FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   United Pilot Q & A thread (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1817752-united-pilot-q-thread.html)

eng3 Jul 30, 2024 11:45 am


Originally Posted by LarryJ (Post 36416323)
I doubt the FA was talking about a physical alarm.

Maybe I don't quite understand other types of "alarms". I heard "set off" so it sounded physical vs saying something is "alarming"
OR does UA have strict thresholds that they define as "alarms" for passenger behavior and response?

lincolnjkc Jul 30, 2024 12:37 pm


Originally Posted by eng3 (Post 36416817)
Maybe I don't quite understand other types of "alarms". I heard "set off" so it sounded physical vs saying something is "alarming"
OR does UA have strict thresholds that they define as "alarms" for passenger behavior and response?

"set of (mental) alarms"

E.g. something the passenger did or said made an alarm bell (figurative) ring in the FA's head.

As the extreme but aviation example if I overheard a passenger, or anyone really, saying "I have a bomb" is likely to set off alarms in my head

eng3 Jul 30, 2024 5:24 pm


Originally Posted by lincolnjkc (Post 36416955)
"set of (mental) alarms"

E.g. something the passenger did or said made an alarm bell (figurative) ring in the FA's head.

As the extreme but aviation example if I overheard a passenger, or anyone really, saying "I have a bomb" is likely to set off alarms in my head

Sure, there are mental alarms, but only I know about my mental alarm thresholds as they are inside my head. I wouldnt reference my own mental alarm when talking to someone else.
I heard "They set off the alarm" twice. If someone said that to me, my first question would be "the alarm? which alarm??"
And that's what I was asking here.
The only way I can think of where that would make sense is if FA's received some training or memo or previous conversation where they established the "alarm" nomenclature. Maybe that's something common in commercial aviation?

LaserSailor Jul 30, 2024 5:40 pm


Originally Posted by LarryJ (Post 36416323)
I doubt the FA was talking about a physical alarm.

the rumble of hoof beats portends the arriving zebra stampede.

seriously though,when on an over water route, and you hear

Whoop whoop…..Terrain, Pull up!

does it get confusing as there is obviously no terrain?

LarryJ Jul 30, 2024 8:04 pm


Originally Posted by LaserSailor (Post 36417568)
seriously though,when on an over water route, and you hear
Whoop whoop…..Terrain, Pull up!
does it get confusing as there is obviously no terrain?

Nuisance GPWS alerts happen very infrequently. Even less, now, with the more advanced systems. It gets your attention, and you immediately verify your status, but that's about it.

A couple of years ago, I was departing one of the upstate New York airports at dawn. Beautiful clear, calm morning. About 80 knots on the the takeoff roll we got a full windshear alert. We rejected the takeoff, and did all the appropriate procedures, even though there was no way there could have been windshear in those conditions. When we reported it to the tower they said they had a windshear alert, too, indicating a strong loss of airspeed. I have no idea what would cause both systems to give a false warning like that.

wxguy Jul 31, 2024 4:38 am


Originally Posted by LarryJ (Post 36417783)
Nuisance GPWS alerts happen very infrequently. Even less, now, with the more advanced systems. It gets your attention, and you immediately verify your status, but that's about it.

A couple of years ago, I was departing one of the upstate New York airports at dawn. Beautiful clear, calm morning. About 80 knots on the the takeoff roll we got a full windshear alert. We rejected the takeoff, and did all the appropriate procedures, even though there was no way there could have been windshear in those conditions. When we reported it to the tower they said they had a windshear alert, too, indicating a strong loss of airspeed. I have no idea what would cause both systems to give a false warning like that.

If it was BUF, it's possible you encountered a "lake breeze front." Invisible, and can happen on otherwise beautiful days. Eventually convection may occur. But early in the life-cycle, it can be something the GPWS or TDWR and your on-board sensor will see, but you won't. I think your action was well-warranted.

eng3 Jul 31, 2024 5:50 am


Originally Posted by LarryJ (Post 36417783)
Nuisance GPWS alerts happen very infrequently. Even less, now, with the more advanced systems. It gets your attention, and you immediately verify your status, but that's about it.

