FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   [Unconfirmed] UA Preparing to Sell E+ at Booking as Separate Cabin (like DL C+) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1994612-unconfirmed-ua-preparing-sell-e-booking-separate-cabin-like-dl-c.html)

findark Nov 8, 2019 8:08 am

[Unconfirmed] UA Preparing to Sell E+ at Booking as Separate Cabin (like DL C+)
 
Update
United has confirmed that they have filed these fares "as a very limited test in a small number of markets that displays EconomyPlus as a booking option during shopping to allow customers to easily shop and compare different seat offerings". Ostensibly "EconomyPlus continues to be a part of the Economy cabin and is not a separate fare." (This is true with the current technical implementation.)


(Reposting as a new topic since I think this is big news - props to jsloan for originally catching on to this in https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unit...e-classes.html)

Summary
United filed a bunch of fares on domestic routes on Monday morning which represent the ability to purchase Economy Plus at booking as part of the ticket class. This was done with no announcement and this fact has not yet been advertised on the United website, so I'm still calling this "unconfirmed" but you can book these fares right now if you know how to search for them. They are priced as a fixed differential to Economy (so they are probably more or less than a specific E+ on a specific flight, and it can be worth pricing both ways, although I generally expect the ticket-at-booking solution to be a little more expensive) and book into B class, and so are eligible for 150% PQM (travel by 31 December) and Instant Upgrades for elites (for now, anyway). These have been filed in select domestic markets only, and it is unknown whether UA will tweak the system or otherwise change the conditions prior to officially announcing this. They could also drop these fares as silently as they introduced them -- hence "unconfirmed" at this point :)

Mechanics
It looks like United is preparing to sell Economy Plus as a separate class of service rather than a seat selection fee. This is similar to the way Delta sells its Comfort Plus seats -- instead of paying a fee to choose a seat in Comfort Plus, they treat it as a separate class of service and you can purchase a ticket in Comfort Plus class (W or S booking codes) or upgrade to Comfort Plus via normal upgrade means (DL Plat and DL Diamond get currently last-seat-available instant upgrades to C+ on non-Basic Economy fares). On Monday 4 November, UA introduced a new set of fares into select domestic markets for this purpose (as of writing, I see them on LAX-ORD, EWR-ORD, SFO-EWR, LAX-EWR, but not e.g. SFO-IAD) which functionally allow you to purchase a ticket which "includes" Economy Plus seating as part of the tariff.

These tickets are filed as a Premium Economy type fare on the backend, but they will book into B class and therefore always into the Economy cabin. They seem to be piggy-backing on the code which allows true Premium Economy (O/A/R fares) which delegate to B class on non-equipped routes to choose Economy Plus seats for free. As of right now, there is no published policy about these fares, but they are live and can be booked. As a B class fare, they earn 150% PQM and are instant-upgrade eligible, in addition to allowing a Silver or non-elite to choose any Economy Plus seat free of charge. I would exercise caution when booking a fare like this right now since there is no policy or announcement, which means any of these features could change without notice and without any compensation ("hey I read findark's article on FlyerTalk" is not going to get you far when arguing for a refund).

Pricing
These fares are filed as fixed-differential fares, usually down to K (so there is no differential to G). Each fare carries the standard dual-inventory check with its secondary code. The net effect is that the "Economy Plus fare" (B) is always available at a fixed difference to the current lowest Economy price, just like Basic Economy and First Class fares (prime inventory allowing). Despite being filed as Premium Economy type fares (ZZP), they are filed in parallel with true domestic PE fares for p.s. routes and carry a different branded fare designator of 'P' (in seventh position) -- true domestic differential PE fares are type 'O'. Here is an example of the W4/Q fare family filed on SFO to EWR illustrating the pricing (lowest P added in for contrast):


Code:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cxr    Basis      BC  Cbn    Price  Tp  AP  Min  Max  Days    Rf 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 UA  WAA4AQBN      N  Y    $280.00  OW  14                      N
 UA  WAA4AQDN      W  Y    $315.00  OW  14                      N
 UA  WAA4AQPN      B  Y    $444.00  OW  14                      N
 UA  WAA4AQON      A  W    $514.00  OW  14                      N
..
 UA  VAP30UPN      P  J    $694.00  OW  30                      N


As a typical example, the base of the fare family is WAA4AQDN, which will retail for $329.30 a/i.

