FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   empty empty empty-my recent flights are empty (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/885980-empty-empty-empty-my-recent-flights-empty.html)

antlass Nov 8, 2008 8:00 am

I flew DTW-LHR-DTW on NW a couple weeks ago and both directions were quite empty. Just about everyone had their whole row to themselves. I had the lovely 4-across seats all for me in both directions. Paid Y fare (even though that was pretty expensive TBH) and was able to lie fully flat and actually get some good shut eye for a change. Thats never happened to me before in coach, and I was grateful. The FA's were commenting on the light load all the way...

Also flew DTW-OKC-DTW last weekend and the flights were more fully booked. Still managed both C&D to myself on the CRJ each way though... ;)

RustyC Nov 8, 2008 4:07 pm


Originally Posted by jhayes_1780 (Post 10661129)
IIRC mid Nov is dead until USA thanksgiving..... right?

It's a cyclical low for passengers, but the usual response is to offer targeted or limited-date fare deals to fill seats. Many of us with time flexibility who were maintaining elite status on our own dime would wind up doing disproportionate amounts of qualifying travel during the spring and fall lulls simply because that's when deals happened or when seats became available.

OTOH, I think the economic distress this year, and especially in recent weeks, is enough to keep a lot of discretionary travelers away. Airlines haven't been passing on lower fuel costs (they've cut flights rather than doing discounting), and taxes on hotels and especially rental cars aren't looking very fair in light of the current economy. You've also got places like Las Vegas that are doing discounting but have taken so many flight cuts that it's hard to get there cheaply from some places.

To make a long story short, I'm one of the people not being seen this year who has been there in past years. I think there are quite a few.

Steph3n Nov 8, 2008 4:49 pm

The only flights on CO I've been on with less than 80% load were come Colgan Air flights where everyone had to sit behind row 7, and most of them were pretty full in the back then, so about 45-50% loads.

Loren Pechtel Nov 8, 2008 9:50 pm

My wife was on SFO->PVG. While the row started out with passengers they later moved to find more space, leaving her with a row of 3 to curl up in.

mersk862 Nov 9, 2008 1:04 am

I've been taking 4 flights/week over the past several weeks and all have been 75%+ loads (all on DL). Last time I was on a plane that was maybe 50% full was on a Friday morning LAS-LAX flight back in February on an AA MD-80.

NCLSEA123 Nov 9, 2008 9:16 pm

I flew SEA-YKA once on Christmas day on a Q200, and that little thing wasn't even quarter full.

ACB Nov 10, 2008 5:02 pm

I flew MLI-ORD-LGA this afternoon on UA. ORD-LGA was half full, maybe a little less. The following UA ORD-LGA flight was canceled, and I suspect it may have been a capacity issue as only four passengers were flying standby on my flight.

icurhere2 Nov 10, 2008 5:22 pm


Originally Posted by airportdrunk (Post 10665312)
I haven't seen any empty row in 3+ years. Maybe it's just continental.

I had row 6 to myself on WN 0196 (BWI-BNA evening flight) two weeks ago.

sbm12 Nov 10, 2008 6:43 pm

This weekend I was on 12 flights. The 4 CO flights were 90%+ loads. At least one (and I think 2) was 100%, all of them were full in F. The 8 UA flights were a mixed bag. Two of them were <50% (DEN-OKC-DEN) where everyone in E+ pretty much had their own row across and E- wasn't 100% full either, one was full and the others were 50-70%.

rkkwan Nov 10, 2008 6:51 pm


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 10710480)
This weekend I was on 12 flights. The 4 CO flights were 90%+ loads. At least one (and I think 2) was 100%, all of them were full in F.

CO's domestic LF for October was 83%, 0.5% higher than 2007. Consolidated LF was 79%, 0.5% lower than 2007.

CO posts its month-to-date consolidated LF on its website's "Investor Relations" page. It is 77.3% as of 11/9. (Whole month 11/07 was 80.1%)

So, LF is holding up pretty well.

ksandness Nov 10, 2008 9:33 pm

I flew MSP>ORD>MCO on UA on Wednesday and the reverse on Sunday. The MSP>ORD leg was maybe 80%, as was the ORD>MCO leg. Coming back, the MCO>ORD flight (Ted) was packed solid, but the ORD>MSP flight was strangely empty. I had a whole row to myself.

SURGEADDICT Nov 10, 2008 11:49 pm

sounds like fare cutting is needed, especially with lower fuel prices.

RustyC Nov 12, 2008 1:31 am


Originally Posted by SURGEADDICT (Post 10713260)
sounds like fare cutting is needed, especially with lower fuel prices.

Yep. You've still got cartel-like behavior on routes without LCC competition. Ideal conditions for an airline like WN to start flying the route to rush into the vacuum created.

Maybe the endgame for the legacies is to shrink down to one route where they can charge $1 million a ticket. :p

Carolinian Nov 12, 2008 1:47 am

TATL won't save the legacies either with RyanAir announcing it will begin TATL service within the year with coach tickets beginning at GBP 8. and service from Dublin and London Stansted to a number of points in the US.

MiamiAirport Formerly NY George Nov 12, 2008 6:55 am

Since Labor Day, I have been flying a lot of JFK/MIA/SJU on what is typically the off times and I am still hearing "this is a very full flight" from the FAs. In October, I flew JFK/EZE and both ways were 100% full. Flights that I have done to DFW and LAX have easily been over 80%.

When I am stuck in Y, I'd like to see some of these less than 50% full flights.:eek:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:29 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.