Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > Trip Reports
Reload this Page >

Air Canada - The Airline Everyone Loves to Hate - Hong Kong to Vancouver

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Air Canada - The Airline Everyone Loves to Hate - Hong Kong to Vancouver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2017, 7:09 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,505
Air Canada - The Airline Everyone Loves to Hate - Hong Kong to Vancouver

With the peak summer travel season imminent, it was time to escape the humid Hong Kong heat and head to cooler shores. Air Canada had a reasonably-priced fare on their High Density 777. After a search through the seat map, I decided to go for it thanks to the back seats being available, where the row of 3 becomes 2 so it is slightly more spacious. The return leg in Premium Economy did not cost an arm or a leg either so I wanted to give it a try. The biggest attraction was the cheap stopover option available where passengers transiting in Canada's largest cities can pick from a selection of hotels for an overnight stay. I wanted to break up the long flight anyway so this sort of itinerary was naturally appealing.

My last trip on Air Canada was nothing to boast about. The flight was late, the crew weren't too friendly, but at least the plane was empty. I didn't expect tonight's Hong Kong - Vancouver flight to be anywhere near that empty, but it got off to not such a good start with a 40-minute departure delay, albeit that was decided well before check-in opened.

By the time I reached the airport at around 6:30pm, or about an hour before the original departure time, the check-in counters were deserted and they had started to remove the Air Canada accessories to prepare for Turkish Airlines. I guess everyone came well before the original departure time and not the revised later one?



Check-in took a while as I had an onward domestic leg from Vancouver to Toronto, which the agent wasn't sure whether she could thru-check my bag. To my disappointment, only same-day transfers could be tagged all the way to the destination. I had to retrieve my bag in Vancouver and store it overnight with me, bringing more inconvenience.

With a 2 hour buffer between the inbound and my departure, I thought a 1-hour delay for the inbound's arrival was still enough to clean and restock the plane. I guess they really needed a full 2 hours and there was no slack time built in. As I approached the gate, I noticed long confusing lines snaking out from Gate 63. You know it's Air Canada when the crowds emerge. Even boarding an Emirates A380 doesn't stir up such a scene.



By now, the priority Zone 1-2 lines pretty much emptied out and they announced Zone 3 would board. The problem is when a full 777 with such a huge Economy Class clusters around 2 zones, it's a recipe for disaster. The lines snaked out to the next gate and I had no idea which was which. I eventually found the line that was moving and kept walking up with the crowd. Good job, Air Canada.

The back part of the 777 curves so that the window only has a row of 2 instead of 3, making it a bit easier to jump out for the bathroom while providing more stretch room for the legs and storage beside my seat. I wouldn't have gone for the 777 if I couldn't get one of these seats. At first glance, the plane wasn't vacuumed properly and there were plenty of food bits still lying on the floor by the fuselage.











We ended up departing about 50 minutes behind schedule in pouring rain. The moving map is quite good to track our movements. With bad weather in the area, it was a bumpy ascent to cruise.



A late dinner emerged. It looked obviously worse than Cathay's selection. The portion was quite small and there was just a pudding for dessert and no ice-cream. There was already small bottle of water in the seat pocket when we boarded.





As we flew over Taiwan and headed towards Japan, persistent turbulence disturbed the otherwise calm cabin. Things got progressively worse as we flew over Japan, and the announcement came to stay put with "light to moderate turbulence". That statement was a bit of an understatement. It got so bad that we had to descend below 27,000 feet. It's going to be a long night!



Luckily, the skies cleared as we approached Hokkaido. The routing seemed a bit odd that we wouldn't ride the jet stream across the Pacific southeast of Japan.



I wondered why we didn't head southeast of Japan and ride the prevailing winds across the Pacific?



We continued a fairly northern trajectory and the sun was poking out already. By the time we crossed into Alaska, it was all bright and sunny.













Mid-flight, a sandwich and cookie snack was served. I wasn't too hungry since I sat and dozed throughout the flight. The sandwich didn't taste anything special but the delicious cookies from my prior Tokyo flight were back.



A watery congee breafast was also served before landing. I suppose the small dinner was OK given we were fed 3 times for tonight's transpacific crossing.





Then the clouds rolled in south of the Queen Charlotte Islands. The forecast in Vancouver wouldn't be too good today.











I was hoping for a decent photography opportunity on descent. At least it wasn't raining ...







We landed well over an hour behind schedule after a seemingly lengthy flight despite favourable prevailing winds. Luckily, summer days are long so it was still bright at 5:40pm.



The airport was much quieter and had lots of narrowbodies.







Welcome back to Vancouver. It has been over a decade since I last visited.



