MP Booking Engine Insists on Dangerously Tight Connection
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,746
MP Booking Engine Insists on Dangerously Tight Connection
I'm looking to fly from SFO to LHR using miles.
At the 30K level for the day I want, it offers me a connection via LAX with a 35 minute connection time to the once a day LAX-LHR flight. From my experience, delays on late afternoon flights from SFO to LAX are very common. So, a pretty good chance of a misconnect and an overnight at LAX.
Why? Anyone who knows what they are doing would never book an unprotected connection like this. There are enough flights from SFO to LAX that they could offer this with a safer connection time.
At the 30K level for the day I want, it offers me a connection via LAX with a 35 minute connection time to the once a day LAX-LHR flight. From my experience, delays on late afternoon flights from SFO to LAX are very common. So, a pretty good chance of a misconnect and an overnight at LAX.
Why? Anyone who knows what they are doing would never book an unprotected connection like this. There are enough flights from SFO to LAX that they could offer this with a safer connection time.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406
Because it's a legal connection (although, I agree, it'd be silly to book it), and that particular SFO-LAX flight is less loaded. That's it.
#3
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SAN
Programs: 1K (since 2008), *G (since 1990), 1MM
Posts: 3,219
If you are booking with a large enough lead time, when this happened to me I waited for the first (of many) schedule changes and asked them to move me to an earlier domestic flight. In the main I have found CS agents very reasonable on this issue.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,746
The flight immediately before the SFO-LAX flight with the tight connection shows award space available at the same level as the tight connection flight if I search SFO to LAX.
#5
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
If it is not offered as an option then book the tighter connection and then call to (in first 24 hours) to change to the earlier connection -- if all UA, the agents can do that, first need to find one willing.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 6, 2019 at 3:07 pm Reason: merging consecutive posts by same member
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
#7
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
I'm looking to fly from SFO to LHR using miles.
At the 30K level for the day I want, it offers me a connection via LAX with a 35 minute connection time to the once a day LAX-LHR flight. From my experience, delays on late afternoon flights from SFO to LAX are very common. So, a pretty good chance of a misconnect and an overnight at LAX.
Why? Anyone who knows what they are doing would never book an unprotected connection like this. There are enough flights from SFO to LAX that they could offer this with a safer connection time.
At the 30K level for the day I want, it offers me a connection via LAX with a 35 minute connection time to the once a day LAX-LHR flight. From my experience, delays on late afternoon flights from SFO to LAX are very common. So, a pretty good chance of a misconnect and an overnight at LAX.
Why? Anyone who knows what they are doing would never book an unprotected connection like this. There are enough flights from SFO to LAX that they could offer this with a safer connection time.
Safe Travels,
James
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406
This is accurate.
#10
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
There have been reports that a change in the first 24 hours on an all UA itin is a possibility, especially in this case of a tight connection, probably will require a supervisor override. If it does not work out you can cancel, penalty free.
veteran LAX<>SO flyers might disagree with that. In the case of any WX issues (including SFO morning fog), these flights can be delayed.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 6, 2019 at 5:07 pm
#11
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Uh... based on what? SFO gets more delays than just about any other airport in the system, and LAX is well known for having traffic jams on the tarmac while they wait for a gate to clear. Even if you do land 25 minutes early -- possible, but not likely -- you could easily spend 20+ minutes waiting for a gate.
In theory, sure. In practice, if it's weather related, you're likely to be restricted to UA metal, or -- if you're lucky -- *A flights with available award space. UA is not going to buy a ticket from BA to send someone on an award, especially if that person doesn't have status. (And, yes, I know what it says in the *A handbook. I also know how UA operates).
One could only hope so! In that case, UA will just rebook OP on the non-stop out of SFO. Any small delay out of SFO can easily justify a rebooking on UA, a * partner or OAL given how close it is to MCT as it is.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406
Seat selection is extremely important to some people for a 10+ hour flight -- but it's more than that. If the flight is oversold, the passenger can be IDB'ed with no compensation.
Likely true provided that it's more than three months out. But not all schedule changes will help -- something that extends the transfer by a few minutes likely won't materially increase the chance of making the flight but also probably won't enable switching to a better connection.
SFO frequently has low ceilings due to fog, and that can really, really mess up operations because SFO is scheduled so close to its maximum fair-weather capacity.
Your options are much more limited as a non-status passenger at an airport, possibly without lounge access, than they are as someone who can wait in the premier CS line, use the premier phone line, and head to the lounge.
I agree; there's no problem at all if the schedule changes. You're replying to a comment where someone suggested that OP call within 24 hours of making the reservation and try to change to the earlier flight without paying a mileage difference.
I agree; there's no problem at all if the schedule changes. You're replying to a comment where someone suggested that OP call within 24 hours of making the reservation and try to change to the earlier flight without paying a mileage difference.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 6, 2019 at 5:35 pm Reason: repaired quote
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406