![]() |
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 7236497)
And I have to respectfully disagree. Everything the airlines do is for a profit, but in this case it goes against the purpose of the jet. I mean, just look at its name, regional jet. I am sorry, but a IAH-CLT flight or DFW-ATL flight just isn't regional and most of the time those flights are full. I know they have their reasons for doing what they do (the airlines) but it makes more sense to me to deploy the jets in a point-to-point manner and let the turboprops do the puddle jumping.
|
Originally Posted by LarryJ
(Post 7236840)
The purpose of the jet as set by whom?
Certainly not the manufacturer. They will be glad to show any prospective customer the multitude of applications of which their airplane is capable. The purpose of the regional jet was set back when they first came into service. The airlines and the manufacturers touted them as being great point-to-point replacements for the turboprops. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_jet The first sentence and the one right before the list of regional airlines are the most poignant. |
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 7259200)
The purpose of the regional jet was set back when they first came into service.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:43 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.