There were a few announcements during the flight that customs arrival forms were no longer necessary as machines have replaced humans for much of the arrival process. Although I sat at the back of the plane, there wasn't a big line for immigration since there were rows of machines available. Scan your passport, answer the old paper questions on screen, take a photo, and a receipt prints out with your photo and a big number for the customs check. Many passengers couldn't get it right since families can group together to take that photo. Seems this is a new piece of automation for everyone.

Luggage didn't take excessively long. For those connecting in Vancouver, they still had to drag their luggage out but re-deposit them in a transfer belt. How annoying to do this yourself after a 12-hour flight! Since I was staying in Vancouver tonight, I lined up for the customs check. Unlike Japan, there are no proper counters to put up your luggage to allow the agents to properly investigate it (I guess they would go into the hidden rooms for that). The agent just grabbed my receipt and I was on my way.



Vancouver is a mid-sized airport and everything looked cozy. Hotel shuttles were just outside international arrivals and the Canada Line trains depart across the street and upstairs.



From time-to-time after booking my flights, I double-check my reservations to make sure nothing has changed so I won't arrive surprised. The stopover program's website keeps a running record of my hotel reservations. Interestingly, there was a disclaimer on it that hotel transfers are not included. But that is probably a standard sentence embedded into all reservations, since my stopover hotel does provide a free airport shuttle for the 10-minute ride.

Air Canada is not reknowned for premium service. Best in North America doesn't mean anything. That's a pitiful continent to fly in the first place. But it will give you a fairly good offer for a nonstop flight. Just find a cozy spacious corner and not somewhere in the middle of the huge HD cabin. The 3-4-3 configuration is quite a torture for such a long flight and the seats are indeed noticeably narrower.

More : http://www.globalphotos.org/ac8.htm
hkskyline is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 9:55 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: YYZ
Programs: A3&O6 Gold,IC AMB & HH Diamond
Posts: 14,132
You should have flown with EVA, its a much better airline. We flew EVA from Toronto to Singapore in Premium economy and it was very good.
djjaguar64 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 10:39 am
  #3  
TCD
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: EWR
Programs: UA Gold, BA, HHonors, Avis
Posts: 192
Thanks for this, always nice to see reviews of economy, and this is well written and comprehensive. I have to say that I really don't see AC as best in North America, I've never had a drama free trip on them and much prefer the service quality on United even. I'll be interested to see what you made of premium economy though, I've never tried that on AC.
TCD is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 1:44 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,181
I don't mind Air Canada as the legroom is 32"; at least it was on their older aircraft. However they lost my suitcase and never found it ever again. I went through hell. Had to call India nearly daily for 3 months.

The French speaking Indian staff were more helpful than the English speakers. They spoke excellent French.

They only offered me US$1,200, when the maximum under international treaties or IATA I believe was $1,800. I had at least $4,000 of clothes in there; winter coats etc.

So I had to sue them in Small Claims Court. Only then did they agree to give me the maximum.
Bretteee is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 11:12 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: YYJ
Posts: 4,137
Wow, you sure don't like Air Canada - the bias in your report is noticeable throughout. Was there a reason you chose to fly them despite your distaste?
cedric is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2017, 7:19 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: YYZ
Programs: A3&O6 Gold,IC AMB & HH Diamond
Posts: 14,132
Originally Posted by cedric
Wow, you sure don't like Air Canada - the bias in your report is noticeable throughout. Was there a reason you chose to fly them despite your distaste?
We all know about AC and how inconsistent an airline it is. As well its not a service oriented airline so I completely understand the OP's perspective.
worldtraveller73 likes this.
djjaguar64 is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2017, 8:54 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by cedric
Wow, you sure don't like Air Canada - the bias in your report is noticeable throughout. Was there a reason you chose to fly them despite your distaste?
Not that many choices to go to Vancouver unless I make stops elsewhere, and AC offered very cheap fares even with a Y+ return. I got what I paid for, and the expectations weren't high already. I don't think the operating cost needs to go up to improve a lot of the problems on the ground and in the air. Nevertheless, they can still organize things better and the seats are indeed a torture - not a bias at all.
hkskyline is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2017, 8:56 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by TCD
Thanks for this, always nice to see reviews of economy, and this is well written and comprehensive. I have to say that I really don't see AC as best in North America, I've never had a drama free trip on them and much prefer the service quality on United even. I'll be interested to see what you made of premium economy though, I've never tried that on AC.
I'll post the Y+ report soon for the return trip.
hkskyline is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2017, 5:26 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: YYJ
Posts: 4,137
Originally Posted by hkskyline
Not that many choices to go to Vancouver unless I make stops elsewhere, and AC offered very cheap fares even with a Y+ return. I got what I paid for, and the expectations weren't high already. I don't think the operating cost needs to go up to improve a lot of the problems on the ground and in the air. Nevertheless, they can still organize things better and the seats are indeed a torture - not a bias at all.
Certainly making statements like "the airline everyone loves to hate" - which are factually incorrect - imply bias. Or using words like "It looked obviously worse than Cathay's selection." (why is it obvious?). Or insinuating that the pilots/dispatch chose a routing that was not optimal (what information do you have that indicates this was the case?). "You know it's Air Canada when the crowds emerge." (what does that even mean?).

