FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   CPUs improving ? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1453555-cpus-improving.html)

spin88 May 3, 2013 11:04 pm


Originally Posted by mgcsinc (Post 20694836)
Upthread, or in another thread, there was some discussion that I'd like to re-open. People make a lot of cheap corporate Y fares, TOD's, etc., but posts like this about enormous lists -- and there are many such posts -- suggest that part of the problem is good old fashioned swelling of the elite ranks.

I think there's a colorable argument that the merger has permitted people to concentrate more of their travel on UA, and that's part of why people are feeling so much pain in terms of CPU's.

Not just a colorable argument, but I am sure reality. UA projected $800M/yr in revenue synergies from folks keeping their travel on UA (mostly CO folks who got their network filled out flying UA, rather than DL/NW/AS) and I have no doubt they saw them.

So why is revenue performance so bad? UA trails everyone in yield/PRASM growth? Only explanation I can give is that while the number of folks able to hit an upgrade list (silver...) swelled, many folks who were GS/iK and spend lots of money have fled UA. Those who paid more, or were not captive, and therefore able to move have left. Leaving the IAH/EWR/CLE folks stuck with the "new UA" :eek:

limey1K May 6, 2013 7:28 am

Not for me. DEN-ATL today on an ERJ-170. 6F/64Y seats. F is "sold out" with 1 upgraded and the Upgrade list is 37 people long. I'm #6 on a W fare.

aacharya May 6, 2013 7:37 am


Originally Posted by limey1K (Post 20705008)
Not for me. DEN-ATL today on an ERJ-170. 6F/64Y seats. F is "sold out" with 1 upgraded and the Upgrade list is 37 people long. I'm #6 on a W fare.

A few issues with this, both on CPU expectation and choice of plane.

To run an ERJ essentially cross-country is insane.

To expect CPUs with only 6 F seats is also asking a lot.

To run such a small plane when more than half of the flight is Elite is also insane.

limey1K May 6, 2013 7:52 am


Originally Posted by aacharya (Post 20705041)
A few issues with this, both on CPU expectation and choice of plane.

To run an ERJ essentially cross-country is insane.

To expect CPUs with only 6 F seats is also asking a lot.

To run such a small plane when more than half of the flight is Elite is also insane.

Not a lot of choice on the flight choice, I'm afraid. Co-worker is arriving at the same time and needed to book a flight that coordinated arrival times.

I didn't expect a CPU.

Just posting my experience today. Not sure why I bother, really.

tryathlete May 6, 2013 8:00 am

1K not all that nifty anymore
 
I'm starting to realize that unless I use a RPU or GPU, upgrades are pretty much a non-starter anymore. Hub to hub I'm getting nowhere on mainline aircraft. As an EXP on AA I virtually never missed in 2012 during the challenge as a status-matched EXP. last week 319 ORD to DFW, missed one way by one rank (1st on list no availability). Return- 4th. Today 737-800 with 16 seats, 17th on the list.

A few more months of this and going to make the final move to AA.

UA-NYC May 6, 2013 8:22 am


Originally Posted by limey1K (Post 20705112)
Not a lot of choice on the flight choice, I'm afraid. Co-worker is arriving at the same time and needed to book a flight that coordinated arrival times.

I didn't expect a CPU.

Just posting my experience today. Not sure why I bother, really.

Let me try and re-phrase so this sticks - if you want to fly into an OAL hub these days, you should fly the OAL - DL has ~8-9 mainline flights on your route today, UA has 3 RJs. Same goes for CLT, DFW, MSP, etc - the OALs will have the mainline flights at greater frequency; UA will have RJs at lesser frequency.

aacharya May 6, 2013 9:02 am


Originally Posted by limey1K (Post 20705112)
Not a lot of choice on the flight choice, I'm afraid. Co-worker is arriving at the same time and needed to book a flight that coordinated arrival times.

I didn't expect a CPU.

Just posting my experience today. Not sure why I bother, really.

My experience is in my signature. I think it's great to inform others.

bmvaughn May 6, 2013 10:07 am


Originally Posted by aacharya (Post 20705539)
My experience is in my signature. I think it's great to inform others.

How'd you miss one PHL-SEA? US flies that, not UA.

GoAmtrak May 13, 2013 10:52 am

I had a very nice battlefield CPU experience on MSP-SFO (L fare).

F on the 737-700 was booked 10/12 before the upgrade windows. At the GS window, a couple was upgraded and F was booked full. It remained that way until about T-48, when someone changed/canceled and it went to 11/12. The buy-up offer then appeared as follows:

Within booking: $537
OLCI: $429
Kiosk: $429

I was #1 on the waitlist and stayed there, waiting with bated breath for someone else on a higher fare to bump me or for someone to bite on the buy-up. Another thread discussed how the EUA process might run within 3 hours of departure now, whereas it wouldn't before. I was very pleasantly surprised for my upgrade to clear 50 minutes before departure. ^ 14 names were left on the waitlist at boarding (including a few non-revs), so it wasn't the most elite-heavy flight. Still, I considered the upgrade to be quite a bonus.

Moral of the story: Even if F is booked full before nearly anyone gets upgraded at the windows, anything is possible!

demkr May 13, 2013 11:01 am

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B350 Safari/8536.25)


Originally Posted by GoAmtrak
I had a very nice battlefield CPU experience on MSP-SFO (L fare).

