LCY new terminal plans
#16
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,591
The airlines could give lounge-entitled passengers a voucher for a few £ in one of the cafes. So long as they have to buy consumables so that it doesn't suffer the LHR T5C issue of people (not me *cough*) collecting coffee beans and mugs, I'm sure it'll work well.
#17
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The North
Posts: 1,847
I guess I’m not the target market for LCY in that in N3 I live around an hour away by tube/dlr or weekday traffic. That means I need to allow a large buffer for delays and therefore arrive considerably more than an hour before the flight on most occasions. I therefore would need a lounge if I’m going to shift any flights over from Heathrow.
I get that larger does not have to mean it takes longer to get through the airport but It’s a shame that while expanding they are not making room for a facility that would make some of us more likely to use the airport...
I get that larger does not have to mean it takes longer to get through the airport but It’s a shame that while expanding they are not making room for a facility that would make some of us more likely to use the airport...
One thing which did catch my eye is this recent piece including an interview with LCY's Chair - formerly the boss at Crossrail - in which he discusses adding an LCY station to Crossrail and an extension from Abbey Wood to Ebbsfleet. It includes the following quote:
"The airport is changing. Historically it has served Canary Wharf and the City – the financial capital in particular – our catchment area is now growing and incorporating more of central London.“We’re keen to extend it to the south as well to Essex and to Kent and to create more of a mainstream airport serving all of London. So it makes a great deal of sense to be properly connected to the rail infrastructure get people to and from London City even more easily"
So they are certainly aware of the possibility of expanding their catchment away from the City/Docklands folk who are able to be there reliably at T-30.
Similarly there was an interview in April with the Chief Development Officer bemoaning the lack of a Crossrail station and looking at ways this could be addressed.
#18
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: London
Programs: BAEC blue dust
Posts: 271
Same here The appeal of LCY for me, other than being a 10-15 minutes cab ride from my front door, is that it's compact and quick. The pinch point at the moment is security - there's been a few times when I was there at 06:15 for a 07:00 flight and the queue was going back to where you scan your BP... turned out they only had 1 lane open which is really not clever at what is rush hour there
Last edited by Irreverent Medusa; Dec 21, 2018 at 6:21 am
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,200
But given the number of elites at LCY it would soon get pretty expensive.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,536
Basically, anything that challenges Heathrow's dominant position (and ideally anything that would challenge BA's dominant position and give more potential slots to competitors) is good for customers. It is a shame however that Crossrail won't stop at LCY.
#21
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors, Virgin
Posts: 766
It will also be a ground-breaking change for ATC. There will not be a tower at the airport. Instead it will be a "digital Tower" located in Hampshire using high res cameras and high speed data feeds. There are a number of these around the world but all operating small numbers of flights per day. This will a first for an airport with in excess of 30 movements per hour at times.
#22
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci.
Posts: 2,047
The favourite thing for me is the apron view seating ; I hope this is retained
I always have mixed feeings about the expansion of the leisure sector as it changes the feel of the place though this is limited by the airctaft size
The inages appear to suggest a larger form of the current set up with a higher roof but its hard to tell
Would be great if the expanded the trans atlantic flights with a dedicated club world lounge but the 318 service seens to be in its last legs
I always have mixed feeings about the expansion of the leisure sector as it changes the feel of the place though this is limited by the airctaft size
The inages appear to suggest a larger form of the current set up with a higher roof but its hard to tell
Would be great if the expanded the trans atlantic flights with a dedicated club world lounge but the 318 service seens to be in its last legs
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,200
Well since they got rid of one A318 that's not going to happen and even with a fuel stop in SNN there are few viable TATL routes for the baby bus.
They did have a lounge at LCY for the CWLCY service but LCY needed the gate space.
They did have a lounge at LCY for the CWLCY service but LCY needed the gate space.
#24
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,546
The lack of Crossrail station is because the owners of LCY refused to put their hands in their pockets. Canary Wharf and Woolwich both got Crossrail stations because the respective land owners paid for it - in the case of CW they actually built the station as well as providing the site.
It would be far more difficult and multiple times more expensive to retroactively add a station at LCY now that the Crossrail construction phase is over. If the airport owners wouldn't pay first time round, who do they think is going to fund this new station now ???
It would be far more difficult and multiple times more expensive to retroactively add a station at LCY now that the Crossrail construction phase is over. If the airport owners wouldn't pay first time round, who do they think is going to fund this new station now ???
