UA 777 PMco BusinessFirst vs Thai 777 Royal Silk
I need to fly back from ICN to NYC on Xmas day.
award ticket only shows either ICN-PEK with CA and UA from PEK to EWR on BusinessFirst for 70k miles OR ICN-LAX on Thai 777 Royal Silk then PS BusinessFirst from LAX-JFK for 80k miles. What are Flyertalker's preferences? |
Originally Posted by bryanlee81
(Post 24014535)
I need to fly back from ICN to NYC on Xmas day.
award ticket only shows either ICN-PEK with CA and UA from PEK to EWR on BusinessFirst for 70k miles OR ICN-LAX on Thai 777 Royal Silk then PS BusinessFirst from LAX-JFK for 80k miles. What are Flyertalker's preferences? 1. Equivalent hard product TG vs. UA. 2. Better service on TG. 3. Avoid PEK connection (most delayed major airport in the world). 4. If your connection's long enough, enjoy the *A lounge at TBIT. Watch also for OZ to open space on OZ202 (A380). |
If it were me, I'd go with the ICN-PEK-EWR route. Benefits:
I don't find TG's Royal Silk to be anything special, especially if that 777 is a 773 and not a 77W (7 across vs. 4 across in J) (can ignore this last part per Kacee's confirmation of 77W) |
I took TG's BKK-ICN-LAX couple times last year and found this option better than United's. TG 77W has much better seats/beds, which all have direct aisle access. You should allow a good transit time in LAX though to move from TB terminal to T7.
|
Kacee hit on all the excellent reasons to choose TG through LAX. The risk of misconnecting in PEK is reason enough to avoid that route.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 24014581)
TG is now flying the 77W on that route. That's the winner as far as I'm concerned.
1. Equivalent hard product TG vs. UA. 2. Better service on TG. 3. Avoid PEK connection (most delayed major airport in the world). 4. If your connection's long enough, enjoy the *A lounge at TBIT. Watch also for OZ to open space on OZ202 (A380). -FlyerBeek |
Originally Posted by FlyerBeek
(Post 24014927)
The *A lounge at TBIT will not be accessible, however, if the OP is connecting onto LAX-JFK.
-FlyerBeek |
Originally Posted by Kingston
(Post 24014969)
Of course it will be. OP is departing on a star alliance flight and is *G.
|
LAX reportedly now DOES allow passengers into any terminal with a BP departing LAX that day; it is a relatively recent change.
But it would require the OP to allow for the time required to leave TBIT and head over to T7 for the flight to JFK. Depending on the layover it might not be worth dealing with the extra TSA bits. |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 24015210)
LAX reportedly now DOES allow passengers into any terminal with a BP departing LAX that day; it is a relatively recent change.
But it would require the OP to allow for the time required to leave TBIT and head over to T7 for the flight to JFK. Depending on the layover it might not be worth dealing with the extra TSA bits. -FlyerBeek |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 24014581)
TG is now flying the 77W on that route. That's the winner as far as I'm concerned.
1. Equivalent hard product TG vs. UA. |
If you're worried about food, TG C food is generally poor, but UA C food ex-PEK is also horrible.
|
Originally Posted by whimike
(Post 24015426)
Disagree here, the TG hard product on the 77W is not even comparable to UA, it is vastly better. It is the same seats used on EY J and EK A380 J. All-aisle access, very private, etc...
IIRC correctly, TG does have better AVOD and the lavs tend to be much nicer than on any UA aircraft. But on the whole I don't think this choice gets made on hard product. And one more thing - the fake wood and purple decor on the TG 77W is unbelievably tacky. |
Chalk me up for a TG vote, hands down.
Purple may be 'tacky', but their soft product is a bunch better, I think their food is much better (especially portion-size) than UA and the cheese plate and wines are much MUCH better than UA (if that matters to you). Flying through PEK (especially if you don't have a visa, which isn't required, but read some reports here with UA and transiting on the mainland), ON UA would be awful - I wouldn't even do it if it saved me 50k miles - UA is that bad in every service level. -jeremy |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 24015897)
I'm familiar with the TG seat, I've flown it on both the 77W and the 380. It has direct aisle access but I find the cushioning less comfortable than either of the UA BF seats. And it's only private if you manage to avoid one of the paired middle seats - those are very similar to the middle seats on an sUA 763 in terms of privacy - i.e., not much at all.
The pmCO BF seats are quite nice and I like them a lot, but I still prefer the TG seats. For some reason I was thinking pmUA BF seats, where there is no comparison. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:44 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.