Basic Economy is available for a difference of ($35), and Economy Plus for $129, while true Premium Economy is an extra $199. Business on p.s. routes remains non-differential with an advertised $708.30 price for P fares.

How to Book
Right now, United has not announced or otherwise surfaced these fares. However, they are currently an option for booking if for whatever reason you want the upgrade priority, extra PQM, or E+ access for the price. You can price one on united.com by doing an Advanced Search for B class fares -- this will pretty much always be the least expensive B fare. Note that while these will confirm into B inventory, like any differential fare the price is dependent on the lower secondary inventory check and they are not refundable or other things you might associate with a "traditional" B fare. Note that these are only in some domestic markets, so if you don't see any discount B fares when doing your search, your market is probably not valid yet. And finally, a repeat of my caution -- UA has simply published some fares, not made a press release, so any of this is subject to change without notice even if you have already purchased one of these fares!

jsloan Nov 8, 2019 8:19 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715110)
so any of this is subject to change without notice even if you have already purchased one of these fares!

I agree with all of this -- and note that this is potentially a giant downgrade for UA Gold, if they copy DL and begin waitlisting E+ "upgrades" -- except for this statement. The E+ access is coded right into the fare rules. If you buy one of these fares, you should be guaranteed E+ access regardless of what changes UA may later make.

If they move forward with this, I expect to see the Instant Upgrade benefit change. As it stands, on routes where you can find PZ space (PN for 1K/GS), this will likely be the cheapest way to confirm F at booking, with the caveat that you might end up in Y in SDC/IRROPS.

Kacee Nov 8, 2019 8:20 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715110)
It looks like United is preparing to sell Economy Plus as a separate class of service rather than a seat selection fee.

This would be a massive devaluation of the Premier E+ benefit.

Coming right on the heels of a massive increase in the qualification requirements.

Originally Posted by jsloan (Post 31715161)
I agree with all of this -- and note that this is potentially a giant downgrade for UA Gold, if they copy DL and begin waitlisting E+ "upgrades" -- except for this statement.

There's been lots of speculation about various ways UA may hose MMs and this would certainly be one.

findark Nov 8, 2019 8:30 am


Originally Posted by jsloan (Post 31715161)
I agree with all of this -- and note that this is potentially a giant downgrade for UA Gold, if they copy DL and begin waitlisting E+ "upgrades" -- except for this statement. The E+ access is coded right into the fare rules. If you buy one of these fares, you should be guaranteed E+ access regardless of what changes UA may later make.

Right now there is nothing in the fare rules about Economy Plus -- the computer just happens to let you pick an E+ seat for free. Given the only way to book is to manually search for B class Economy, and there is no marketing about "Economy Plus included" if there was some change to no longer give free E+ on this fare and a sweep kicked you out... I'm not sure there would be any recourse. Now, I don't think that's going to happen, but I doubt there would be any legitimate recourse.

I'm just trying to warn less experienced readers since while I am pretty convinced about everything I wrote, we are all leaping to conclusions based on some fares they quietly filed and the free E+ the computer happens to assign when you book them.

Also noting a pretty weird template on them right now... because "no E+" on the Chariot (but not really)?


Code:

THE FARE COMPONENT MUST NOT BE
    BUT NOT ON CRJ-CANADAIR REGIONAL.
AND
THE FARE COMPONENT MUST NOT BE
    BUT NOT ON EMBRAER.
AND
THE FARE COMPONENT MUST BE
    ON NONSTOP FLIGHTS/SAME FLIGHT NUMBER.



Originally Posted by jsloan (Post 31715161)
If they move forward with this, I expect to see the Instant Upgrade benefit change. As it stands, on routes where you can find PZ space (PN for 1K/GS), this will likely be the cheapest way to confirm F at booking, with the caveat that you might end up in Y in SDC/IRROPS.

I wonder if they could pull out a fare class (G maybe) to use in E+ bookings to remove the Instant Upgrade issue.


Originally Posted by Kacee (Post 31715168)
This would be a massive devaluation of the Premier E+ benefit.

