Originally Posted by IflyfromABE
(Post 20387484)
but, gee there are a lot of us who really miss the airline that was number one in awards as far as frequent flier programs went for like a decade
CO used to take home Freddies regularly in the late 1990's and early 2000's. The last time I see CO winning a single Freddie was in 2002. I think 2003 was the year they instated 50% EQM, which might have had an impact. http://www.freddieawards.com/winners.php?id=18 |
Originally Posted by Indelaware
(Post 20387793)
Indeed. This Platinum misses CO quite a bit. Yes, we are learning to live with the merger, and there are, I suppose some plusses. And there are negatives. And there are many trivial changes that don't count to much. But, the one thing that really disturbs me about the new airline is the UA mentality (both in management and in my fellow travellers) that the non-elite customer doesn't matter. Screw the secret handshake mentality: I want an airline that respects all customers -- and fellow passengers who realize that they are no better than the occasional traveller.
|
Originally Posted by Indelaware
(Post 20387793)
Indeed. This Platinum misses CO quite a bit. Yes, we are learning to live with the merger, and there are, I suppose some plusses. And there are negatives. And there are many trivial changes that don't count to much. But, the one thing that really disturbs me about the new airline is the UA mentality (both in management and in my fellow travellers) that the non-elite customer doesn't matter. Screw the secret handshake mentality: I want an airline that respects all customers -- and fellow passengers who realize that they are no better than the occasional traveller.
So which is it? Or let me guess, you want everyone to be treated like a Plat all the time. EVERYONE should sit up front. EVERYONE should board first. EVERYONE should have a special call line. Newsflash: When everyone is elite, no one is elite. And indeed, that's where we're headed.
Originally Posted by IflyfromABE
(Post 20387484)
and their top level elites never had to fly coach (hint: that airline was not pmUA).
I'll acknowledge that the CPU concept came to United from CO -- without the merger, we probably would never have had it. I was skeptical about it at first, just like many of us. But man, I came to LOVE it. At 95%, who wouldn't? But just as quickly as CO brought it to us, they essentially ripped it away with their ToD's. Jeffy Jefff would have been better off if the PMUA 1K's had never known just how nice CPU's could be. Had the transition been from e-500's to crappy CPU's in a ToD world, there would have been much less uproar, because frankly, our UG % probably would have been similar. |
Originally Posted by hobo13
(Post 20389778)
But just as quickly as CO brought it to us, they essentially ripped it away with their ToD's. Jeffy Jefff would have been better off if the PMUA 1K's had never known just how nice CPU's could be. Had the transition been from e-500's to crappy CPU's in a ToD world, there would have been much less uproar, because frankly, our UG % probably would have been similar.
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 20389834)
I still wish they would get rid of the CPU and go back to the e500 certs.
And I definitely think that Golds / Silvers (maybe Plats) would for sure be better with e-500's. |
1.5 years ago, I would say I like CPU's better. Today, I'm ambivalent. And I definitely think that Golds / Silvers (maybe Plats) would for sure be better with e-500's. |
Originally Posted by hobo13
(Post 20389749)
But just as quickly as CO brought it to us, they essentially ripped it away with their ToD's.
A Silver on a B fare now trumps a 1K on an E fare. That didn't happen before 3/3 on the UA side. Combined with the fare structure revisions that push several shorter stay trips to higher fares (CO had this previously, and we've seen more of it across the blended network, where B is sometimes the lowest fare for one-ways or < 3 day stays), we're probably seeing more B fares sold, and as a result, more instant-ups. So I'm sure there is a certain subset of customers that is now happy -- Gold/Silver Y/B customers. But the question is, are those the customers to be rewarding? If the fare structure pushed them to Y/B, and they bought the ticket because of the schedule, they're just buying the ticket because it was the cheapest available, and upgrading because the little Upgrade link showed up. Meanwhile, the 100,000-mile mixed fare flyer like the one above who saw their upgrade rate tank to half or less takes note and moves all of his business away. So that raises the question of what is the more profitable move. Sure, the Y/B fare Silver is a good, profitable customer. But what is his flight risk vs. higher-volume, mixed fare flyers? If the Silver B is buying the flight because of schedule, and paying the fare because that's the fare offered, then he's far more likely to do it anyway, irrespective of the instant-upgrade perk, no? Or it could be a combination of the Y/B policy combined with a flawed fare structure. If people are ever in a situation where Y/B is the cheapest, then that means they are not realizing even $1 of extra revenue for the F cabin from an Elite. Take the example above, where the Silver buys the cheapest fare he can find, a B fare, and change that to an E fare, but offer a B fare for marginally more. THEN, the Silver would be consciously paying more for the F cabin rather than utilizing the finite resource with no positive effect on revenue. |
Originally Posted by Brasila
(Post 20390062)
True.....I never heard the word "kettles" either until I saw it used by CO flyers....do kettles have a secret handshake....