F on the 737-700 was booked 10/12 before the upgrade windows. At the GS window, a couple was upgraded and F was booked full. It remained that way until about T-48, when someone changed/canceled and it went to 11/12. The buy-up offer then appeared as follows:

Within booking: $537
OLCI: $429
Kiosk: $429

I was #1 on the waitlist and stayed there, waiting with bated breath for someone else on a higher fare to bump me or for someone to bite on the buy-up. Another thread discussed how the EUA process might run within 3 hours of departure now, whereas it wouldn't before. I was very pleasantly surprised for my upgrade to clear 50 minutes before departure. ^ 14 names were left on the waitlist at boarding (including a few non-revs), so it wasn't the most elite-heavy flight. Still, I considered the upgrade to be quite a bonus.

Moral of the story: Even if F is booked full before nearly anyone gets upgraded at the windows, anything is possible!

Ugh I hate that flight- especially on the 319 which is the normal aircraft for the route. On a regular basis, the upgrade lists run from 30-40 people and the seats sell out before the windows open.

There's typically a "decent" P fare for that route too

aacharya May 13, 2013 11:13 am


Originally Posted by bmvaughn (Post 20705865)
How'd you miss one PHL-SEA? US flies that, not UA.

Fixed. It was PHL-IAD-SEA.


Originally Posted by diditclear (Post 20690839)
Thanks! :)



I am hoping to grow the user base beyond FTers. The initial seed for the vision on how statistics should be collected had to come from here, since this community combines all of the experts who know best the topic. But there is another community of frequent flyers who are not here, who are still interested in keeping such tabs. The blend of both worlds should un-bias the results, at least to some extent, provided we can reach out to them.

A thought - upgrades (yes or no) are easily noted on our activity on united.com - it won't give you information as to 'when', but I would be all in favor of uploading an xls.csv file with my united.com information versus typing in each flight. Then I could possibly note "when" or other information.

All flights with "Z" were upgraded (without using RPU or GPUs) - I removed the UA Express flights.

5/8/2013 United 376-ZG class
Chicago (ORD)-Philadelphia 678 0 678 1,356 678 1
5/7/2013 United 507-G class
Philadelphia-Chicago (ORD) 678 0 678 1,356 678 1
5/7/2013 United 1512-ZG class
Chicago (ORD)-Portland 1,739 0 1,739 3,478 1,739 1
5/7/2013 United 360-ZG class
Portland-Chicago (ORD) 1,739 0 1,739 3,478 1,739 1
5/1/2013 United 816-G class
Washington (IAD)-Seattle 2,306 0 2,306 4,612 2,306 1
5/1/2013 United 1696-ZK class
Seattle-Washington (IAD) 2,306 0 2,306 4,612 2,306 1
4/30/2013 United 1496-G class
San Francisco-New York/Newark 2,565 0 2,565 5,130 2,565 1
4/27/2013 United 722-ZG class
New York/Newark-Los Angeles 2,454 0 2,454 4,908 2,454 1
4/20/2013 United 264-ZG class
Denver-Philadelphia 1,557 0 1,557 3,114 1,557 1
4/19/2013 United 383-ZG class
Honolulu-Denver 3,365 0 3,365 6,730 3,365 1
4/15/2013 United 445-G class
Philadelphia-San Francisco 2,521 0 2,521 5,042 2,521 1
4/15/2013 United 300-ZG class
San Francisco-Honolulu 2,398 0 2,398 4,796 2,398 1
4/3/2013 United 1581-K class
New York/Newark-Seattle 2,401 0 2,401 4,802 2,401 1
4/3/2013 United 1444-ZK class
Seattle-New York/Newark 2,401 0 2,401 4,802 2,401 1

GoAmtrak May 13, 2013 11:16 am


Originally Posted by demkr (Post 20743587)
There's typically a "decent" P fare for that route too

If you're booking o/w, the P fare is often cheaper than the cheapest Y. (UA often matches SY for r/t fares, but UA and DL are oligopolists in the o/w market.) Might explain the scant CPUs in some cases.

I've had decent luck even with the A319, but I'm usually flying on Sundays and not Mondays, Thursdays, etc.

Boraxo May 13, 2013 12:39 pm

I am 0/6 (0%) as a 1K traveling SFO-IAH and vice versa. Much worse than PMCO. :mad:

Just too many GS now on the merged carrier and too many passengers connecting to international C/F.

On the plus side I was only 4th on the list the last 2 flights, which is better than the mid-20s on the IAD flights :(

LarkSFO May 13, 2013 1:10 pm


Originally Posted by Boraxo (Post 20744217)
I am 0/4 (0%) as a 1K traveling SFO-IAH and vice versa. Much worse than PMCO. :mad:

Yeah, CO flights out of SFO likely had many fewer elites than the combined / new UA...


Originally Posted by Boraxo (Post 20744217)
Just too many GS now on the merged carrier and too many passengers connecting to international C/F.

Wait, you're contradicting the narrative!

Most of the HVF's have left UA (which would include GS' and Int'l C/F flyers...)

UA-NYC May 13, 2013 1:13 pm


Originally Posted by LarkSFO (Post 20744404)
Wait, you're contradicting the narrative!

Most of the HVF's have left UA (which would include GS' and Int'l C/F flyers...)

Not necessarily ;) - one of the theories was that there were extra GS' in IAH this year...many observed qualification criteria that seemed quite low there relative to other markets. Could have been to hold onto legacy PMCO traffic.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:17 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.