Note that UA can (and probably would) "instant upgrade" Gold and higher to E+ if it were separated out as a cabin, at least at first.

jsloan Nov 8, 2019 8:37 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715217)
Right now there is nothing in the fare rules about Economy Plus

But there is, at least in the NYC-CHI fare I looked at yesterday:


NOTE - THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS INFORMATIONAL AND NOT
VALIDATED FOR AUTOPRICING.
ECONOMY PLUS OW/RT
APPLICATION
CLASS OF SERVICE
THESE FARES APPLY FOR ECONOMY CLASS SERVICE.
TYPES OF TRANSPORTATION
THIS RULE GOVERNS ONE-WAY AND ROUND-TRIP FARES.
FARES GOVERNED BY THIS RULE CAN BE USED TO CREATE
ONE-WAY/ROUND-TRIP/CIRCLE-TRIP/OPEN-JAW JOURNEYS.
CAPACITY LIMITATIONS
SEATS ARE LIMITED.

findark Nov 8, 2019 8:42 am

Ah, I definitely missed that. Regardless, I think things are probably in flux right now, but I agree that's pretty key.

But e.g. buying one for travel in 2Q20 and expecting it to credit as B class to a non-UA program might be a bit rich.

MSPeconomist Nov 8, 2019 8:44 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715110)
(Reposting as a new topic since I think this is big news - props to jsloan for originally catching on to this in https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unit...e-classes.html)

Summary
United filed a bunch of fares on domestic routes on Monday morning which represent the ability to purchase Economy Plus at booking as part of the ticket class. This was done with no announcement and this fact has not yet been advertised on the United website, so I'm still calling this "unconfirmed" but you can book these fares right now if you know how to search for them. They are priced as a fixed differential to Economy (so they are probably more or less than a specific E+ on a specific flight, and it can be worth pricing both ways, although I generally expect the ticket-at-booking solution to be a little more expensive) and book into B class, and so are eligible for 150% PQM (travel by 31 December) and Instant Upgrades for elites (for now, anyway). These have been filed in select domestic markets only, and it is unknown whether UA will tweak the system or otherwise change the conditions prior to officially announcing this. They could also drop these fares as silently as they introduced them -- hence "unconfirmed" at this point :)

Mechanics
It looks like United is preparing to sell Economy Plus as a separate class of service rather than a seat selection fee. This is similar to the way Delta sells its Comfort Plus seats -- instead of paying a fee to choose a seat in Comfort Plus, they treat it as a separate class of service and you can purchase a ticket in Comfort Plus class (W or S booking codes) or upgrade to Comfort Plus via normal upgrade means (DL Plat and DL Diamond get currently last-seat-available instant upgrades to C+ on non-Basic Economy fares). On Monday 4 November, UA introduced a new set of fares into select domestic markets for this purpose (as of writing, I see them on LAX-ORD, EWR-ORD, SFO-EWR, LAX-EWR, but not e.g. SFO-IAD) which functionally allow you to purchase a ticket which "includes" Economy Plus seating as part of the tariff.

These tickets are filed as a Premium Economy type fare on the backend, but they will book into B class and therefore always into the Economy cabin. They seem to be piggy-backing on the code which allows true Premium Economy (O/A/R fares) which delegate to B class on non-equipped routes to choose Economy Plus seats for free. As of right now, there is no published policy about these fares, but they are live and can be booked. As a B class fare, they earn 150% PQM and are instant-upgrade eligible, in addition to allowing a Silver or non-elite to choose any Economy Plus seat free of charge. I would exercise caution when booking a fare like this right now since there is no policy or announcement, which means any of these features could change without notice and without any compensation ("hey I read findark's article on FlyerTalk" is not going to get you far when arguing for a refund).

Pricing
These fares are filed as fixed-differential fares, usually down to K (so there is no differential to G). Each fare carries the standard dual-inventory check with its secondary code. The net effect is that the "Economy Plus fare" (B) is always available at a fixed difference to the current lowest Economy price, just like Basic Economy and First Class fares (prime inventory allowing). Despite being filed as Premium Economy type fares (ZZP), they are filed in parallel with true domestic PE fares for p.s. routes and carry a different branded fare designator of 'P' (in seventh position) -- true domestic differential PE fares are type 'O'. Here is an example of the W4/Q fare family filed on SFO to EWR illustrating the pricing (lowest P added in for contrast):

Code:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cxr    Basis      BC  Cbn    Price  Tp  AP  Min  Max  Days    Rf 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 UA  WAA4AQBN      N  Y    $280.00  OW  14                      N
 UA  WAA4AQDN      W  Y    $315.00  OW  14                      N
 UA  WAA4AQPN      B  Y    $444.00  OW  14                      N
 UA  WAA4AQON      A  W    $514.00  OW  14                      N
..
 UA  VAP30UPN      P  J    $694.00  OW  30                      N

As a typical example, the base of the fare family is WAA4AQDN, which will retail for $329.30 a/i.

