Bingo! Diapers sometimes leak. Delaying changing them only invites a disaster.

When my kids were in diapers, I changed them wherever, whenever I thought it best. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...orum/smile.gif

On the floor in front of my seat if the lav had a line or the seatbelt sign was on or if we were in a holding pattern prior to landing. Nobody ever questioned me or caused me grief (and I pity the fool who might have tried to cause me any grief over this issue.)

Besides, if you think the seats and tray tables are clean and free of fecal matter (even without diaper changing), think again. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...um/biggrin.gif

Yuck!!! http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttravel_forum/eek.gif Don't the airlines have rules against this? I know I would expect compensation if the airline allowed this to happen next to me. A crying child is one thing but when a parent endangers the health of other passengers to releive a childs minor discomfort, they have definitely crossed the line. Kids crap, kids cry, get over it. If there is an 'emergency', either the parent chose to wait too long, or their child is probably too sick to fly, in which case bringing them onto the plane is irresponsible and negligent parenting. Either way, there is NO excuse for exposing other passengers to fecal matter (food service excluded http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttravel_forum/wink.gif ). And before you ask, yes I do have kids.



[This message has been edited by HigherFlyer (edited 07-30-2003).]

Are you aware of the bacteria and other hazmats in human feces?

There's a good reason why people can survive drinking urine, but not by eating their own stool.

Your attitude is not only incredibly selfish, it is also deeply irresponsible with regards to the heath of the public at large.

Regards,
Alex

Yes, completely aware. That's why I didn't smear the poop on the seats or other pax. It's easy to change a diaper neatly. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...orum/smile.gif

Selfish and irresponsible? Hardly. I made an informed choice and did what I considered best at the time. Neatly changing the diaper prevented an even messier situation from possibly developing. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...orum/smile.gif

And if the time arises, I'll do it again with my grandchildren someday.

Our mileage on this issue varies. Substantially. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...orum/smile.gif

Yes, as alexwuk stated, it was INCREDIBLY selfish, and DEEPLY irresponsible. You would NOT have gotten away with it if you were sitting next to me. I'm sorry, but as one parent to another, if you actually believe this is ok, you need to seriously re-evaluate your family's hygiene.

So, an overflowing poopy diaper would be preferable to a changing at the seat?

If it's overflowing than at least it's dropping on the person with the baby and not getting splashed on other passengers.

I guess.

The world is so full of intolerant individuals - who think they know best (or at least more than me). http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...um/biggrin.gif

It's the same with changing the diaper but more messy.

The world is so full of intolerant individuals

And selfish ones, who think that they, their car, their kids, whatever are the only important thing in the universe.

If the diaper is in danger of exploding, I find it hard to believe that you can neatly and efficiently clean it without making a mess...

While I'm at it - what the heck ever happened to pacifiers?!?!?! Why do parents with wailing children think the rest of us find it amusing? Put a sock in it (the child) if you don't have a pacifier!

Of course, this is the same country where adults take babies into rated R movies so they can cry and ruin my movie watching experience. Can't find a sitter or afford one? WAIT FOR VIDEO.

</rant>

Believe it or not, parents are not encouraging their children to cry for the pleasure of annoying you. Some infants are easily soothed with a pacifier, some are not (one of mine loved her "paci", the other two weren't impressed with them). Parents w/ children are on the plane for the exact same reason you are--That is-- to get to the destination. No one, least of all the parent, likes to listen to a baby's cries. Unfortunately, all babies cry at some time. Get over it.

As an FYI on the diaper issue: The normal infant stool (especially a breastfed infant) is very loose. This is not an indication of illness. If left unattended, it stands a good chance of dribbling out of the diaper. If the mother lays a blanket on the seat, changes the baby and disposes of the wipes and diaper in the air sick bag (which should then be given to the FA)--Your health isn't being "endangered" by the diaper change.

I was a flight attendant for 5 years and saw many on board diaper changes. When I flew, only the A310 had changing tables (and only in one lav). We allowed the changes anywhere on board with the exception of the galley. Sometimes parents attempted it on the aisle floor, but this isn't usually workable as it stops all traffic for the duration. In all the time I flew, not one passenger EVER complained to me because a baby was being changed next to them. And, if they had, I would have advised them to step into the galley until the change was over if they were offended by the sight.

Not disagreeing with corbetti or anyone else here, and I acknowledge I'm going a little off-topic, but sometimes during descent, the babies are crying because the air pressure differential is hurting them.

I've heard that some things can alleviate this (like sucking on a pacifier), but sometimes there is nothing to be done until they're old enough to equalize the pressure themselves.

I'll say it again. If the diaper is too full, it is the parents fault for not getting up off their seat and changing it sooner, or using a brand of diaper with a larger capacity. To change a diaper ANYWHERE on a plane just before landing as in the original post is simply unnecessary. The parent should have waited until they were in the terminal bathroom where there is enough room to do so without endangering other passengers. If a parent is unable (as opposed to unwilling) to leave the seat, they should ask for assistance from the FA's to get to the WC.
I'll ask again, don't the airlines have rules against this?

[This message has been edited by HigherFlyer (edited 07-30-2003).]

It's the parent's fault for not changing the baby before he poops when the seat belt sign was off? Babies don't care what miniature lights are on or off in the cabin. They go when they feel like it.

Is it safe to assume you don't have kids? There is no such thing as a diaper with "more capacity". A bigger diaper won't stay on the baby's butt, and then you're guaranteed to have a mess on your hands, pun intended.

I have three kids, and never did my wife or I have to change the baby on the plane (all flights <= 3.5 hours). It's not a very common occurrence that this is necessary, but when it does happen, it's gotta be done or it just gets worse real fast.

[This message has been edited by JS (edited 07-30-2003).]

Would you have tried to stop me? http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...um/biggrin.gif

Is there anything else I shouldn't do while seated next to you for fear that it will deeply offend your sensibilities? http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...um/biggrin.gif