FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   United Complaint - would love some feedback (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/2150147-united-complaint-would-love-some-feedback.html)

cmculp Feb 3, 2024 2:17 pm

- We all feel your pain
- you actually made out well from UA in terms of refund and miles offered
- UA’s obligations under the COC aren’t what you wish they were
​​​​​​- you would likely be best served by moving on and not putting your mileage plus account at risk

WineCountryUA Feb 3, 2024 2:39 pm


Originally Posted by cmculp (Post 35967366)
,,, ​​​​​- you would likely be best served by moving on and not putting your mileage plus account at risk

Can anyone point to a documented case of small claims action leading to an account closure and/or a bill for UA's legal fees? While possible, I am not aware of UA exercising that option for any others who have reported going the small claims route.

The negative PR, much like the PR blowback AA is getting for closing accounts would be a factor for UA to consider but AA is claiming fraud, a very different situation. UA has closed accounts for fraud and selling upgrades / miles but the again is a very different situation.

DataPlumber Feb 3, 2024 3:46 pm


Originally Posted by lamphs (Post 35967324)
Re: the OP. If I was handed the DL tickets, I'd have a reasonable expectation that I was good to go without further ado. As a fairly experienced flyer, I don't think I'd give it a 2nd thought. I'd be quite surprised if I couldn't have checked in with DL.

The reality is all the US airlines have agents that STILL don't know how to push e-tickets to other carriers. While it should be seamless, you're at the mercy of the skills of the agent. IME, there is a significant population of agents that would struggle working the counter at your local fast food joint.

I don't hang-up, leave the club, or check-in counter until I have possession of the BPs, electronically.

silverthief2 Feb 3, 2024 4:40 pm


Originally Posted by brooks8970 (Post 35965702)
Does anyone know... If I do go the small claims route, do I risk United suspending or terminating my mileage plus account?

There are many possible outcomes going this route, and this one doesn't seem too likely. And I don't have any information about how UA might respond, but ...

If you pursue, the bigger concern is whether UA has a firm(s) on retainer with barred attorneys in the states where they operate. They may have encountered such challenges often enough that it's worth their while/pays for itself. And if they do, are you prepared to retain your own counsel, or to go toe-to-toe yourself with an attorney that does this for a living? Be ready.


Originally Posted by lincolnjkc (Post 35966478)
That was my thought exactly... I can't even say UA definitively screwed up, let alone to the point where they'd be liable to eat OP's alternate travel choices -- something they explicitly are not liable for. (There is a huge gap between "the customer service could have been better" & legal liability)

Plus if OP "sues first and asks questions later" that puts UA in the position of (potentially) being able to force OP to pay their costs -- either for local representation or for flying a corporate attorney in to represent pro hac vice (is that even a thing in small claims?) Unless they've complied with the Rule 3(Q) requirement to essentially put UA on formal notice and wait 60 days.

(I am not a lawyer but from my understanding in some states a lawyer *cannot* represent a corporate entity in small claims but an employee like JAXPax may -- IIRC California is one example, while in others corporations *must* be represented by an attorney admitted to practice law in that jurisdiction for a small claims suit, IIRC Ohio is one example)

The OP should consider whether UA is ready for such things; IMO, it's a mistake to just assume UA won't bother with it or won't show up.

Segments Feb 3, 2024 5:08 pm


Originally Posted by brooks8970 (Post 35965728)
That's just not accurate. I have flown a lot.. obviously, not as much as the people on this thread, but enough to know the basic ropes. I was never given the option of a refund. I did receive one after my complaint. The only other option I was given was the automated booking after the connection was missed: to have my special needs 6 y/o daughter fly alone via ORD to SLC and me and my wife to fly on an alternate itinerary via SFO to SLC. I didn't even have to say no. The UA agent immediately realized they had screwed up. We were flying on two separate confirmation codes that had been linked by a UA rep. For whatever reason, the system unjoined the reservations in order to make that automated itinerary. This is Thanksgiving Sunday. Flights were booked solid. I have been in this situation before, and there are always options. There weren't in this case.. I spent 5 hours working with the UA reps to figure something out. At some point, you have to give up.

You mentioned the auto booking led to your special needs 6 y/o daughter being booked on a different flight from you and your wife since you were flying under different confirmation codes. Certainly this complicated rebooking. With the potential for IRROPS on a busy holiday weekend, I have to ask why the family wasn’t booked together?

It would certainly be a factor when pleading for compassion in front of a judge. UA did rebook you but you found the option unacceptable due to your original decision to book your daughter on a separate reservation.

SamOF Feb 3, 2024 5:38 pm


Originally Posted by lincolnjkc (Post 35966028)
In addition to UA deciding that they no longer wish to do business with you, if you do want to take this to court or a regulatory complaint ensure that you read and understand rule 3(q) of the contract of carriage which includes the right for UA to collect their attorneys fees from you should you not strictly comply with the requirements.