|
Originally Posted by entropy
(Post 20390118)
it is interesting... I think a lot of people would rather know they have a reasonable shot at an upgrade, even as a gold. Rationing out upgrades (As they used to) is a good thing. Setting up everyone for the expectation that they're going to get an upgrade leads to despair 'dammit #39 on the upgrade list?!'.
Originally Posted by channa
(Post 20390256)
So I'm sure there is a certain subset of customers that is now happy -- Gold/Silver Y/B customers. But the question is, are those the customers to be rewarding?
If the fare structure pushed them to Y/B, and they bought the ticket because of the schedule, they're just buying the ticket because it was the cheapest available, and upgrading because the little Upgrade link showed up. Meanwhile, the 100,000-mile mixed fare flyer like the one above who saw their upgrade rate tank to half or less takes note and moves all of his business away. So that raises the question of what is the more profitable move. Sure, the Y/B fare Silver is a good, profitable customer. But what is his flight risk vs. higher-volume, mixed fare flyers? If the Silver B is buying the flight because of schedule, and paying the fare because that's the fare offered, then he's far more likely to do it anyway, irrespective of the instant-upgrade perk, no? |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 20391040)
The gate monitors with 45 people on the UG list when there are 24 F seats available is laughable, and as you note, creates disappointment, not anticipation.
|
Not Exactly...
Originally Posted by craz
(Post 20383883)
Although I dont care for Jeff & Co, something tells me you dont follow the stock mkt
2. I was not questioning the value of stock of UA. I was simply stating that Jeff's pitch was based upon SCREAMING THE FACT THAT HE created the World's Biggest Airline & ALL the advantages all is worth. 3. Now that HE will no longer be #1, what does he do??? Trashes that theory & says, "No, being #1 ain't that important". Nothing chaps my A$$ more than hypocrisy!!! |
Originally Posted by I_Can_Fly_US_Airways
(Post 20392608)
1. I follow the stock market more closely than 99.9% of most people on the planet. . .
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 20388596)
I think most pmUA customers would disagree strongly with your characterization that at pmUA, the non-elite customer didn't matter. They did. But pmUA wasn't bashful about the better treatment afforded to their elites, and as a result, many of us flew UA even when it cost us more to do so, and was less convenient.
We clearly think differently.
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
(Post 20388999)
How can the non-elite customer not matter when they get the best (read: cheapest) upgrade offers, bypassing elites on the WL?
How can they not matter when, if they get a $95 credit card, they're treated the same as a Million Mile Flyer? Clearly we think differently.
Originally Posted by hobo13
(Post 20389749)
This makes no sense. On one hand you say you are a Plat who misses CO. On the other, you are disturbed that UA doesn't care about non-elites.
So which is it? Or let me guess, you want everyone to be treated like a Plat all the time. EVERYONE should sit up front. EVERYONE should board first. EVERYONE should have a special call line. Newsflash: When everyone is elite, no one is elite. And indeed, that's where we're headed. I don't need a special line at the airport or on the phone. I want an airline that has well trained staff treating each customer the same. Clearly we think differently.
Originally Posted by andrewwm
(Post 20390404)
:rolleyes: You must not have been around the old UA forum much. I remember dozens of threads in the old UA forum about how UA was a terrible airline for GMs but great if you were an elite, plus countless hundreds/thousands more that used the term kettle derogatively.
|
Originally Posted by Indelaware
(Post 20392698)
. . . Upgrades are, IMHO, of trivial value. . .
|
Originally Posted by channa
(Post 20389231)
I miss that, too. But I don't blame UA or Jeff Smisek for it. That CO was long gone over a decade ago.
CO used to take home Freddies regularly in the late 1990's and early 2000's. The last time I see CO winning a single Freddie was in 2002. I think 2003 was the year they instated 50% EQM, which might have had an impact. http://www.freddieawards.com/winners.php?id=18 The more a company gave things away the more awards they won, but that doesnt mean its being Runned properly |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:54 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.