Certainly, there were some factual statements which indicated that a better effort could have been made by AC eg "the plane wasn't vacuumed properly and there were plenty of food bits still lying on the floor". But it was difficult to trust the overall report given the overall bias that was prevalent. Nonetheless, I appreciated the photos and the later comments that you felt that the flight provided good value "I got what I paid for" compared to more expensive options.
cedric is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2017, 11:45 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by cedric
Certainly making statements like "the airline everyone loves to hate" - which are factually incorrect - imply bias. Or using words like "It looked obviously worse than Cathay's selection." (why is it obvious?). Or insinuating that the pilots/dispatch chose a routing that was not optimal (what information do you have that indicates this was the case?). "You know it's Air Canada when the crowds emerge." (what does that even mean?).

Certainly, there were some factual statements which indicated that a better effort could have been made by AC eg "the plane wasn't vacuumed properly and there were plenty of food bits still lying on the floor". But it was difficult to trust the overall report given the overall bias that was prevalent. Nonetheless, I appreciated the photos and the later comments that you felt that the flight provided good value "I got what I paid for" compared to more expensive options.
I don't think there is a need for a 1000 word description on what "obvious" would be, if you have eaten meals on both airlines. The photos speak for themselves.

Anyone with basic meteorological training would know where the jet stream is located and that my route that night did not take advantage of that. I am also curious why they chose a northerly route as we did not escape from the bad weather anyway.

Having flown on many international airlines, I have never seen the crowds and chaos at an Air Canada gate in another developed country. Even for Emirates when they try to board an A380, things are far more orderly. The criticism and comments I presented here are factually accurate so I don't see how you picking on a few bits of judgment here and there imply I'm twisting the truth in some sort of "bias". Looking at the problems this airline has at operating and organizing its operations, I don't think it's a surprise everyone loves to hate AC.
hkskyline is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2017, 2:49 am
  #11  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: Marriott Ti/LTP
Posts: 1,329
Originally Posted by hkskyline

Anyone with basic meteorological training would know where the jet stream is located and that my route that night did not take advantage of that. I am also curious why they chose a northerly route as we did not escape from the bad weather anyway.
So where was it that night? How do you know it was more advantageous to go south? Do you a think that an airline would randomly decide to spend more money on fuel and not take advantage of the winds?
GoSh4rks is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2017, 8:49 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by GoSh4rks
So where was it that night? How do you know it was more advantageous to go south? Do you a think that an airline would randomly decide to spend more money on fuel and not take advantage of the winds?
Cathay's flight to Vancouver that day took the jet stream route and crossed the Pacific on a more southerly route, with flight time being 1 hour less. We flew further west then north, over the Siberian coast and crossed into Alaska.

Unless the jet stream died off within hours such that my AC flight could no longer take advantage of that, which was unlikely ...

Perhaps some route planning experts can explain this. I rarely see an eastbound transpacific flight take this route. Even HKG-YYZ doesn't always go through the poles on the eastbound but ride the prevailing winds across the Pacific.
hkskyline is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2017, 9:33 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OOL/DOH
Programs: QF LTS WP, Avis Pres Club, HH Diam.
Posts: 3,192
Perhaps there was an issue with their ETOPS certification for that aircraft?

They appeared to hug the coastline all the way there.
VH-RMD is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2017, 6:33 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,677
I flew Air Canada many years back, and loved it. But with all the bad reviews that people have been giving it over the years, I've dreaded going back.

Unfortunately the replacement, British Airways, hasn't been any better....
SQTraveller is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2017, 7:19 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: YWG
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,478
Originally Posted by hkskyline
Not that many choices to go to Vancouver unless I make stops elsewhere, and AC offered very cheap fares even with a Y+ return. I got what I paid for, and the expectations weren't high already.
@:-)
Freedom to choose is a beautiful thing.
Cheap Y transpacific will never be a choice we make but thanks for reporting your experience.
canolakid is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.