Originally Posted by iflyalexair
(Post 28210186)
It takes 19 minutes on the LIRR from Jamaica Airtrain Station to Penn Station. It's only a few dollars more than the E train.
Part of the difficulty with EWR, as others have mentioned, is if you are not going to take public transit. EWR originating cabs to the city aren't cheap with the trans-Hudson tolls. I live in Brooklyn, and I avoid EWR like the plague. A cab or car service easily runs $80-100, plus the concerns of tunnel traffic make it a risky option. Also, the train connections aren't particularly convenient unless you're going to Penn Station or willing to hop on the PATH to downtown. For me to get to Brooklyn by train from EWR is: Airtrain to NJ Transit to Midtown and a long subway ride to BK or Airtrain to NJ Transit to PATH to shorter subway ride. JFK to Brooklyn is a $35 car service. |
Originally Posted by iflyalexair
(Post 28210186)
It takes 19 minutes on the LIRR from Jamaica Airtrain Station to Penn Station. It's only a few dollars more than the E train.
Part of the difficulty with EWR, as others have mentioned, is if you are not going to take public transit. EWR originating cabs to the city aren't cheap with the trans-Hudson tolls. I live in Brooklyn, and I avoid EWR like the plague. A cab or car service easily runs $80-100, plus the concerns of tunnel traffic make it a risky option. Also, the train connections aren't particularly convenient unless you're going to Penn Station or willing to hop on the PATH to downtown. For me to get to Brooklyn by train from EWR is: Airtrain to NJ Transit to Midtown and a long subway ride to BK or Airtrain to NJ Transit to PATH to shorter subway ride. JFK to Brooklyn is a $35 car service. |
Originally Posted by smxflyer
(Post 28210229)
Likely because the barrier to re-entry is too high. They would need to buy slots again, re-allocate fleet, crew base, terminal space, etc. Don't be surprised if UA if back at JFK at some point.
|
Originally Posted by smxflyer
(Post 28210229)
Likely because the barrier to re-entry is too high. They would need to buy slots again, re-allocate fleet, crew base, terminal space, etc. Don't be surprised if UA if back at JFK at some point.
A return to JFK would be a mistake according to his own admission unless capital costs (including the need for more aircraft) plummet. |
Originally Posted by ysolde
(Post 28210025)
I live in Manhattan (on the UWS). Theoretically, it is easier for me to fly in and out of EWR (geographically closer) than out of JFK. However, I avoid EWR like the Plague. *snip*
|
Originally Posted by minnyfly
(Post 28210259)
Like I said. If that's the reason why a return isn't worth it, which is reasonable, that means JFK was a marginal operation at best on the overall bottom line. That makes his blanket "wrong move" statement very suspicious. If an operation is only worth the capital already placed into it, then it's not lucrative and worthy to be cut.
|
Originally Posted by smxflyer
(Post 28210267)
The JFK operation may not have been profitable, but the knock-on effect was losing NYC, LAX and SFO based HVF, which has reduced profits across the whole network.
|
The "admission" was that JFK was important to big corporate accounts that fly a lot across the network. So, if they lost $10M a year on JFK, but those accounts contributed $100M overall profit across the network, they lost $90M getting out and losing those account.
At this point they probably have to sleep in the bed they've made, since going back to JFK means buying slots, getting real estate , building a polaris lounge, etc. |
Leaving New York’s JFK "Was the Wrong Decision"...
What a coincidence: that's exactly what I said on my UA post-flight survey asking about my p.s. EWR->SFO in March. ;) As a once/twice a year "P" fare customer on this route, I've never run an airline but, esp. coming back to pick up p.s. from Brooklyn or W. Conn., there's no question which terminal is easier and quicker to get to: JFK. And while JFK has some serious traffic issues getting to/from, so can EWR. Once one gets to JFK, the customer experience is infinitely better in so many aspects: signage, check-in, TSA Pre check, distance between TSA or baggage claim and the gate/UC Club, avoiding the hordes of people in poorly designed piers in this mega-plex which EWR is, helpfulness of UA staff, etc., etc. Only Q. I have is: when is UA returning p.s. to JFK?? |
Originally Posted by minnyfly
(Post 28210217)
And why should we believe your assessment?
Originally Posted by minnyfly
(Post 28210217)
AndHere's why we take it with more than a grain of salt:
Originally Posted by minnyfly
(Post 28210217)
I don't care who makes the statement and what it is. I look at the evidence. Executives are paid to lie if they have to.
|
Maybe *A should be told to fly to EWR instead of JFK.
|
Originally Posted by MSYtoJFKagain
(Post 28210261)
I live in Chelsea and feel the same way. Most of my travel out of JFK/LGA is with OPM so I'm in a cab about 90% of the time. Every cab I've taken from EWR has ended up as a hassle.
Originally Posted by ysolde
(Post 28210245)
I live on the UWS, and the last time I flew into EWR, the cab ride home cost me $120, plus tip.
Originally Posted by PaulInTheSky
(Post 28210097)
pay that petty $20USD for the bridge/tunnel fees.
Originally Posted by PaulInTheSky
(Post 28210097)
For Uber/taxi, I'd like to get from LGA/JFK, because there's one less bridge that you have to worry about,
There is one river crossing from any of the three airports to Manhattan. If you're crossing more than one bridge or tunnel you're doing it wrong. |
Can someone here tell me which *A carriers and other partners use EWR and which ones use JFK? Furthermore, are there AC flights to/from LGA?
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 28210396)
You got fleeced by a cab driver. Definitely blame UA for that. :rolleyes:
. It's simply one of the (big) reasons why I choose to avoid EWR: it's expensive, inconvenient, takes forever to get there and back, and, IMO, it's a pit of an airport. |
Originally Posted by deskover54
(Post 28209836)
It's very insightful, but still leaves me scratching my head. I got to New York a lot, and it's way easier to get into the city from EWR than JFK. JFK is 1:10 on the train. EWR is like 40 mins on the NJ Transit.
But the LIRR offers much more frequent service than NJ Transit, especially on the weekends and at off hours. I almost never bother checking the LIRR schedule, I know there will always be a train in 10-15 minutes. With NJT, it can be 40+ minutes between trains sometimes. I used to be a die-hard CO traveler, and as an Upper West Side resident, it wasn't hard to justify that EWR wasn't really that bad to get to. But there are just more (reasonable) options to get to/from JFK. It's easy to avoid the tolls, especially at off-hours. Even taxis are fine in a pinch, in either direction. Nobody in their right mind should take a taxi to Manhattan from EWR! And good luck finding one to take you there from Manhattan... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.