![]() |
Originally Posted by Aussienarelle
(Post 30978432)
Sorry you had that experience and when this happens to me, which unfortunately it does such that although I like the bulkhead and exit rows I now select the row behind or in front, I now just keep quiet as I do not wish to be removed from the plane.
|
Originally Posted by seanp7
(Post 30978426)
Re-read the OP. The laptop bag did not fit under the seat in front of her.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 30978367)
Complaining to UA post-flight is fine. "Standing up" to the FA is likely to get you booted off the aircraft. And once that happens, your complaint will typically get zero traction, because the airline will back the crew.
Really, this does not strike me as a grave injustice worthy of the amount of mental energy you are apparently spending on it. |
Conditioning us to fight for OH bin space via checked bag fees is the turning point in air travel, IMO. It made flying a competition with fellow passengers, and led to BG number mattering. It’s too late now, because we are so conditioned to compete that even marking checked bags free again wouldn’t help. OP, my strategy with OH space is to follow FA instructions and flow with it. It’s a war that can’t really be won, even if you’re in the right. |
Originally Posted by chavala
(Post 30978512)
I respectively disagree with you Kacee. I'm willing to bet this sort of thing hardly ever happens to you (assuming you're a man). It happens to women ALL THE TIME. Some of us are getting really sick of it (and that is putting it mildly!).
|
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 30978506)
I read the OP, and said as much in my initial post...
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 30978563)
I think it happens to all of us who fly frequently, in various degrees. So yes, I have absolutely been in situations where FAs have pulled similar nonsense on me. Onboard the aircraft is really not a smart place to be asserting your rights. Especially not when the issue has already been resolved in your favor (which is a point that people seem to be missing here).
Obviously the OP is still upset about this. (I'm still seething over the (male) FA who tapped me on the head with a rolled up magazine a few months ago, so I completely understand). I believe it's time to assert our rights no matter where we are. |
Originally Posted by chavala
(Post 30978590)
I believe it's time to assert our rights no matter where we are.
The risk / reward ratio just seems way out of whack here. |
Originally Posted by chavala
(Post 30978590)
The FA getting in the last sentence with "You wanna try me?" as if he's Clint Eastwood does not sound "resolved" to me. It's a threat, plain and simple.
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 30978608)
If you feel strongly enough about this issue to risk arrest, that's your choice. Personally, I am content to let small people have their "victories" when all it costs me is loss of face -- in an environment where I'll likely never see any of those people again.
The risk / reward ratio just seems way out of whack here. |
Originally Posted by prometa
(Post 30978538)
Conditioning us to fight for OH bin space via checked bag fees is the turning point in air travel, IMO. It made flying a competition with fellow passengers, and led to BG number mattering. It’s too late now, because we are so conditioned to compete that even marking checked bags free again wouldn’t help. OP, my strategy with OH space is to follow FA instructions and flow with it. It’s a war that can’t really be won, even if you’re in the right. It's not uncommon to find a totally empty bin on a fairly full B737 flight in Japan, so to me it feels like a US problem (Maybe EU too? never flown there). |
Originally Posted by chavala
(Post 30978590)
The FA getting in the last sentence with "You wanna try me?" as if he's Clint Eastwood does not sound "resolved" to me. It's a threat, plain and simple.
Obviously the OP is still upset about this. (I'm still seething over the (male) FA who tapped me on the head with a rolled up magazine a few months ago, so I completely understand). I believe it's time to assert our rights no matter where we are. |
Originally Posted by pindi
(Post 30978620)
I just hate being taken advantage of or being bullied or being threatened - especially when I know I am right. It is a matter of standing up for what is right. Once again, if I had the luxury of delaying my arrival at home, I absolutely would have taken the risk of being deplaned.
Personally, I think you made a prudent decision, and I wouldn't beat myself up for it. In life, you often need to pick your battles; this isn't one I would have picked. In my opinion, this is something best handled after-the-fact by complaining to UA, which it seems like you've done. |
There's a recent BA thread with a similar scenario.
And it's equally disgusting. Some bring half their belongings AND the kitchen sink onboard and expect overhead space, and believe it's fair the single laptop bag of another passenger be displaced. |
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 30978388)
Not if you then put that item, which would fit into your personal space under the seat in front of you, into the shared overhead space. At best, you're no more courteous than anyone else who follows the rules. A backpack and a full-size carry-on take up a surprisingly similar amount of usable space in the overhead, unless there happens to be another passenger who is also putting a backpack up and they can fit atop one another.
So a One-bagger like myself (personal item or less size) takes 1530 cubic inches of overhead space, while the average flyer travels with 1,530 Cubic inches + 2,272 Cubic inches = 3,802 Cubic Inches. When I'm standing in the boarding lane, look around and realize I'm carrying ~60% LESS carry-on baggage than everyone else, I don't feel particularly morally obligated to accommodate their extra bags at the cost of my legroom. Call me selfish, but again... I'm already taking at LEAST 33% less overhead than nearly everyone else... and realistically closer to 60-70% less based on my typical loadout. *For those carrying multiple bags, I agree 1 should be stored underseat where feasible. |
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 30978608)
If you feel strongly enough about this issue to risk arrest, that's your choice. Personally, I am content to let small people have their "victories" when all it costs me is loss of face -- in an environment where I'll likely never see any of those people again.
The risk / reward ratio just seems way out of whack here.
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 30978661)
You weren't just risking being deplaned. You would have risked being arrested and jailed for interfering with a flight crew. You were right. But would it have been worth the cost to prove it?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:21 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.