Wouldn't aircraft balance be improved if First Class were in the back?
#1
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Wouldn't aircraft balance be improved if First Class were in the back?
Airplanes can become unstable with too much weight in the rear and not enough in the front. First class sections carry less passenger weight per linear foot than coach sections.
Wouldn't airplanes be safer if airlines located business and first classes at the rear of the aircraft rather than at the front? To preserve boarding and exit convenience for premium passengers, the aircraft could be boarded from the rear door rather than the front.
Wouldn't airplanes be safer if airlines located business and first classes at the rear of the aircraft rather than at the front? To preserve boarding and exit convenience for premium passengers, the aircraft could be boarded from the rear door rather than the front.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Airplanes can become unstable with too much weight in the rear and not enough in the front. First class sections carry less passenger weight per linear foot than coach sections.
Wouldn't airplanes be safer if airlines located business and first classes at the rear of the aircraft rather than at the front? To preserve boarding and exit convenience for premium passengers, the aircraft could be boarded from the rear door rather than the front.
Wouldn't airplanes be safer if airlines located business and first classes at the rear of the aircraft rather than at the front? To preserve boarding and exit convenience for premium passengers, the aircraft could be boarded from the rear door rather than the front.
#3
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 27
I haven't seen any airport terminal air bridges connecting to the aft aircraft entry doors.
You would have the FC/BC passengers walk down from the air bridge, then on to the ramp, then up the portable stairs to the aft entry door?
FC and BC passengers would be safer seating in the back if there was a accident tho.
FC train passengers in India are seated in the last section of the train which makes then safer.
You would have the FC/BC passengers walk down from the air bridge, then on to the ramp, then up the portable stairs to the aft entry door?
FC and BC passengers would be safer seating in the back if there was a accident tho.
FC train passengers in India are seated in the last section of the train which makes then safer.
Last edited by Galileo787; Oct 12, 2016 at 1:41 pm
#4
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Mass
Programs: Independent
Posts: 4,829
Actually this is a know issue. But not the way you think. With the development of fancier first class and business class seating, some older aircraft are being pushed beyond their weight limits and thus are not able to fly with full loads, likewise the weight and balance issue is distorted, meaning airlines need to readjust cargo and baggage. Fortunately this is being thought about in the designs for newer aircraft.
The rear of the aircraft is both noisier and subject to more movement during turbulence as well. In the old days of turboprops, first was often located in the back, as that was a quieter section.
The rear of the aircraft is both noisier and subject to more movement during turbulence as well. In the old days of turboprops, first was often located in the back, as that was a quieter section.
#5
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: LH SEN; BA Gold
Posts: 8,405
Backing in a 80x80 widebody is pretty much a no-go. It would be like parking a car while blindfolded and without assistance of anybody.
Amsterdam has over the wing jet bridges, but I haven't seen them in action that often. Furthermore they don't seem to work with every aircraft type.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
When I've had to move due to W&B issues, it's always been towards the back. So the premise that planes are tail heavy isn't true, IME.
#7
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW London and NW Sydney
Programs: BA Diamond, Hilton Bronze, A3 Diamond, IHG *G
Posts: 6,344
For Virgin trains in the UK, first class is usually seated towards London.
#8
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: LH SEN; BA Gold
Posts: 8,405
I've been moved due to W&B issues as well, but those situation occurred in my case on turboprops, that did not carry specific First/business class seats.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: BA Gold, QF WP
Posts: 12,551
Blocking forward rows of seats on ERJ-170, ERJ-190 and sometimes A319/A320 aircraft with low expected loads for W&B is quite common on BA for example.
#11
Moderator: UK and Ireland & Europe
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Biggleswade
Programs: SK*G, Lots of Blue Elsewhere
Posts: 13,611
#13
Moderator: UK and Ireland & Europe
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Biggleswade
Programs: SK*G, Lots of Blue Elsewhere
Posts: 13,611
#14
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,307
Easyjet too, but they block seats towards the front so they can use only the front baggage hold for quicker loading/unloading
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
I don't think I've even seen W&B issues on widebodies, so no idea which direction they move people.