Basic Economy is available for a difference of ($35), and Economy Plus for $129, while true Premium Economy is an extra $199. Business on p.s. routes remains non-differential with an advertised $708.30 price for P fares.

How to Book
Right now, United has not announced or otherwise surfaced these fares. However, they are currently an option for booking if for whatever reason you want the upgrade priority, extra PQM, or E+ access for the price. You can price one on united.com by doing an Advanced Search for B class fares -- this will pretty much always be the least expensive B fare. Note that while these will confirm into B inventory, like any differential fare the price is dependent on the lower secondary inventory check and they are not refundable or other things you might associate with a "traditional" B fare. Note that these are only in some domestic markets, so if you don't see any discount B fares when doing your search, your market is probably not valid yet. And finally, a repeat of my caution -- UA has simply published some fares, not made a press release, so any of this is subject to change without notice even if you have already purchased one of these fares!

Correction to the OP: DL DMs and PMs do *not* get last seat availability for instant upgrades to C+ even on domestic routes. DL C+ "upgrades" are inventory controlled, although these supposed "upgrades" can be confirmed at the time of ticket purchase by DMs and PMs not on basic economy fares if the appropriate inventory bucket is available.

Also, with purchased C+ being dual inventory fares having underlying coach fare class codes, we don't know whether DL gives domestic FC upgrade priority to them, nor is there published information regarding whether purchasing a C+ of PS (premium economy) fare gives priority for instrument supported upgrades on longhaul international routes.

John Aldeborgh Nov 8, 2019 8:46 am

Not a surprise, it's just more market segmentation used as a tactic to increase pricing, it's text book. There will be fewer and fewer seats at lower prices but 25 flavors of upgrades at progressively higher prices but it will be marketed as offering customers more ways to save money. Loyalty is increasingly in name only, profits trump loyalty with the current United management.

findark Nov 8, 2019 8:47 am


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 31715276)
Correction to the OP: DL DMs and PMs do *not* get last seat availability for instant upgrades to C+ even on domestic routes. DL C+ "upgrades" are inventory controlled, although these supposed "upgrades" can be confirmed at the time of ticket purchase by DMs and PMs not on basic economy fares if the appropriate inventory bucket is available.

I'm not aware of any reports of SU<W on the DL forum that exceed the background rate of weird computer glitches, but if I'm missing something please let me know. I know DL does not advertise last-seat, but IME so far it has been for all practical purposes :)

Kacee Nov 8, 2019 8:48 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715217)
Note that UA can (and probably would) "instant upgrade" Gold and higher to E+ if it were separated out as a cabin, at least at first.

Even if you grant some kind of upgrade benefit, it's still a big devaluation. The current UA approach offers way more convenience and flexibility than how DL handles C+.

Originally Posted by John Aldeborgh (Post 31715287)
Not a surprise

At this point, I won't be surprised by anything UA does to further devalue MP.

mduell Nov 8, 2019 8:57 am

I'm kind of surprised UA would do this as a replacement for E+ upsells since it would eliminate their ability to price different E+ seats differently without a lot of fares.

goalie Nov 8, 2019 8:58 am


Originally Posted by Kacee (Post 31715168)
This would be a massive devaluation of the Premier E+ benefit.

Coming right on the heels of a massive increase in the qualification requirements.

There's been lots of speculation about various ways UA may hose MMs and this would certainly be one.

This :mad:


Originally Posted by Kacee (Post 31715294)
...At this point, I won't be surprised by anything UA does to further devalue MP.

And this :mad:

Kmxu Nov 8, 2019 9:06 am

This will be announced in the next few hours, I guess. It is Friday today. :(
The seat map on CRJ55 E+ section has "purple" Premium color, which is one of the indicators for rolling out this E+ fare(s).
This is the beginning of the end of free E+ selection for UA Premier members. I wish that I could be wrong on this.

