Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Airplane seat widths

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Airplane seat widths

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 3:53 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,599
Airplane seat widths

With all the whining about seats getting crammed together more than ever, is the whining primarily because of people getting larger? Or are the seats truly closer together?

When looking at the major narrow-body jets in service during my early lifetime (707, 727, DC8, 737), it doesn't seem like they had anything but 6 across in the main cabin. Certainly the seats aren't narrower. Pitch may have been played around with, but I don't remember even my earliest flights (I was already about 14) to have anything but cramped pitch.

Was there a time in the era of modern jet service that the Y seating was really any wider? Or are we just bigger, and with crappy service (or none at all) have more time to ponder the sardinity of our inflight existence?
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 4:01 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
With all the whining about seats getting crammed together more than ever, is the whining primarily because of people getting larger? Or are the seats truly closer together?

When looking at the major narrow-body jets in service during my early lifetime (707, 727, DC8, 737), it doesn't seem like they had anything but 6 across in the main cabin. Certainly the seats aren't narrower. Pitch may have been played around with, but I don't remember even my earliest flights (I was already about 14) to have anything but cramped pitch.

Was there a time in the era of modern jet service that the Y seating was really any wider? Or are we just bigger, and with crappy service (or none at all) have more time to ponder the sardinity of our inflight existence?
Perhaps it's the degredation of service that causes the emotional pile-up of crappy things effect, but I can say for sure I am in fact bigger than when I was 14, or even nine or ten, when I remember my first flights and the seats seem smaller as compared to those years.

BTW - kudos for usage of the word 'sardinity'
tkey75 is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 4:06 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,599
Originally Posted by tkey75

BTW - kudos for usage of the word 'sardinity'
Thanks. I was having a Colbertesque moment. I should TM the word before someone steals it
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 4:19 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
Thanks. I was having a Colbertesque moment. I should TM the word before someone steals it
Sorry. I've already stolen it and it it sold to Jon Stewart for $4m. I'll send ya some extra eyeshades from the BKK trip I just booked. Fair?
tkey75 is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 4:34 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 33,000 feet
Programs: aa exp and ck, spg plat, hz pc, dl life gld, marriott life plat, others
Posts: 553
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
With all the whining about seats getting crammed together . . .are the seats truly closer together?
Well, the spreading of commuter style aircraft and regional jets has increased greatly the number of smaller seats. Even as the RJs grew over the turboprops they replaced, the operators stayed with the itsy-bitsy seat widths because they already had people used to sitting in discomfort -- to place normal width seats would have lowered the pax count and their profit levels.

Many smaller airports that had 'real' jet service are now covered by turboprops and RJs, even for durations that are FAR too long for the cramped space. These things are okay for 1 hour jaunts but excruciating for 2.5 or 3 hours at a sit.
eightmillionmiler is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 5:28 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MIA
Programs: Retired :)
Posts: 10,943
The seats seem wider since I've lost 20 pounds, but I'm still uncomfortable in an RJ. The coach (yikes, hate it, but it happens now and then) MD88 seats on the 2 seat side are pretty comfy for me.
Traveller is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 6:50 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: AA EXP, MR PLT
Posts: 12,880
Butts get wider but the seats remain the same.
AGuyAndADogInDFW is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 6:59 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Programs: MP, 1K 1MM
Posts: 1,255
Newsweek

for March 21, 2005, has a brief but informative article supplying plane seat pitch and widths.
dcutcher is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.