Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Employee class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2017, 12:15 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: DEN/OGG
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 1,482
Employee class

ORD-FRA UA944 today.
Only 2 paid F and 11 employees on the waiting list.
Hope it’s not a party gang and the FAs stay professional
Plane-is-home is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 1:04 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: STL
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Platinum Pro, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,429
Originally Posted by Plane-is-home
ORD-FRA UA944 today.
Only 2 paid F and 11 employees on the waiting list.
Hope it’s not a party gang and the FAs stay professional
And you know this how? Because I looked at the actual listing and who cleared and it doesn't quite match up with your assessment.

Don't really understand the point of these threads. I've encountered far more situations of revenue customers making a ruckus than I have the so called non-rev flying party.
qukslvr619 is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 2:34 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
In flight now! Hope we get an update on the slightly classist post upon landing.
Silver Fox likes this.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 2:48 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Great title!
LondonElite is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 4:14 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,455
I've heard complaints about this in the past. A couple weeks ago cleared at the gate LHR-EWR into F when it was booked 0/6 and the other 4 pax outside of pilot rest were all EE upgrades -- if I wasn't dissecting the upgrade list, I wouldn't have known the difference beyond the pilot in uniform. I am guessing incidents of rowdy employees partying in F are quite few and far between...
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 4:22 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Programs: DYKWIA, But I'm a "Diamond Guest" UA 1K/2MM
Posts: 2,258
I'd be willing to bet that at least one of the "paid F" seats was actually an air marshal. I've seen at least one on every one of my international flights this year. Many flights had two. Maybe they're there to keep the "party" in check!

It's a good reason for GF to go away. Not that many people actually paying for the seats.
porciuscato is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 5:58 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: Marriott Titanium Elite, UA Silver, AA Gold
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by Plane-is-home
ORD-FRA UA944 today.
Only 2 paid F and 11 employees on the waiting list.
Hope it’s not a party gang and the FAs stay professional
SPLITTERZ is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 6:46 pm
  #8  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Programs: Hyatt Globalist | Jumpseat Platinum
Posts: 546
Originally Posted by qukslvr619
Don't really understand the point of these threads. I've encountered far more situations of revenue customers making a ruckus than I have the so called non-rev flying party.
I've only ever had one non-rev acting poorly. A quick reminder of his status, and a promise of an email to his endorser should the behavior continue, and problem solved. Didn't even need to send the email.

I can't exactly do the same with revenue pax.

Originally Posted by aCavalierInCoach
I am guessing incidents of rowdy employees partying in F are quite few and far between...
Exactly.
codex57 and lincolnjkc like this.
fezzington is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 8:16 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 1,032
OK, I'll bite.

(1) Yes, I have been in this exact situation. Only 2 people at F lounge (including me), when I boarded the other person was in 1A, I was in 1K (744, RIP). Got curious and checked the app, and sure enough, all others were double upgraded.

(2) No, the nonrevs were not disruptive or even anywhere rude, although many of them were extra chatty with the FAs (which was fine, did not interfere with service)

(3) If anyone is wondering why GF is going away...
radiowell is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 9:30 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
Originally Posted by aCavalierInCoach
I am guessing incidents of rowdy employees partying in F are quite few and far between...
I've had some really pleasant NRSA seatmates in long-haul J.

Originally Posted by radiowell
No, the nonrevs were not disruptive or even anywhere rude, although many of them were extra chatty with the FAs (which was fine, did not interfere with service)
This has been my only issue, and then only when it interferes with service to the rest of the cabin (or keeps me awake on an overnight). Had this happen just last week on DL HNL-SLC.
Kacee is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2017, 11:40 am
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: DEN/OGG
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 1,482
Originally Posted by qukslvr619
And you know this how? Because I looked at the actual listing and who cleared and it doesn't quite match up with your assessment.

Don't really understand the point of these threads. I've encountered far more situations of revenue customers making a ruckus than I have the so called non-rev flying party.
i know it because the purser said so and because all the people ultimately ending up in F were on all 3 lists.
But well behaved crowd.
Plane-is-home is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2017, 11:49 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Somewhere in EWR
Programs: UA GS, HH Diamond
Posts: 858
One of the few times I have been with a large number of non-revs was an ORD-EWR flight in the GF seats. I was one of two paying customers and most of the time the six non-revs either hung out in the galley or helped crew the cabin. It was like having eight people serving you and I have to say it was quite nice.
tuolumne, narvik and k.hiramoto like this.
AugustusM is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2017, 12:05 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Originally Posted by Plane-is-home


i know it because the purser said so and because all the people ultimately ending up in F were on all 3 lists.
But well behaved crowd.
It has been proven again and again that just because someone is on all 3 lists does not mean they are an employee.
PBAudit likes this.
Baze is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2017, 1:11 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Originally Posted by Baze
It has been proven again and again that just because someone is on all 3 lists does not mean they are an employee.
But does almost certainly mean they are pass riders.
raehl311 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2017, 1:22 pm
  #15  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,856
Originally Posted by raehl311
But does almost certainly mean they are pass riders.
Except for other cases, like displaced irrop customers when there is no confirmable space.
Baze, narvik, canadiancow and 1 others like this.
WineCountryUA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.