IAH-OIL-TRASH Nov 8, 2019 9:06 am

I wonder if UA is really just making it easier for those non-status business travelers (or Silvers who want good seats at booking) to get into E+ without the extra step of buying it. Some companies dictate coach fares and put the purchase (separately) of E+ on the traveler.

Vaguely similar to when CO renamed First "BusinessFirst" and marketed it as business to circumvent "we'll pay for int'l business, but not first" scheme.

There will be by-products - fewer seats for Premiers to choose from if they book late. I know a marketing lady who flies quarterly form IAH to NY/PA. She's usually a SIlver, books relatively late and tells me she usually gets crappy leftover E+ seats or is in E-. She'd be all over this.

Repooc17 Nov 8, 2019 9:20 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715217)
Note that UA can (and probably would) "instant upgrade" Gold and higher to E+ if it were separated out as a cabin, at least at first.

This, it would be a little bit of annoyance, as Delta does not confirm C+ until after booking, but it's essentially the same process as it is now, maybe a few minutes more for confirmation.

Delta only provides free C+ at (ummm...after) booking for Plat status and higher; UA is giving it to Gold and above.

JimInOhio Nov 8, 2019 9:25 am


Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH (Post 31715361)
I wonder if UA is really just making it easier for those non-status business travelers (or Silvers who want good seats at booking) to get into E+ without the extra step of buying it. Some companies dictate coach fares and put the purchase (separately) of E+ on the traveler.

Vaguely similar to when CO renamed First "BusinessFirst" and marketed it as business to circumvent "we'll pay for int'l business, but not first" scheme.

There will be by-products - fewer seats for Premiers to choose from if they book late. I know a marketing lady who flies quarterly form IAH to NY/PA. She's usually a SIlver, books relatively late and tells me she usually gets crappy leftover E+ seats or is in E-. She'd be all over this.

^^ This. Yes, I think the motivation is to allow business flyers with GM or Silver status a way to get into E+ without running afoul of their corporate travel departments. If nothing else, it shows you how bad UA must think their own E- really is.

jsloan Nov 8, 2019 9:27 am


Originally Posted by Kmxu (Post 31715360)
This is the beginning of the end of free E+ selection for UA Premier members. I wish that I could be wrong on this.

I think you are wrong on this. Even DL, with their much smaller C+ cabins, provides free C+ to their premier members. UA knows they have to fill the E+ seats somehow, and giving them to Premier members is a low-cost way to do that.

I'm not saying that they won't make it more complicated and cumbersome -- I think they will. And if they copy DL, and make Gold members wait for E+ seats -- to me, that's a huge downgrade, as I'm not willing to risk having to sit in E- on a US airline for any significant length of time.

UA gets most of my business because the all-in cost is lower, once I include the cost of seating on another airline. If UA is also going to charge me for seating, they will win much less of my business.

lhrsfo Nov 8, 2019 9:28 am

If they remove E+ from Gold, then I'm kind of glad that they devalued the program - it just confirms my view that I'm done with UA after I've used the instruments I earned for 2020.

MSPeconomist Nov 8, 2019 9:30 am


Originally Posted by Repooc17 (Post 31715415)
This, it would be a little bit of annoyance, as Delta does not confirm C+ until after booking, but it's essentially the same process as it is now, maybe a few minutes more for confirmation.

Delta only provides free C+ at (ummm...after) booking for Plat status and higher; UA is giving it to Gold and above.

On DL, you can see C+ "upgrade" availability at the time of booking by clicking when logged in as a DM/PM. The "upgrade" clears after ticketing is complete, but this is within the 24 hour cancel period, so getting the confirmation after booking has no practical consequence. [DL extends the free "24 hour" cancel privilege even to tickets purchased on the day of departure.]

DL also tends to block two bulkhead C+ seats for special needs passengers. AFAIK these seats look occupied on the DL seat maps (but show as blocked on EF), so this would be one way that DL doesn't give last seat availability to DM/PM without it being very obvious. Of course the number is seats held back will depend on aircraft type, route, day of week, time of day, etc. just as it does for free elite FC upgrades.

findark Nov 8, 2019 9:35 am


Originally Posted by JimInOhio (Post 31715440)
^^ This. Yes, I think the motivation is to allow business flyers with GM or Silver status a way to get into E+ without running afoul of their corporate travel departments. If nothing else, it shows you how bad UA must think their own E- really is.

