have a reasonable expectation that I was good to go without further ado. As a fairly experienced flyer, I don't think I'd give it a 2nd thought. I'd be quite surprised if I couldn't have checked in with DL.
If OP actually had confirmed tickets with DL and subsequently had this issue, it would have been for DL to now resolve.
Originally Posted by clubord
(Post 35967788)
I was wondering if someone was going to catch on to that detail. Customs is definitely off limits to any gate agents, that’s their domain and they don’t mess around.
also not sure how this worked in reality. even if UA was controlling the CBP queue to GE, anyone without GE still can’t process through the area with kiosks. Seems something is off here. |
Originally Posted by emcampbe
(Post 35967917)
....
even if UA was controlling the CBP queue to GE, anyone without GE still can’t process through the area with kiosks. Seems something is off here. |
Originally Posted by Segments
(Post 35967670)
You mentioned the auto booking led to your special needs 6 y/o daughter being booked on a different flight from you and your wife since you were flying under different confirmation codes. Certainly this complicated rebooking. With the potential for IRROPS on a busy holiday weekend, I have to ask why the family wasn’t booked together?.
|
Originally Posted by txaggiemiles
(Post 35968095)
Pretty sure booking a 6 year old w/o a guardian is not allowed regardless of if they are special needs. More evidence that there might be just a bit more to the OP’s claim than we have been let on.
|
Originally Posted by txaggiemiles
(Post 35968095)
Pretty sure booking a 6 year old w/o a guardian is not allowed regardless of if they are special needs. More evidence that there might be just a bit more to the OP’s claim than we have been let on.
One reason for being on a separate PNR is one set of tickets are miles and another is paid. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.