Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Why is this?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why is this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 7:25 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA 2P
Posts: 164
Why is this?

I never really understood a situation like this:

American Airlines Flight AA86 from ORD to LHR $840.50 per way
-and-
American Airlines Flight AA86 from ORD to LHR
Lufthansa Airlines Flight 6731 from LHR to DUB $216.20


My company won't pay for a non-stop to LHR, and I really don't want to stop over in DUB on the way there. (AA92 from ORD to DUB then Aer Lingus 158 from DUB to LHR for $292.70).

I know that the 2nd flight is throw-away ticketing. I am an EXP on AA so I can get my upgrade, but will they cancel my return if I book the outbound flight and book a return non-stop on AA or a different airline? My company is getting really strict on their travel policies, and we really fought with them to let them keep our own miles and not use them for business use.

Now combining those two flights (the AA86 throwaway and on the way back a non stop for $670 on Aer Lingus) would be about $890, roundtrip on AA would be $1746, or a really cheap option on AA inbound/Swiss Outbound for $605 r/t.

I know there's different seating inventory codes and a set number for each one but I wouldn't think they'd be sold out already for mid-March.


And another situation......
UA634 ORD to EWR
UA635 EWR to ORD Total Roundtrip $177.10
-or-
US6412 ORD to EWR (Operated as UA634...same flight as above)
US6415 EWR to ORD (Operated as UA635...same flight as above)
Total Roundtrip $447.10

Who is dumb enough to choose the US-branded on when UA is wayyy cheaper? I don't understand those codeshares between them.
cszulc is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 4:28 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bryn Mawr PA & Wailea HI
Posts: 15,726
On your next OP you might want to consider a more descriptive title. It often promotes answers to questions.

MisterNice
MisterNice is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 5:39 am
  #3  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Silicon Valley
Programs: AA:PLT&3MM, HGP:DIA, SPG:GOLD
Posts: 1,896
Why is this?

Because.
bp888 is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 7:15 am
  #4  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,956
Why is this?

42.

Oh wait, wrong question.
hairpeace is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 7:53 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago,IL.
Posts: 3,022
Why is this ?

It is what it is, because it is...
JohnG is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 9:22 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 187
A hijacking in progress... But I'll save it...

cszulc:
I know that the 2nd flight is throw-away ticketing. I am an EXP on AA so I can get my upgrade, but will they cancel my return if I book the outbound flight and book a return non-stop on AA or a different airline?
If the outbound and return are on one ticket, yes, they will. You CANNOT not fly a leg anymore and simply pick up the continuing flights. If you do throw-away ticketing it must be the last leg of the ticket.

The fare issue with the ORDLHR non-stop vs the connection is a routing issue. The fare on the non-stop is an ORDLHR fare. The AA/LH connection, even tho it's a connection thru LON, is actually a fare ORDDUB. Ireland fares are quite a bit less expensive. In the case of the ORDLHR connection on AA and EI, you have 2 fares - ORDDUB on AA and a cheap add-on DUBLHR on EI.

Isn't the Swiss option a connection also? But it seems the best compromise.

In the case of the US/UA codeshares, do you really want to know?
weblet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.