I'm not aware of any miserly corporate travel departments that permit DL C+ but not UA E+.

JimInOhio Nov 8, 2019 9:40 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715479)
I'm not aware of any miserly corporate travel departments that permit DL C+ but not UA E+.

Nor am I. Our miserly travel people don't permit separate "seat upgrade" charges on either DL or UA.

dilanesp Nov 8, 2019 9:41 am


Originally Posted by JimInOhio (Post 31715440)
^^ This. Yes, I think the motivation is to allow business flyers with GM or Silver status a way to get into E+ without running afoul of their corporate travel departments. If nothing else, it shows you how bad UA must think their own E- really is.

E- isn't bad. It's standard legacy carrier Economy. Perhaps a bit worse than DL and a bit better than AA.

But yes, any business traveler working on the plane is going to at least want an extra legroom seat.

Sykes Nov 8, 2019 9:45 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715479)
I'm not aware of any miserly corporate travel departments that permit DL C+ but not UA E+.

We're actually the opposite. Because of our contract with United, we allow UA E+ but not DL C+ (primarily as a way to encourage travelers to book UA). This change will make life a lot easier for our travelers because they'll be able to search for Premium Economy in our corporate travel booking system and book straight into Economy Plus. Previously they had to purchase Economy in our booking system then upgrade to Economy Plus on united.com afterwards (because the system couldn't handle paid seat fees). Many employees still tried to search for Premium Economy in the booking system and ended up with almost no UA results for domestic itineraries (but tons of DL results).

I'm not convinced that this portends a devaluation. I think it's just bundling E+ with the fare, and if that's the case it's a good thing.

IAH-OIL-TRASH Nov 8, 2019 9:47 am


Originally Posted by dilanesp (Post 31715514)
E- isn't bad. It's standard legacy carrier...

I guess that depends on what year you start "legacy". Noone is going to tell me UA's current average E- coach pitch is the same as it was 20 years ago. And no one is goin to tell me 10-across on some planes is "legacy".

drewguy Nov 8, 2019 9:50 am


Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH (Post 31715361)
I wonder if UA is really just making it easier for those non-status business travelers (or Silvers who want good seats at booking) to get into E+ without the extra step of buying it. Some companies dictate coach fares and put the purchase (separately) of E+ on the traveler.

It has a feel of that to me as well . . . it's always struck me as a bit odd that an economy pax who purchases a Y or B fare doesn't get a 'free" E+ seat with that ticket if they're not elite. Seems like the least they could do (especially with a "free" upgrade). Why wouldn't you want to appeal to high-fare economy pax by throwing in E+?

zombietooth Nov 8, 2019 9:53 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715479)
I'm not aware of any miserly corporate travel departments that permit DL C+ but not UA E+.

Yeah, I don't buy that explanation.

In addition, removing the seat quality pricing discrimination likely means higher average sale price.

Put me in the camp that thinks MM benefits are about to go "bye, bye!".

fatlasercat Nov 8, 2019 10:03 am

This could also be bad for SDC. I always do it based on seatmap. But if it works the same way as for first upgrades, you'd be kicked back to E- and can just hope for an upgrade.

ctownflyer Nov 8, 2019 10:03 am


Originally Posted by zombietooth (Post 31715564)
Put me in the camp that thinks MM benefits are about to go "bye, bye!".

Well UA does have it out for lifetime members, so this makes sense.

1353513636 Nov 8, 2019 10:05 am

I don't think they need to remove E+ from Golds to offer this....more concerning to one's ability to get E+ is the tiny E+ cabins on the new 787 retrofits. I am happy about this as they were leaving money on the table with the old system, for example, I'm allowed to book PE on transcons but not allowed to pay for premium seats....but most flights on UA didn't have PE so I was stuck in E-.

I'd even buy these out of my own pocket if I could get an E+ seat at booking and mileage credit for a B fare to a foreign program.

cesco.g Nov 8, 2019 10:12 am

Is the DL C+ system also applied to international/overseas tickets?
If so, I imagine such a rollout could affect overseas reservations eventually as well .....

findark Nov 8, 2019 10:18 am


Originally Posted by cesco.g (Post 31715661)
Is the DL C+ system also applied to international/overseas tickets?
If so, I imagine such a rollout could affect overseas reservations eventually as well .....

