Babies and Redeyes
May 21, 2011, 5:04 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: DL 1MM/DM, SPG Platinum, Pete's Brass Rail & Car Wash Beer Club
Posts: 275
Babies and Redeyes
I know that everyone has the right to travel on any available flight at a given time of the day, but I personally think that it is rude to bring your baby on a redeye. I just got off a LAX-ATL redeye and there was a baby one row behind me that cried for 30 minutes straight in the middle of the flight. It is hard enough to get decent sleep on this rather short route, but having a screaming baby doesn't help the cause one bit.
I understand that babies need to fly places just like the rest of us, but please, do me/us a favor and take your screaming baby on day flights.
Now I'll try to catch a nap in the B25 skyclub, despite the rather loud morning patrons.
Rant over.
I understand that babies need to fly places just like the rest of us, but please, do me/us a favor and take your screaming baby on day flights.
Now I'll try to catch a nap in the B25 skyclub, despite the rather loud morning patrons.
Rant over.
May 21, 2011, 5:22 am
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: DL FO, UA, AA, AsiaMiles, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 7,982
I know that everyone has the right to travel on any available flight at a given time of the day, but I personally think that it is rude to bring your baby on a redeye. I just got off a LAX-ATL redeye and there was a baby one row behind me that cried for 30 minutes straight in the middle of the flight. It is hard enough to get decent sleep on this rather short route, but having a screaming baby doesn't help the cause one bit.
I understand that babies need to fly places just like the rest of us, but please, do me/us a favor and take your screaming baby on day flights.
Now I'll try to catch a nap in the B25 skyclub, despite the rather loud morning patrons.
Rant over.
I understand that babies need to fly places just like the rest of us, but please, do me/us a favor and take your screaming baby on day flights.
Now I'll try to catch a nap in the B25 skyclub, despite the rather loud morning patrons.
Rant over.
Maybe they didn't have any choice but to take the redeye, such as they were boxed in by an international itinerary or other scheduling problem.
It might be somewhat rude to bring the baby on the redeye assuming they had a choice, but IMO the rudest thing would be to take a baby in BE. I would never do this.
May 21, 2011, 5:26 am
#3
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
There are plenty of medications on the market that can knock the baby out for the duration, whether day or night flight. Flying parents should make use of them. Don't forget to dose your toddlers, too. 
May 21, 2011, 5:35 am
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: DL FO, UA, AA, AsiaMiles, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 7,982
Also once they get to the point where they can communicate, the parents should be teaching them how to behave, not drugging them.
May 21, 2011, 5:36 am
#5
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Programs: Starwood Gold, HiltonHHonors Silver, Marriott Silver, Delta SkyMiles
Posts: 1,775
There are plenty of medications on the market that can knock adults out for the duration, too. Personally, I bring along noise cancelling headphones and/or ear plugs whenever I travel.
May 21, 2011, 6:18 am
#6
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: NW WP
Posts: 103
IMO, as the parent of an infant and a toddler, I think red eyes are probably better because they are normal sleep times. I recently took my family from DTW to SAN for a vacation. I took a day time flight out (which you have to) and the kids slept for an hour on the first leg, and then were very awake on the second, and it was hard to keep them quiet and in one place.
On the red eye on the way back, right after take off, both of them slept all the way from SAN-ATL.
Given the options, as a parent I would rather take them on a red-eye, and as a passenger, I would rather other parents take them on a red-eye.
On the red eye on the way back, right after take off, both of them slept all the way from SAN-ATL.
Given the options, as a parent I would rather take them on a red-eye, and as a passenger, I would rather other parents take them on a red-eye.
May 21, 2011, 6:23 am
#7
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JAX / MUC / BER
Programs: DL DM, LH SEN, Mariott Titanium
Posts: 369
People will never cease to complain and bad karma should hit them more often. Fly on a private jet if you dont like the idea of sharing the cabin with your fellow human beings.
May 22, 2011, 11:54 pm
#8
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 24,997
Thread Alert
The new home for this thread is now the TravelBuzz! forum, as the only thing this topic — which is general in nature — has to do with Delta Air Lines is that one specific example that caused the “rant” occurred on a Delta Air Lines flight.
Regards,
Canarsie
Co-Moderator, Delta SkyMiles forum
Regards,
Canarsie
Co-Moderator, Delta SkyMiles forum
May 23, 2011, 12:52 am
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
Babies exist in the real world. Babies cry. Unless you are in your own private mode of transportation you will encounter the rest of humanity. Get over it.
May 23, 2011, 1:42 am
#10
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
IMO, as the parent of an infant and a toddler, I think red eyes are probably better because they are normal sleep times. I recently took my family from DTW to SAN for a vacation. I took a day time flight out (which you have to) and the kids slept for an hour on the first leg, and then were very awake on the second, and it was hard to keep them quiet and in one place.
On the red eye on the way back, right after take off, both of them slept all the way from SAN-ATL.
Given the options, as a parent I would rather take them on a red-eye, and as a passenger, I would rather other parents take them on a red-eye.
On the red eye on the way back, right after take off, both of them slept all the way from SAN-ATL.
Given the options, as a parent I would rather take them on a red-eye, and as a passenger, I would rather other parents take them on a red-eye.
May 23, 2011, 6:16 am
#11
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Zealand/ UK
Programs: NZ, EK, QF, SQ.
Posts: 776
IMO, as the parent of an infant and a toddler, I think red eyes are probably better because they are normal sleep times. I recently took my family from DTW to SAN for a vacation. I took a day time flight out (which you have to) and the kids slept for an hour on the first leg, and then were very awake on the second, and it was hard to keep them quiet and in one place.
On the red eye on the way back, right after take off, both of them slept all the way from SAN-ATL.
Given the options, as a parent I would rather take them on a red-eye, and as a passenger, I would rather other parents take them on a red-eye.
On the red eye on the way back, right after take off, both of them slept all the way from SAN-ATL.
Given the options, as a parent I would rather take them on a red-eye, and as a passenger, I would rather other parents take them on a red-eye.
If you have to travel long-distance with a baby or toddler, it makes more sense to fly at night, when the chances of the child sleeping for much of the flight are greater than during a daytime flight.
Our daughter-in-law has to return annually from the UK to Australia, for re-certification in her job. This year, she had to take her 15-month old daughter with her.
She reports that the night flights LHR to SYD (with intermediate stops) were much easier (because the child slept much of the time) than the return, mostly daytime, flights.
You simply cannot make a toddler stay in one place for a 14-hour flight. It's much less disruptive for all concerned to choose a night flight.
May 23, 2011, 7:25 am
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
If you want to take a sleeping pill before flight, have at it.
May 23, 2011, 7:46 am
#13
Join Date: Mar 2009
Programs: AGR,CO,PC,AA
Posts: 411
In a perfect world grandma would live down the street and there would be no reason for a baby to be in an aircraft, but until then pass me the bottle and I will happily drink myself to sleep.
May 23, 2011, 7:55 am
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
My opinion only, but I think people who bring crying infants on red-eyes for discretionary travel are no different than people who bring crying infants into theaters or fine restaurants, i.e. inconsiderate.
May 23, 2011, 8:13 am
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
Interesting take and not surprising. I understand your perspective, but disagree. Well, not so much with the theater and fine restaurant part.