Section 3(Q) just says that a passenger has to attempt to email customer care with their complaint before initiating legal process. There's nothing more complicated there, and if a passenger does so (like the OP did) and provides up to 60 days for customer care to respond, UA can't collect attorney's fees.

jayer Feb 3, 2024 5:59 pm


Originally Posted by brooks8970 (Post 35965702)
Does anyone know... If I do go the small claims route, do I risk United suspending or terminating my mileage plus account?

. . . . . . We are global entry customers so we knew we could speed through immigration. However, when we arrived at immigration, a United rep had commandeered the global entry line for non-paying customers to get through immigration in order to get to UA customers to the held flights which resulted in a 20 minute wait. This sealed the deal on our missed connection.

OK I'm curious what that looked like. Customs isn't run by the TSA guys. It's a sterile area with real armed CBP officers present to keep it that way. Even the baseline agents are far more serious about things to the point of being rather abrupt. United GA's can't just wander in and take over a Federal government function. Or so I thought.


Originally Posted by JAXPax (Post 35965627)
Don't confuse UA "could not purchase that space for you" with "UA will not purchase that space for you." Several airlines in this country without FIM agreements, such as one where I worked, whipped out a credit card, went to southwest.com and clicked BUY. Or have something like an Orbitz for Business portal to do so, ensuring that it complies with certain limits (like not buying a First seat just because it's all that's left on a DL flight). United has chosen to limit its OA rebooking options.

I'm curious what time frame you worked in that capacity. Till about 5-10 years ago everybody signed tickets over to everybody else (except of course Southwest). Now they all but refuse to speak to any carrier outside of their own alliance--and barely to them.

clubord Feb 3, 2024 6:04 pm


Originally Posted by jayer (Post 35967777)
OK I'm curious what that looked like. Customs isn't run by the TSA guys. It's a sterile area with real armed CBP officers present to keep it that way. Even the baseline agents are far more serious about things and United GA's can't just wander in.

I was wondering if someone was going to catch on to that detail. Customs is definitely off limits to any gate agents, that’s their domain and they don’t mess around.

lincolnjkc Feb 3, 2024 6:17 pm


Originally Posted by clubord (Post 35967788)
I was wondering if someone was going to catch on to that detail. Customs is definitely off limits to any gate agents, that’s their domain and they don’t mess around.

While you need a customs seal on your badge airline agents can be present in the CBP area (I passed a half dozen people with UA name tags/uniforms providing direction between gate and Global Entry kiosk just a few minutes ago at IAD) I do strongly doubt a customs sealed UA agent just "commandeered" the GE lanes without CBP's approval -- CBP certainly does not mess around...

WineCountryUA Feb 3, 2024 7:01 pm


Originally Posted by jayer (Post 35967777)
OK I'm curious what that looked like. Customs isn't run by the TSA guys. It's a sterile area with real armed CBP officers present to keep it that way. Even the baseline agents are far more serious about things to the point of being rather abrupt. United GA's can't just wander in and take over a Federal government function. Or so I thought. ....

I believe I have seen UA escort (@SFO), to the head of the line or far lest CBP position, passengers on very tight connections. Seem to remember they were more suit types and I suspect proper arrangements were made in advance with CBP knowing this would happen.

emcampbe Feb 3, 2024 7:08 pm

I’m almost surprised this thread is still open now.

For years, I flew UA out of DL-dominated CVG - well before the likes of WN, etc. was flying there. Yeah, I had to connect 95% of the time, but it worked for me.


Originally Posted by AJNEDC (Post 35965661)
There is absolutely a need to initiate a chargeback: The OP get's the credit for what he's charging back immediately or within days depending on his card company. United gets the opportunity to provide employment to someone to work the chargeback case. The employee working the case gets a paycheck. A win all around.

OP got a refund for unflown segments, and seems those were miles. I assume any taxes for those segments would be refunded as well, but given they took the international segment and it was the domestic one they didn’t, it would be quite small.

really, nothing they could charge back.


Originally Posted by mahasamatman (Post 35965684)
United has no obligation to find an alternate flight. They wil generally do what they can, but they can also simply refund. It's entirely at their discretion as stated in the Contract of Carriage.

This. That’s why you have to be careful of how hard you push, and how you act. Agent is well within their right to just tell you they will be refunding you, but the magic buttons, and then you have no choice but to make your own arrangements home. Yes, you can get upset or frustrated. Taking that out on an agent is probably hard for many in these kinds of situations, but something I will just not do.

many agents (though admittedly not all) are trying to do their best to help. Acting aggressively toward them is likely to not help you get where you are going faster.


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 35965755)
I wish agents would not say they have linked reservations -- they have no such ability, they just say that because travelers ask for it. It does not exist. They can place a note in a PNR about another PNR but the rebooking systems do not see that and an agent will see it only if they go looking for it.

This.

Booking on separate PNRs is a real risk, especially if you NEED to remain together. It’s not that you can’t manually get someone to get that outcome, but an automated system won’t, and by that time, best options might be already taken.