Yes, same rules for international flights.

zombietooth Nov 8, 2019 10:18 am


Originally Posted by 1353513636 (Post 31715622)
I don't think they need to remove E+ from Golds to offer this....more concerning to one's ability to get E+ is the tiny E+ cabins on the new 787 retrofits. I am happy about this as they were leaving money on the table with the old system, for example, I'm allowed to book PE on transcons but not allowed to pay for premium seats....but most flights on UA didn't have PE so I was stuck in E-.

I'd even buy these out of my own pocket if I could get an E+ seat at booking and mileage credit for a B fare to a foreign program.

Let's assume that 50% of business flyers are in the same situation as you, then this change would mean that there would be a huge increase in the percentage of "sold" E+ seats because previously unbookable seats now fit into corporate criteria for "economy" travel. This should result in an average price increase, and thus more revenue, for UA and decreased availability of "free" E+ for elites, no?

MSPeconomist Nov 8, 2019 10:27 am


Originally Posted by findark (Post 31715676)
Yes, same rules for international flights.

Generally yes, but some DL widebody international aircraft currently have premium economy but not C+.

Also, IIRC southern South America flights had been treated differently and continuing to permit C+ access by paying just the seat fee, with elites being able to pick these seats themselves since C+ wasn't treated as a separate cabin class on these routes. I don't know whether this has changed recently to mirror how C+ is handled on other routes.

IAH-OIL-TRASH Nov 8, 2019 10:32 am


Originally Posted by zombietooth (Post 31715677)
...This should result in an average price increase, and thus more revenue, for UA and decreased availability of "free" E+ for elites, no?

Yes. Some business travelers will now be able to book economy fares that include E+ seats that they would not normally occupy. It will affect some who book the cheaper (non-BE) fares and want the free E+ due to shrinking availability..

All we know is that E+ is potentially being bundled w/ some fares. UA hasn't gurgled anything about changes to free E+ selection - that is all speculation. The only real impact that can be discerned from the bundling at this point is probably less inventory of E+ seats for free.

jasonp622 Nov 8, 2019 10:39 am


Originally Posted by lhrsfo (Post 31715453)
If they remove E+ from Gold, then I'm kind of glad that they devalued the program - it just confirms my view that I'm done with UA after I've used the instruments I earned for 2020.

If true, i will not go to extra lengths to get to MM next year.

EWR764 Nov 8, 2019 10:48 am

This is CLEARLY what's coming (E+ as a separate booking class)... it's painfully obvious. We'll see how UA handles the E+ seating benefit for elites.

drewguy Nov 8, 2019 11:39 am

Maybe the most important question is "how far in advance would United tell us that the E+ benefit is going to become more restrictive?" (whether Golds lose at-booking, or other reductions).

Collierkr Nov 8, 2019 11:41 am


Originally Posted by zombietooth (Post 31715677)
Let's assume that 50% of business flyers are in the same situation as you, then this change would mean that there would be a huge increase in the percentage of "sold" E+ seats because previously unbookable seats now fit into corporate criteria for "economy" travel. This should result in an average price increase, and thus more revenue, for UA and decreased availability of "free" E+ for elites, no?

Totally agree. While this will piss off a bunch of frequent flyers, it is a brilliant revenue move.

dshafiee Nov 8, 2019 11:47 am

Delta C+ and AA MCE
 
Wonder if UA will start giving drinks like AA/DL in these rows now. DL also does better snacks in C+.

milepig Nov 8, 2019 11:53 am


Originally Posted by lhrsfo (Post 31715453)
If they remove E+ from Gold, then I'm kind of glad that they devalued the program - it just confirms my view that I'm done with UA after I've used the instruments I earned for 2020.

Yep - that sound you hear is just one more nail being pounded into the coffin.


Originally Posted by dilanesp (Post 31715514)
E- isn't bad. It's standard legacy carrier Economy. Perhaps a bit worse than DL and a bit better than AA.

But yes, any business traveler working on the plane is going to at least want an extra legroom seat.

Um, I'm guessing you're not 6'5" - E- in torture for me.


Originally Posted by jasonp622 (Post 31715773)
If true, i will not go to extra lengths to get to MM next year.

In spades. What have I done wrong that UA hates me so much. I'm a decades-long loyal traveler, having flown nothing by UA or their partners. They can thank be for being a loyal 1K customer, but every action they take says otherwise.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.