A couple of years ago, I was departing one of the upstate New York airports at dawn. Beautiful clear, calm morning. About 80 knots on the the takeoff roll we got a full windshear alert. We rejected the takeoff, and did all the appropriate procedures, even though there was no way there could have been windshear in those conditions. When we reported it to the tower they said they had a windshear alert, too, indicating a strong loss of airspeed. I have no idea what would cause both systems to give a false warning like that.

So you received a windshear alert from the plane (assuming based instruments on the plane) and the airport reported the same (assuming based on instruments at the field). If I see something from two completely separate instruments like this, I'd conclude that there was windshear.

As for GPWS, I'd imagine this would be more of a problem for private aviation (assuming they have the system) or military as they might need to land at an airport that isn't in the database. Or a rarely used airport that has an error. I'd assume if a major airport started throwing false alarms, the mfr would get lots of complaints.

LarryJ Jul 31, 2024 6:23 pm


Originally Posted by wxguy (Post 36418361)
If it was BUF, it's possible you encountered a "lake breeze front."

It was ROC.


Originally Posted by eng3 (Post 36418469)
If I see something from two completely separate instruments like this, I'd conclude that there was windshear.

Both systems use the same technology to detect windshear, Doppler radar. Something was triggering both systems. The Tower said that they occasionally get those false alerts right at sunrise.

alenguy Jul 31, 2024 8:05 pm

Two questions:

First, I have an upcoming flight from HNL-SFO in a little under two weeks and the (admittedly very preliminary) weather models right now are showing either a hurricane or the leftovers of a hurricane directly in the normal flight path. From a pilot or dispatcher perspective, would United fly around the entire system to avoid bumps (probably adding between 30 and 60 minutes to the regular flight time) or would they instead go through (or over) it with the justification that it's just a big rain storm (assuming that it's something like a depression by that point) that poses no real threat to the flight even if it's bumpy? And who makes this call - the pilot or the dispatcher?

Second, for the pilots in the room, as a nervous flyer it makes me feel a lot better to talk to the pilots prior to the flight to ask about expected turbulence and related issues such as weather. Assuming that there's not a huge rush to turn the plane around, do y'all mind a visit to the flight deck from passengers like me before the flight or is this an annoyance to you?

Mahalo for the responses!

United747 Jul 31, 2024 8:31 pm


Originally Posted by alenguy (Post 36420338)
Two questions:

First, I have an upcoming flight from HNL-SFO in a little under two weeks and the (admittedly very preliminary) weather models right now are showing either a hurricane or the leftovers of a hurricane directly in the normal flight path. From a pilot or dispatcher perspective, would United fly around the entire system to avoid bumps (probably adding between 30 and 60 minutes to the regular flight time) or would they instead go through (or over) it with the justification that it's just a big rain storm (assuming that it's something like a depression by that point) that poses no real threat to the flight even if it's bumpy? And who makes this call - the pilot or the dispatcher?

Second, for the pilots in the room, as a nervous flyer it makes me feel a lot better to talk to the pilots prior to the flight to ask about expected turbulence and related issues such as weather. Assuming that there's not a huge rush to turn the plane around, do y'all mind a visit to the flight deck from passengers like me before the flight or is this an annoyance to you?

Mahalo for the responses!

I’m not a pilot, but for #1, they’ll try to find a way to use it to their advantage (re winds). On HNL-SFO earlier this year, we hit 730mph ground speed (roughly 190mph tailwind).

We left over an hour late and still made it early

COSPILOT Jul 31, 2024 10:34 pm


Originally Posted by alenguy (Post 36420338)
Two questions:

First, I have an upcoming flight from HNL-SFO in a little under two weeks and the (admittedly very preliminary) weather models right now are showing either a hurricane or the leftovers of a hurricane directly in the normal flight path. From a pilot or dispatcher perspective, would United fly around the entire system to avoid bumps (probably adding between 30 and 60 minutes to the regular flight time) or would they instead go through (or over) it with the justification that it's just a big rain storm (assuming that it's something like a depression by that point) that poses no real threat to the flight even if it's bumpy? And who makes this call - the pilot or the dispatcher?