Originally Posted by halls120 (Post 35966498)
While I understand the frustration of the OP, if I were the Small Claims Court judge listening to his recitation of the events, I’d probably lose most of my sympathy for his ordeal at the point he told the supervisor he would make his own plans and hung up. I definitely wouldn’t want to listen to allegations about the airline industry being in monopoly, or claims about the contract of carriage.

I’ve spent hours on the phone waiting to talk to a CSR after a flight cancellation. I know how frustrating it is. And the difference is, when I’m in that situation, I come prepared with an alternative flight in mind, and above all, I am as nice as I can be under the circumstances to the person on the other end of the line. That approach has never failed me.

exactly what I was saying before - have alternative available flights to feed, and be nice to the agent. Bringing some humor into the situation can help too, I’ve found.

Agreed that hanging up the phone and telling the sup they were going to figure this out themselves was basically the sign to United that they didn’t have to deal with it. Like I said, understand the frustration. But what is UA supposed to do when the customer basically says ‘I’m going to do this myself’.


Originally Posted by brooks8970 (Post 35966846)
You're all so focused on the contract of carriage and your own experiences that you are unable to see how this situation differentiates from a normal IROPs. I have clarified things upthread that are being purposefully omitted in order to make a point and characterized as someone that would tell the judge United should pay me because the airline industry is a monopoly. If you want to make up your own hypothetical, please start a new thread.

we’re focused on the CoC because that is the set of rules both you (as pax) and airline has agreed to go by. While I understand this is personal for you, as opposed to us, anything UA does beyond what the CoC spells out is a favor.

you were refunded the miles for the unflown fare, which is all that’s required. Everything else on top of that was optional. There isn’t and shouldn’t be any expectation of them covering replacement airfare. Even travel delay insurance won’t - they rely on the original carrier to provide that - which they would have if you didn’t hang up and go your own way - and they cover the expenses you had as a result of the delay.


Originally Posted by lamphs (Post 35967324)
Re: the OP. If I was handed the DL tickets, I'd have a reasonable expectation that I was good to go without further ado. As a fairly experienced flyer, I don't think I'd give it a 2nd thought. I'd be quite surprised if I couldn't have checked in with DL.

Semantics, but I suspect OP was never handed ‘tickets’. They likely had a reservation/PNR that was never confirmed. Not uncommon if things weren’t done correctly. Always better, esp. within 24 hours of flight, to have new airline confirm details before walking away.

If OP actually had confirmed tickets with DL and subsequently had this issue, it would have been for DL to now resolve.


Originally Posted by clubord (Post 35967788)
I was wondering if someone was going to catch on to that detail. Customs is definitely off limits to any gate agents, that’s their domain and they don’t mess around.

yup - though I suppose UA could have had permission to have an agent there? But to control the line?

also not sure how this worked in reality.

even if UA was controlling the CBP queue to GE, anyone without GE still can’t process through the area with kiosks. Seems something is off here.

WineCountryUA Feb 3, 2024 7:13 pm


Originally Posted by emcampbe (Post 35967917)
....

even if UA was controlling the CBP queue to GE, anyone without GE still can’t process through the area with kiosks. Seems something is off here.

The CBP agent handling GE folks can process others, just the traditional way..

txaggiemiles Feb 3, 2024 9:12 pm


Originally Posted by Segments (Post 35967670)
You mentioned the auto booking led to your special needs 6 y/o daughter being booked on a different flight from you and your wife since you were flying under different confirmation codes. Certainly this complicated rebooking. With the potential for IRROPS on a busy holiday weekend, I have to ask why the family wasn’t booked together?.

Pretty sure booking a 6 year old w/o a guardian is not allowed regardless of if they are special needs. More evidence that there might be just a bit more to the OP’s claim than we have been let on.

emcampbe Feb 3, 2024 9:34 pm


Originally Posted by txaggiemiles (Post 35968095)
Pretty sure booking a 6 year old w/o a guardian is not allowed regardless of if they are special needs. More evidence that there might be just a bit more to the OP’s claim than we have been let on.

To be fair, an agent can book a child on their own, without needing to be a UM, if there is an adult companion on the same flights. An agent would need to do it, and the child could not check in online - that would require an agent as well. This also used to happen sometimes when a reservation was split - particularly for CPUs (which should be rarer now that splits aren’t necessary to be on the upgrade standby list at the airport).

WineCountryUA Feb 3, 2024 9:59 pm


Originally Posted by txaggiemiles (Post 35968095)
Pretty sure booking a 6 year old w/o a guardian is not allowed regardless of if they are special needs. More evidence that there might be just a bit more to the OP’s claim than we have been let on.

The process for booking a child on a separate PNR without being an unaccomplished minor but traveling with an adult on a different PNR is covered in the wiki of UA unaccompanied minor (UCM) policy - nonstop only, age (now 14 & lower), same cabin. It is a very standard process.
One reason for being on a separate PNR is one set of tickets are miles and another is paid.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.