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 10,709
It will also be a ground-breaking change for ATC. There will not be a tower at the airport. Instead it will be a "digital Tower" located in Hampshire using high res cameras and high speed data feeds. There are a number of these around the world but all operating small numbers of flights per day. This will a first for an airport with in excess of 30 movements per hour at times.
#26
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newcastle, UK
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Gold, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, Avis Preferred Plus, Amex Plat
Posts: 2,080
When I first started flying from NCL, domestic flights had a ~30m walk from kerb to gate, with barely a foot off that line for check-in, WH Smith and the lounge! Sadly the current route, via upstairs, has more twists than an episode of Tales of the Unexpected, and now compulsory perfume and gin viewing.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,200
The lack of Crossrail station is because the owners of LCY refused to put their hands in their pockets. Canary Wharf and Woolwich both got Crossrail stations because the respective land owners paid for it - in the case of CW they actually built the station as well as providing the site.
It would be far more difficult and multiple times more expensive to retroactively add a station at LCY now that the Crossrail construction phase is over. If the airport owners wouldn't pay first time round, who do they think is going to fund this new station now ???
It would be far more difficult and multiple times more expensive to retroactively add a station at LCY now that the Crossrail construction phase is over. If the airport owners wouldn't pay first time round, who do they think is going to fund this new station now ???
Every time LCY have raised this issue TFL have responded 'come back with a feasibility study / business case and we will look at it' but LCY haven't got around to putting one together. Every stop on the line adds 1-2 minutes to the total journey time so you can see the reluctance to add any more stops to the route.
Though passive provision for a station has been made at / close to the old Silvertown station site for a possible future station but that would require some sort of transit system to get passengers to the airport. I really don't see the local residents liking shuttle buses running up and down between LCY and the Station all day. That's not such an issue from Custom House DLR because the route isn't through a residential area.
LCY would have preferred a station at the airport but that simply wasn't possible due to the Connaught Tunnel and the line being on a curve there which causes issues with train to platform gaps which would be considered excessive
#28
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK. BAEC AAdvantage
Programs: Mucci Des Oeufs Brouilles et des Canards
Posts: 3,671
.......
Firstly, there seem to be a lot more leisure flights these days. Secondly, with what seems to be an increased number of flights to all types of destinations, City is now quite convenient as an alternative LHR/LGW to people on north/east of London - and because many people arrive by public transport (with multiple connections)...........
Firstly, there seem to be a lot more leisure flights these days. Secondly, with what seems to be an increased number of flights to all types of destinations, City is now quite convenient as an alternative LHR/LGW to people on north/east of London - and because many people arrive by public transport (with multiple connections)...........
#29
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK. BAEC AAdvantage
Programs: Mucci Des Oeufs Brouilles et des Canards
Posts: 3,671
2) When LCY was built, much of the surrounding area was derelict or warehouses with some residential. Now it's like the old HKG airport with the towers around it. I've been to friends who live at the end of Western Dock and having a conversation on a summer evening is difficult with departures every few minutes. I don't think there are many 1st world airports with housing so close these days. People would have bought with the knowledge that a weekend curfew exists and would probably sue if it was changed.
#30
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London, Babylon-on-Thames
Programs: BAEC Blue (back to Earth)
Posts: 1,508
No, no, no. There is immense overlap, look at the geography. I used to live on the Isle of Dogs and I know the area very well and used both airports, as well as Gatters frequently. BA have succesfully built a dominant position at LCY, allowing them to dictate to the market rather than vice-versa.
For example, one of the reasons BA brought the axed LCY-GLA back was that they cut back on LHR-GLA to free up slots for long haul (pre BMI buy out) as they can shift capacity between LHR and LCY, see also ORY being shifted out of LHR completely. But the catchment area of LCY going West finds it just as easy, if not easier to get to West London than Docks. It will be interesting to see just what the effect of the (now delayed) Crossrail has, as well as the ever-delayed third runway, but I can't imagine the impact will not be noticed.
For example, one of the reasons BA brought the axed LCY-GLA back was that they cut back on LHR-GLA to free up slots for long haul (pre BMI buy out) as they can shift capacity between LHR and LCY, see also ORY being shifted out of LHR completely. But the catchment area of LCY going West finds it just as easy, if not easier to get to West London than Docks. It will be interesting to see just what the effect of the (now delayed) Crossrail has, as well as the ever-delayed third runway, but I can't imagine the impact will not be noticed.