Second, for the pilots in the room, as a nervous flyer it makes me feel a lot better to talk to the pilots prior to the flight to ask about expected turbulence and related issues such as weather. Assuming that there's not a huge rush to turn the plane around, do y'all mind a visit to the flight deck from passengers like me before the flight or is this an annoyance to you?

Mahalo for the responses!

Turbulence between the islands and the mainland is pretty much the norm for a short few minutes, but really no big deal. Enjoy Hawaii, and remember you are flying UA with a great team up front.

LarryJ Aug 1, 2024 7:20 am


Originally Posted by alenguy (Post 36420338)
First, I have an upcoming flight from HNL-SFO in a little under two weeks and the (admittedly very preliminary) weather models right now are showing either a hurricane

It depends on the specifics of the weather conditions at the time of the flight. That can't be predicted two-weeks in advance. It might involve routing around the weather, picking specific altitudes to avoid turbulence, or some combination of the two.


Assuming that there's not a huge rush to turn the plane around, do y'all mind a visit to the flight deck from passengers like me before the flight or is this an annoyance to you?
We welcome visitors of all ages. Just ask the F/A as you board.


RobOnLI Sep 7, 2024 10:03 pm

Question about weight & balance issues.

Just flew east coast to SFO on a Max 9. Front full but coach maybe 50% full (E+ roughly 75%, E- roughly 30-40%). I was in row 21 (because, as usual, I died #3 on the list even with PPs applied. I digress).

Lead FA makes two announcements that everyone needs to be in their assigned seats for W&B issues. I look at the two guys sitting in row 20 wondering what they're doing there as the seat map shows that row totally empty.

Lead FA comes back to my row, looks at me and the standby who cleared into 21C and says I need to move to the last row of the plane and I'll be compensated for my troubles. I start collecting my belongings (not saying a word) and then the lead FA apologizes, realizes I'm 1K and tells the standby pax he needs to move to the back. I told him for the right compensation I'd move - LOL. He was willing to go along but what the "computer" offered was meaningless so I declined.

I mentioned to the lead FA that the two in row 20 were not supposed to be there. He asked them for their original seat assignments. One of the guys said, "They said it was OK for us to be here." That's it. Lead FA walked away. Huh?!?! You can imagine my confusion.

W&B is a finicky metric and the safety of everybody on the plane is in jeopardy. Yet, it's ok for the two who were told it's "ok" to be in that row but the lead FA literally moves a single person on the plane from row 21 to row 39. That makes no sense. How is moving a single body from row 21 to row 39 fixing the W&B? W&B is calculated based on occupied seats as printed on the BP, no? Curious...

-RM

LarryJ Sep 8, 2024 8:24 am

The weight and balance calculations have hard upper and lower limits. It the result is within those limits we are good, if they our outside of them then we are not. It doesn't matter how small the difference between the two, just that the final result is within limits.

It makes little practical difference when the change is that small but we still have to be within the certification limits. There is no +/- margin of error, like a political poll, that is acceptable.

What happens is the load planner in Chicago sends up a message with specific instructions such as "row 7 must be empty" or "more one passenger from row 31 to for 8", etc. I've can't remember ever getting a message about moving to or from the exit row.

In these cases, our final weights message is suppressed until we confirm that the change of seating has been made.

zeus2120 Sep 8, 2024 10:12 am

1.) The other day I flew on a 772 from OGG-SFO. Halfway through the takeoff roll, fuel was spewing (like a lot) from the left fuel jettison tube. It lasted for probably 10-15 seconds but I've never seen it happen before. Once we were probably 100 feet in the air the flow ended. Any particular reason why that would happen? Can't imagine we were carrying a full load of fuel for only a 4.5 hour flight.

2.) On my second flight from SFO-CLE, we landed with what looked to be significant ice build up on the top of the wing. Significant as in 1/2 inch to an inch thick over probably 10 sqft of area, center of the wing (both sides of the plane). Not on any edges or anything. I'm guessing it's from cold soaked fuel, but even in the winter I've never seen so much ice built up on the wing. Does anything in the flight deck alert the crew that ice is building up?

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...49fc2b345.jpeg



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:05 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.